Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Development of Teaching Materials Based on Pjbl-Abmh (Preserved Bioplastic Materials Set) To Improve Students' Creative Thinking Skills Auni, Anggita; Farida, Siti; Arfiansyah, Noval Ilham; Sari, Yurizka Melia
Jurnal Riset Pendidikan dan Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): JRPIPM ARPIL 2024
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jrpipm.v7n2.p 117-139

Abstract

This research describes the process and results of developing PJBL-ABMH-based learning tools to improve students' creative thinking abilities on set material. This research uses the Plomp development model to develop learning tools through teaching modules and project worksheets, setting material with the PJBL-ABMH project learning design. The trial was conducted on 6 grade 7 students at a junior high school in Surabaya, East Java. Data collection and analysis techniques are carried out using validation sheets to determine the validity of the learning tools tested on the validator. Pre-test and posttest sheets measure effectiveness regarding students' creative thinking abilities on set material. Apart from that, student response sheets are also used to determine the practicality of the learning tools that have been developed. Data analysis was carried out using the constant comparative method technique. The results of the data analysis showed that the learning tools obtained a validity criterion of 75.5%, and each was classified as valid. The n-gain was obtained at 0.736 for the effectiveness criteria, and each obtained high effectiveness criteria. The learning tools were efficient to implement, with an average student response of 90% for the project learning design. Thus, PJBL-ABMH-based learning tools are declared valid, effective, and practical.
DEVELOPING PSYCHOLOGY MATHEMATICS LEARNING MODULE WITH VIDEO FOR PRESERVICE TEACHERS IN PEDAGOGICAL COMPETENCE Kurniasari, Ika; Milla, Yulia Izza El; Yudha, Adinda Salshabilla; Auni, Anggita; Ismail, Ismail; Ekawati, Rooselyna
Journal of Learning and Technology Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): December 2023
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Terbuka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33830/jlt.v2i2.6785

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mengembangkan materi ajar untuk mata kuliah Psikologi Pembelajaran Matematika (PPM) dengan menggunakan model Plomp. Fokusnya adalah penggunaan modul ajar yang melibatkan video pembelajaran untuk mengevaluasi kemampuan pedagogik mahasiswa calon guru matematika setelah menjalani materi PPM. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa modul ajar yang dikembangkan sangat valid, menandakan bahwa pendekatan ini, yang melibatkan video pembelajaran, dapat efektif digunakan dalam konteks pengajaran Psikologi Pembelajaran Matematika. Temuan ini menyoroti keberhasilan integrasi teknologi dalam meningkatkan kualitas pembelajaran mata kuliah yang bersifat pedagogis. Penerapan modul ini diharapkan dapat memperkaya pengalaman belajar mahasiswa calon guru matematika, meningkatkan pemahaman mereka terhadap konsep psikologi pembelajaran matematika, dan akhirnya meningkatkan kualitas pengajaran matematika. Kesimpulannya, hasil penelitian ini memberikan landasan yang kokoh untuk implementasi bahan ajar Psikologi Pembelajaran Matematika yang efektif, sambil menunjukkan pentingnya pengembangan lebih lanjut untuk memastikan kesesuaian dan keberlanjutan dalam konteks pembelajaran yang dinamis.
Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Ill-Structured Problem Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Matematika pada Materi Aritmatika Sosial Auni, Anggita; Rahaju, Endah Budi
MATHEdunesa Vol. 13 No. 2 (2024): Jurnal Mathedunesa Volume 13 Nomor 2 Tahun 2024
Publisher : Program Studi S1 Matematika UNESA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/mathedunesa.v13n2.p468-498

Abstract

This study aims to describe the problem solving ability of students with different mathematical abilities (high, medium, low) in solving ill structured problems of social arithmetic material. This research used a qualitative approach with descriptive research type. For the research subject, the researcher chose three seventh grade students at Labschool Unesa 2 Junior High School with different levels of mathematical ability (high, medium, low) and the same gender. Researchers used math ability tests, problem solving tests, and interviews to collect data. The mathematics ability test data was analyzed based on the range of student ability grouping Ratumanan and Laurens (2006), the problem solving test data was analyzed using Polya's problem solving ability indicators, and the interview data was analyzed using data triangulation (data reduction, data presentation, conclusion drawing). The results show that students with high mathematical ability have analyzed the problem well because students can consider all solutions to the problems given and the assumptions made by students are relevant to real life. Students have also entered the category of good problem solving skills. Meanwhile, students with medium and low mathematics ability have not been able to analyze the problem well because students only think of part of the solution to the problem given and the assumptions made by students are not relevant to real life. Students with moderate mathematical ability fall into the category of fairly good problem solving ability. Then students with low mathematics ability fall into the category of poor problem solving ability. These results can be used as an evaluation in the learning process or a reference for further research.
Comparing Students' Problem-Solving Processes on Probability Tasks: Well-Structured and Ill-Structured Tasks Auni, Anggita; Kohar, Ahmad Wachidul
Journal of Mathematical Pedagogy (JoMP) Vol. 4 No. 2: July 2023
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jomp.v4n2.p57-73

Abstract

This study aims to describe the differences in the problem-solving abilities of well-structured problems and ill-structured problems models related to the concept of opportunity for Grade VIII junior high school students. Two students with the same mathematical abilities were selected to be subjects according to our research objectives. The results show that the two samples find it more difficult to solve well-structured problems than ill-structured problems. When at the stage of understanding the problem students need to read the questions repeatedly and when asked to retell the students can't do it well. In the questions of the type of well-structured problems subject 1 can only mention what is asked, but it is not appropriate to state the conditions needed to solve the problem and in subject 2 it is found otherwise, while in ill-structured problems it is not appropriate to write down what is known but write down what is asked with precise and knowing the requirements to solve the problem. Subject 1 uses logical and logical reasoning strategies. Then, subject 2 uses a trial and error strategy with logical reasoning. The two subjects carried out problem solving according to plan, carried out the re-checking stage, and were able to find solutions to problems that did not require calculations in them but could not find solutions to problems that contained calculations and had to be solved by utilizing the probability theorem. These results can be used as an evaluation in the learning process or a reference for further research.