Key research themes
1. How can grounded theory methodologies be adapted and applied across diverse research paradigms including mixed methods and multi-paradigm approaches?
This theme explores the extension of grounded theory (GT) beyond its traditional qualitative boundaries to include mixed qualitative-quantitative datasets, multi-paradigm frameworks, and the integration of GT within diverse disciplines such as information systems and software development. It highlights methodological flexibility in GT's iterative design, theoretical sampling, and coding, emphasizing how embracing both qualitative and quantitative data can enhance theory generation and the empirical relevance of studies. Understanding these adaptations is crucial for researchers seeking to harness GT's full potential across varied research contexts and to navigate challenges related to purist versus pragmatic usage of GT methods.
2. What are the foundational principles and methodological practices necessary to ensure rigor and quality in grounded theory research?
This theme centers on the core tenets and procedural rigor that underpin quality grounded theory (GT) research across its multiple iterations. It includes emphasis on constant comparative method, theoretical sampling, memo writing, delaying literature review, and criteria for evaluating GT such as fit, workability, relevance, and modifiability. Understanding these principles helps researchers navigate the complexity of GT's systematic data collection and analysis to produce credible, theoretically robust, and empirically grounded explanatory models.
3. How do different grounded theory approaches compare and what guidance exists for selecting and applying these variants appropriately?
This theme addresses the distinctions among the major GT variants—Glaserian (classical), Straussian (systematic), and constructivist (Charmazian)—with respect to philosophical underpinnings, coding procedures, data analysis stages, and theoretical outputs. It also considers the implications of such differences for novice researchers in terms of methodological fit, research aims, and ontological positioning. Clarifying these variants enables more informed methodological choices and strengthens the theoretical and practical relevance of GT studies.