Key research themes
1. How can archaeological science methods enhance understanding of prehistoric human behavior and material culture?
This theme addresses how scientific techniques, including microscopic residue analysis, ancient DNA (aDNA) studies, geochemical characterization, and experimental methodologies, systematically contribute to reconstructing human activities, technological organization, and evolutionary processes in prehistoric archaeology. It emphasizes the integration of archaeological science with theoretical interpretation to provide empirically grounded insights into past human behavior, technological innovation, and social organization, thus bridging the gap between material evidence and cultural narratives.
2. What evidence and criteria support identification of prehistoric hunter-gatherer aggregation sites and social dynamics?
Aggregation sites reflect spatial and temporal foci where prehistoric hunter-gatherers congregated, often for social, ritual, and subsistence reasons. Understanding these aggregations is crucial for reconstructing social complexity, group interactions, and mobility patterns. This theme explores how archaeological data—especially symbolic artifacts, bone and antler engraving assemblages, and settlement patterns—help define aggregation versus dispersion cycles, unravel the ecological and socio-ritual factors involved, and assess their variability and evolutionary significance.
3. How does the concept of archaeological traces illuminate epistemological and ontological challenges in reconstructing prehistoric pasts?
Archaeological traces—material remains that mediate past human presence—carry complex epistemic and ontological implications. This theme emphasizes that traces are not mere passive residues but dynamic phenomena with latent signification extending into the future. Understanding them as boundary objects between present materiality and inferred pasts highlights the interpretative tensions and methodological decisions intrinsic to archaeology. Focusing on traces facilitates critical reflection on preservation, documentation, and the contingency of archaeological knowledge production.