Erika Romauli Nababan
Faculty of Law, Universitas Sembilanbelas November

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

Euthanasia Acts from the Perspective of Criminal Law and Human Rights Erika Romauli Nababan; Jusafri Jusafri; La Ode Awal Sakti; Irabiah Irabiah
Sangia Nibandera Law Research Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Current Issues in Law Enforcement in Indonesia
Publisher : Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Euthanasia in positive criminal law regulations in Indonesia has not been regulated firmly and specifically. And according to human rights, the act of euthanasia is a violation of a person's right to life. The act of euthanasia itself occurs because of the unbearable sufferinga person experiences due to a disease that has no hope of being cured. The patient or family will ask the doctor to carry out euthanasia because they have lost hope or the opportunity to be cured with other alternatives. Juridically, criminal law, the act of euthanasia is indirectly regulated in articles 304, 344 and 345 of the Criminal Code as well as articles 461 and 462 of Law number 1 of 2023 and in human rights the act of euthanasia is very contrary to a person'sright to life, the emergence of the act of euthanasia It has become a demand that euthanasia ispart of human rights, namely the right to die. This right to die is not regulated either in the 1945 Constitution, Law Number 39 of 1999, and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The new thing that can be stated is that the process of legislation and legal reform, especiallyregarding this action, must continue to be carried out based on Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, taking into account the religious and cultural normsthat apply in Indonesian society.