Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 20 Documents
Search

RESTORATIVE JUSTICE IN THE SETTLEMENT OF TRAFFIC ACCIDENT CAUSING DEATH TOLL ACCORDING TO THE PERSPECTIVE OF CUSTOMARY JUDICIARY IN SANGGAU DISTRICT, WEST KALIMANTAN Marina Rona; Rachmad Safa’at; Abdul Madjid; Mohammad Fadli
Yustisia Jurnal Hukum Vol 9, No 1: April 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v9i1.39351

Abstract

This research aims to examine restorative justice in the settlement of traffic accidents caused by the death toll from the customary judiciary perspective in Sanggau Regency, West Kalimantan. The fact of the field shows that a customary judiciary is an option for indigenous people to settle traffic accidents that resulted in the death according to  customary decision. The customary judicial process is led by Pomuntuh Adat with deliberation for consensus involving the perpetrators/drivers and heirs of his family and heirs of the victim's family. Adat decision by punishing perpetrators to repay or reinstate victims losses due to criminal acts sanctioned the customary verdict where the perpetrators/drivers and heirs of the family pay customary fines to the heirs of the victim's family and also perform customary rituals as a form of recovery of natural balance. The matter of traffic accident that has been decided through the customary judiciary, it is not processed through the process through the state's prejustice. The research is an empirical legal research, using secondary data through literature studies. Primary Data was obtained through interviews where the results concluded that the settlement of a traffic accident resulting in a death toll in a customary judicial perspective is a real manifestation of restorative justice
Batasan Kewenangan Penyidik Anak Terkait Pelaksanaan Diversi dalam Proses Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana Anak Megah Novita Endriyanti; Nurini Aprilianda; Abdul Madjid
Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum Vol 9, No 2 (2018): December 2018
Publisher : University of Merdeka Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26905/idjch.v9i2.2259

Abstract

This paper aims to analyze the limits of the authority of the child investigator related to the implementation of diversion in the process of resolving cases of child crimes. To answer the purpose of this paper, normative legal research is used, using the legal approach and case. The results of the study indicate that child investigators in solving cases of child crimes can apply discretion related to the implementation of diversion. The authority limit for discretion of child investigators, namely the reason for implementing diversion that does not fulfill the implementation requirements in the SPPA Law, must be logical and reasonable, not for serious crimes such as criminal acts against the body and life, and not repetitive crimes. In the case of theft with weights, the results of which have been determined by the Chairperson of the Pasuruan City District Court, discretion is taken by the police with various considerations. One of them is because the perpetrators and the victims agreed that the case would be settled in a family manner because the perpetrator still had a brotherly relationship with the victim. Therefore, with several agreements the victims decided to settle the case outside the court process, namely diversion.How to cite item: Endriyanti, M., Aprilianda, N., Madjid, A. (2018). Batasan Kewenangan Penyidik Anak Terkait Pelaksanaan Diversi dalam Proses Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana Anak. (2), 204-213. doi:https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v9i2.2259
Akibat hukum terhadap jual beli tanah yang telah didahului perjanjian nominee dengan warga negara asing Norentia Ekunming Sari; Suhariningsih Suhariningsih; Abdul Madjid
Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum Vol 12, No 2 (2021): August 2021
Publisher : University of Merdeka Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26905/idjch.v12i2.5808

Abstract

This article has the intent and purpose of the nominee agreement regarding land rights in Indonesia. This happens because many foreign nationals, hereinafter referred to as foreigners, can own land in Indonesia, while positive law in Indonesia only allows Indonesian citizens who can own land ownership rights in Indonesia. The nominee agreement is legal smuggling that can result in land being returned to the state. However, in the Decision of the Denpasar District Court in 2013 Number 82/PDT.G/2013/PN.DPS, one of the judges' decisions is that land must be resold and the proceeds from the sale of land are divided between foreigners (benefactors) and Indonesian citizens (legal owners) as comparison in a case approach to analyze the sale and purchase of land that has been preceded by a nominee agreement in Indonesia. the action of the Plaintiff who is a foreigner to sell the land and buildings prior to the lawsuit is one of the considerations for the judge in deciding this case. In addition, Defendant I sold the land below the market price. Therefore, the unlawful acts committed by Defendant I and Defendant II over the sale and purchase of rights to the object of the dispute must be accounted for by the Defendants.How to cite item: Sari, N., Suhariningsih, S., Madjid, A. (2021). Akibat hukum terhadap jual beli tanah yang telah didahului perjanjian nominee dengan warga negara asing. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 12(2), 205-212. doi:https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v12i2.5808
LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF REGULATORY PROVISIONS ARTICLE 10 VERSE (5) LAW NO. 46 OF 2009 CONCERNING THE CORRUPTION CRIMINAL COURT Ahmad Fauzi; Abdul Madjid; Nurini Aprilianda; Prija Djatmika
Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum Vol 7, No 3 (2020): Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum
Publisher : UNISSULA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26532/jph.v7i3.12937

Abstract

The corruption criminal court is an institution that is given the authority to examine and decide corruption cases. The purpose of this study was to determine the juridical implications of the principle of the independence of the judicial power. This study uses a normative approach with quantitative analysis. The existence of a corruption court established on judicial power states that a special court can only be formed by a separate law. Then the corruption court is an institution that has the authority to examine and decide corruption cases. In its implementation, the composition of judges in the corruption court is divided into two, namely career judges and ad hoc judges. In its implementation, there are several things in the legislation that are contrary to the principle of independence of judicial power and violate the principle of freedom of judicial power, especially for ad hoc judges in the criminal court of corruption.
Rasio legis eksistensi pengadilan tindak pidana korupsi dalam sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia Ahmad Fauzi; Abdul Madjid; Nurini Aprilianda; Prija Djatmika
Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum Vol 12, No 1 (2021): April 2021
Publisher : University of Merdeka Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26905/idjch.v12i1.5779

Abstract

Corruption if allowed to have a real economic impact, namely unequal income and increasing poverty Corruption is a common problem that occurs in almost every country, the modus operandi of corruption is to use the authority and power to take advantage for personal gain or third parties, therefore to overcome corruption crimes need a way to tackle corruption crimes. This research is a legal research using the socio-normative approach. The data used are primary data and secondary data which were analyzed using quantitative analysis. The main aspect in tackling corruption crimes is to use a law enforcement approach, one of the approaches to law enforcement is to create a Corruption Crime Court as regulated in Law No. 46 of 2009 concerning the Corruption Crime Court as an institution in charge of examining and deciding cases of criminal acts of corruption. The position of the court for criminal acts of corruption actually has a strong legal standing in the Indonesian criminal justice system, and its existence is very important and urgent in tackling corruption crimes in Indonesia.How to cite item: Fauzi, A., Madjid, A., Aprilianda, N., Djatmika, P. (2021). Rasiolegis eksistensi pengadilan tindak pidana korupsi dalam sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 12(1), 11-20. doi:10.26905/idjch.v12i1.5779.
Confiscation Of Assets In Economic Crime Sulvia Triana Hapsari; Abdul Madjid; Nurini Aprilianda
Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2022): May 2022
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/aclj.v3i2.22185

Abstract

Corruption is an extraordinary crime so the punishment is the Primum Remedium. Economic Analysis of Law can be used to increase the efficiency of handling corruption crimes (TPK) to provide a level of efficiency and a deterrent effect. The formulation of the problem in this research is how is the economic analysis of law in maximizing the looted assets from the crime of corruption? This research is based on judicial normative. The data were collected using the search method and literature review. Conclusion Based on the economic analysis of law, the shift in the orientation of punishment in criminal acts of corruption from corporal punishment to a combination of corporal punishment, large fines, confiscation of assets, and impoverishment of perpetrators of criminal acts of corruption without diminishing the meaning of corporal punishment shows effectiveness and efficiency and will increase the deterrent effect for the perpetrator.
Perlindungan Hukum Korban Penipuan Transaksi Jual Beli Online Melalui Ganti Rugi Sebagai Pidana Tambahan Silvony Kakoe; Masruchin Ruba'i; Abdul Madjid
Jurnal Legalitas Vol 13, No. 02 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (557.012 KB) | DOI: 10.33756/jelta.v13i02.7612

Abstract

Abstrak Kewajiban ganti rugi terhadap korban pada dasarnya telah dapat dikatakan sebagai pemenuhan restorative justice dimana merupakan konsep keadilan yang sedang ingin dicapai dalam pembaharuan hukum pidana di Indonesia. Oleh karena itu tujuan penulisan ini untuk menguraikan pentingnya bentuk perlindungan hukum kepada korban penipuan transaksi jual beli online dilihat dari perspektif Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik sekaligus untuk mendeskripsikan apakah ganti rugi sebagai pidana tambahan dapat ditetapkan sebagai upaya melindungi korban penipuan melalui transaksi jual beli online. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam tulisan ini adalah penelitian yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan konseptual dan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Hasil penelitian dalam tulisan ini menunjukan bahwa Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik hanya mengatur tentang pidana pokok terhadap pelaku tindak pidana penipuan transaksi jual beli online dan tidak secara tegas mengatur tentang ganti rugi yang mestinya didapatkan oleh korban dari tindak pidana penipuan melalui transaksi jual beli online. Pentingnya ganti rugi dalam bentuk restutusi sebagai pidana tambahan agar supaya ganti rugi tidak hanya menjadi opsi untuk melindungi korban tetapi menjadi kewajiban untuk dipenuhi oleh setiap pelaku tindak pidana ketika tindak pidana yang dilakukannya berakibat kerugian bagi korban penipuan transaksi jual beli online. Abstract Obligation to compensate victims basically could be said as a fulfillment of restorative justice which is the concept of justice that is being achieved in the renewal of criminal law in Indonesia. Therefore , the purpose of this paper is to describe the importance of legal protection for victims of online trading transaction fraud from the perspective of the Information and Electronic Transaction Law, also to describe whether compensation as an additional crime can be determined as an effort to protect victims of fraud through online trading transactions. The research method used in this paper is juridical normative, used a conceptual and statute approach. The results of this study indicate that the Electronic Information and Transaction Law only regulated the principal crimes against the perpetrators of fraudulent acts of online trading transactions and did not explicitly regulate the compensation that should be obtained by victims of fraudulent criminal acts through online buying and selling transactions. The importance of compensation in the form of restutution as an additional crime so that compensation is not only being an option to protect victims but also as the obligation which should be fulfilled by every criminal offender when their crimes had disadvantaged the victims of fraudulent online trading transactions.
Confiscation of Assets in The Corruption Crime Sulvia Triana Hapsari; Abdul Madjid; Nurini Aprilianda
Journal of Social Science Vol. 3 No. 5 (2022): Journal of Social Science
Publisher : Syntax Corporation Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (366.15 KB) | DOI: 10.46799/jss.v3i5.425

Abstract

Corruption as an extraordinary crime so that the punishment is the Primum Remedium. Economic Analysis of Law can be used to increase the efficiency of handling corruption crimes (TPK) to provide a level of efficiency and a deterrent effect. The formulation of the problem in this research is how is the economic analysis of law in maximizing the looted assets from the crime of corruption? This research is based on judicial normative. The data were collected using the search method and literature review. Conclusion Based on the economic analysis of law, the shift in the orientation of punishment in criminal acts of corruption from corporal punishment to a combination of corporal punishment, large fines, confiscation of assets and impoverishment of perpetrators of criminal acts of corruption without diminishing the meaning of corporal punishment shows effectiveness and efficiency and will increase the deterrent effect for perpetrator.
Local Wisdom as the Basis for Determination of Legislation Related to Public Order Abdul Madjid
Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum Vol 14, No 2 (2023): August 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Merdeka Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26905/idjch.v14i2.10843

Abstract

This paper reviews how the mechanism for absorbing local wisdom values in the formation of criminal sanctions in the process of forming regional regulations in districts, namely Ponorogo, Magetan, and Madiun Regencies, East Java Province. This research is empirical legal research using a juridical-sociological approach. Based on the results of the discussion, local wisdom in the studied districts, which is characterized by sociological studies as a Mataraman cultural character, does not exist in the formation of local regulations on public order. It can be seen that there are differences in the determination of criminal sanctions in regional regulations regarding public order. This is because there is still a need for more specific regulations governing the mechanism for forming regional regulations to accommodate the interests of local wisdom to be contained in norms as sanctions in regional regulations. Thus, in the future, it is necessary to develop national standard parameters for making regional regulations and design a linkage mechanism between these standard mechanisms and the legal values of local life that live in society, which can bridge the two domains.How to cite item: Madjid, Abdul. “Local Wisdom as the Basis for Determination of Legislation Related to Public Order.” Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum 14 no. 2 (2023): 114-125. DOI: 10.26905/idjch.v14i2.10843.
Perluasan Tafsir Frasa Tahap Penyelidikan melalui Interprestasi Sistematis sebagai Solusi Perselisihan Prayudisial Suwitno Yutye Imran; Abdul Madjid; Apripari Apripari
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 23, No 3 (2023): September Edition
Publisher : Law and Human Rights Policy Strategy Agency, Ministry of Law and Human Rights of The Repub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/dejure.2023.V23.341-356

Abstract

This study examined two things; the first is related to the relationship between judicial disputes, legal protection, and the role of the preliminary investigator; the second is related to the expansion of the phrase of preliminary investigation stages in the Criminal Procedure Code through systematic interpretation. This study applied normative legal research methods specified on the type of legal research for in-concreto cases. To strengthen the study, a statutory approach, a case approach, and a theoretical approach were used. The results of the study found that the actions of preliminary investigator who were limited to carrying out preliminary investigation without paying attention to cases that had a direct relationship with the cases being investigated could not yet provide legal protection, because they opened up opportunities for judicial disputes to occur. Speaking of which, judicial disputes need to be avoided through the use of systematic interpretation carried out by preliminary investigator in the preliminary investigation stages to expand the interpretation of the phrase of preliminary investigation stages in the Criminal Procedure Code and its derivative regulations. The systematic interpretation referred to is carried out in a limited manner, by simply reading opportunities for civil lawsuits and state administrative requests from parties involved in the case being investigated. In addition, it ensured the similarity of the parties involved in criminal cases as well as civil cases or state administrative cases in question.