Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.006
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL UNIZAR LAW REVIEW Ulil Albab
Ady Supryadi
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Kedudukan Peraturan Menteri Ditinjau Dari Hierarki Peraturan Perundang Undangan Di Indonesia Ady Supryadi; Fitriani Amalia
Unizar Law Review (ULR) Vol 4 No 2 (2021): Unizar Law Review
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Al-Azhar Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Peraturan Perundang-undangan adalah keputusan tertulis negara atau pemerintah yang berisi petunjuk atau pola tingkah laku yang bersifat dan mengikat secara umum. Termasuk di dalamnya adalah Peraturan Menteri atas dasar perintah dari undang-undang, meskipun Peraturan Menteri tidak termasuk di dalam hierarki peraturan perundang-undangan berdasarkan Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan, Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalis kedudukan Permen dalam hierarki peraturan perundang-undangan. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute Approcah) dan pendekatan konsep (Conceptual Approach) serta analasis deskriptif analitik. Hasil penelitian ditemukan bahwa kedudukan Peraturan Menteri tidak termasuk dalam hierarkhi Peraturan Perundang-Undagan, akan tetapi menjadi bagian dari peraturan perundang-undangan.
WACANA AMANDADEMEN KE V UUD 1945 DAN PENGHIDUPAN KEMBALI POKOK-POKOK HALUAN NEGARA (PPHN) Ady Supryadi; Rena Aminwara; Fahrurrozi Fahrurrozi; Edi Yanto
Unizar Law Review (ULR) Vol 5 No 1 (2022): Unizar Law Review
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Al-Azhar Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53726/ulr.v5i1.559

Abstract

This study aims to examine the implications of the fifth amendment to the 1945 Constitution and the re-enactment of the Basic Principles of State Policy (PPHN) as a substitute for the GBHN on the constitutional system. The research method used is normative by placing primary and secondary legal materials as a reference. The results of the study indicate that a limited amendment to the 1945 Constitution is not yet necessary, including in the case of restoring the MPR's authority to determine the PPHN (Points of State Policy) because the position of the MPR is no longer the highest state institution.
Tanggung Gugat ( Pertanggungjawaban ) Pemerintah di Indonesia dan Netherland Firzhal Arzhi Jiwantara; Anies Prima Dewi; Ady Supryadi
ULIL ALBAB : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol. 1 No. 7: Juni 2022
Publisher : CV. Ulil Albab Corp

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The liability in Indonesia is included as the Government's responsibility, namely as a compulsory compliance obligation of the state or government or government officials or other officials who carry out government functions as a result of an objection, a lawsuit, a judicial review, which is submitted by a person, the community, an entity civil law either through court settlement or out of court. In this case as a form of Government responsibility both in civil and administrative matters. While accountability or accountability of the Government in the Netherlands (civil law system) are known to several teachings regarding civil liability, namely: 1) Accountability based on mistakes (schuldaansprakelijkheid). 2) Liability based on an error with an inverse proof load (schuldaansprakelijkheid met omkering van de bewijslast). 3) Liability based on risk (risicoaansprakelijkheid). In the Dutch legal system the equivalent of strict liability is risk-aansprakelijkheid. Responsibility based on risk is a form of responsibility that is not based on the element of error for the following activities: 1) hazardous material management; 2) waste management installation; and 3) drilling mining activities. The Defendant is free from responsibility based on risk, if: 1) loss arises as a result of war; 2) losses due to extraordinary natural events; 3) losses due to obeying authority orders; 4) losses due to the victim's own actions; 5) losses due to third party actions.
Co-Authors Dewi, Anies Prima Edi Yanto Fahrurrozi Fahrurrozi Firzhal Arzhi Jiwantara Fitriani Amalia Rena Aminwara