Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.751
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal Evidence Of Law
Ariyamang, Watcharee
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
The Silent Crisis: Exploring the Correlation Between Bullying and Suicidal Tendencies Among Adolescents in Java and Sumatra, Indonesia Dewanto, Aji Cokro; Widhowati, Siwi Sri; Ariyamang, Watcharee
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 3 No. 3 (2024): Journal Evidence Of Law (Desember)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v3i3.946

Abstract

Bullying is a critical global public health issue with well-documented impacts on adolescent mental health. In Indonesia, particularly in Java and Sumatra, the high prevalence of bullying presents a significant threat to youth, who are especially vulnerable during their developmental years. This paper explores the relationship between bullying and suicidal behaviors—namely suicidal considerations, planning, and attempts—among adolescents in these regions. A quantitative research design using both bivariate and multivariate statistical techniques, comprising a sample of 7,391 students sourced from the Global School Health Survey 2015, indicates that adolescents who experience bullying are significantly more likely to engage in suicidal tendencies including suicidal considerations, planning, and attempts. The findings emphasise the necessity for targeted interventions to mitigate bullying and promote mental health for adolescents. The paper concludes with recommendations for anti-bullying policies, mental health interventions and further research.
Citizenship, Statelessness, and the Constitution: A Critical Study of Legal Reform and International Obligations Taufiqurrahman, Taufiqurrahman; Suganda, Atma; Ariyamang, Watcharee
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Journal Evidence Of Law (Agustus)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v4i2.1595

Abstract

The phenomenon of statelessness is a serious challenge for national and international legal systems, especially when a country's constitution is unable to guarantee effective protection of the right to nationality. This article aims to explore the tension between constitutional sovereignty and international obligations in addressing statelessness, as well as analyze how domestic legal frameworks can be reformulated to be more inclusive. Using a normative legal method and a comparative approach, this study examines three jurisdictions—Indonesia, Myanmar, and Latvia—and identifies three patterns of state failure: legitimized legal exclusion, transitional ambiguity, and administrative neglect. The findings suggest that constitutions should be positioned as dynamic legal instruments capable of internalizing international human rights principles, rather than mere expressions of state sovereignty. Through a transformative constitutionalism approach, this article emphasizes the importance of citizenship law reform involving the establishment of independent adjudicative mechanisms and the harmonization of legislation with international conventions. The main contribution of this research is the development of a typological model of state failure and the formulation of a multilevel reform agenda as a foundation for the formulation of more just and accountable legal policies for stateless individuals.
Homologation Decision Against Creditors Who Did Participate in The Peace Agreement (Case Study: Decision Number 993 K/Pdt.Sus Bankruptcy/2019) Deswanta, Andi; Iriantoro, Agung; Ariyamang, Watcharee
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): Journal Evidence Of Law (Inpress Desember)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v4i3.1617

Abstract

Homologation decisions in the Debt Payment Obligation Postponement (PKPU) system have universal binding force which creates legal complexity, especially regarding the protection of creditors who do not participate in the peace agreement. This research analyzes the legal force of homologation decisions and protection mechanisms for non-participating creditors based on the Indonesian bankruptcy system through a case study of Supreme Court Decision Number 993 K/Pdt.Sus-Bankruptcy/2019. The research method used is normative legal research with statutory and conceptual approaches. The results showed that the homologation decision has a fundamental position as an instrument of judicial ratification that transforms the peace agreement into a court decision with an executorial title and universal binding force. Its legal legitimacy is obtained through the fulfillment of quorum and majority requirements in Article 281 of the PKPU Law which applies a dual majority requirement system. However, legal protection for non-participating creditors faces significant limitations as the principle of universal binding force creates complex legal implications, ranging from loss of contractual autonomy to changes in the legal status of receivables. Although there is a cassation remedy mechanism available, in judicial practice such protection is limited to procedural aspects with a high threshold for success, so that the Indonesian PKPU system prioritizes the efficiency of collective settlements over the substantive protection of minority creditors
Implementation Of Non Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture (NCBAF) in Efforts to Recover Assets Resulting from Corruption in The Oil Palm Planatation Sector in Indonesia Ramadani, Maidika; Mantovani, Reda; Ariyamang, Watcharee
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): Journal Evidence Of Law (Inpress Desember)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v4i3.1710

Abstract

Law enforcement in Indonesia's oil palm plantation sector faces various challenges, especially in terms of recovering assets resulting from corruption and environmental damage. Legal systems that rely on conviction-based asset forfeiture mechanisms are often slow and difficult to prove the origin of assets, thus incapable of reaching the full extent of the large ecological and economic losses. This journal examines the potential application of the Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture (NCBAF) mechanism as a faster and more effective alternative solution, especially in the case of corporations with complex ownership structures and illegal land conversion modes. Through jurisprudence analysis and regulatory studies, it was found that legal reform was needed, including amendments to the Asset Forfeiture Bill and clarification of legal phrases related to state losses, so that the asset recovery system can run more fairly and efficiently. This approach is expected to strengthen efforts to eradicate corruption and environmental damage, as well as support the overall recovery of state losses in Indonesia's oil palm plantation sector.
Co-Authors Agung Iriantoro Aji Cokro Dewanto Deswanta, Andi Mantovani, Reda Ramadani, Maidika Suganda, Atma Taufiqurrahman Taufiqurrahman Widhowati, Siwi Sri