Articles
<![CDATA[Artikel Kehormatan: Sengketa Penanaman Modal antara Investor Melawan Pemerintah di Arbitrase ICSID ]]>
<![CDATA[Adolf, Huala]]>
<![CDATA[ PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 1, No 3 (2014): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Padjadjaran University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (639.502 KB)
<![CDATA[AbstrakPerhatian terhadap ICSID dewasa ini timbul kembali setelah beberapa investor menggugat pemerintah Indonesia di hadapan badan arbitrase ICSID. Tulisan ini mengupas konvensi yang melahirkan badan arbitrase ICSID, yaitu Konvensi ICSID atau Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States. Tulisan ini memaparkan pula latar belakang pemerintah Indonesia meratifikasi konvensi, berbagai sengketa penanaman modal yang melibatkan pemerintah Indonesia, dan pelajaran yang dapat dipetik dari adanya gugatan-gugatan oleh investor.Kata kunci: Konvensi ICSID, sengketa penanaman modal, modal asing, putusan arbitrase, gugatan investor. Investment Disputes between Investors and Indonesian Government in the ICSID ArbitrationAbstractThe attention to the ICSID arose among scholars and practitioners following the claims brought by the foreign investors against the government of Indonesia to the ICSID arbitration. This article discussed the ICSID Convention or the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States. This article also examined the background Indonesia ratified the Convention, the disputes involving Indonesia in ICSID Arbitration, and the lesson learned from the claims.Keywords: ICSID Convention, investment disputes, foreign capital, arbitration award, investor claims.DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v1n3.a1]]>
<![CDATA[FUNGSI LEMBAGA PENJAMIN SIMPANAN DALAM HUKUM PERBANKAN INDONESIA ]]>
<![CDATA[Jayadi, Hendri]]>;
<![CDATA[Adolf, Huala]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH) Vol 4, No 2 (2018): Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum dan Ilmu Sosial Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Singaraja ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (723.189 KB)
<![CDATA[Dalam praktek hukum perbankan, suatu bank dapat dicabut ijin usahanya dan mengalami likuidasi. Didalam proses likuidasi bank Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan berperan penting dalam menyelesaikan pengembalian dana simpanan para nasabah bank tersebut ketika bank mengalami likuidasi terkaitpembayaran klaim penjaminan simpanan nasabah bank yang dicabut izinnya, Lembaga Penjamin Simpananmemiliki hak untuk menggantikan posisi nasabah penyimpan tersebut (hak subrogasi) dalam pembagian hasil likuidasi bank. Pemberian kewenangan dan hak tersebut dimaksudkan untuk mengoptimalkan tingkat pemulihan (recovery rate) bagi Lembaga PenjaminSimpanan, agar keberlangsungan program penjaminan simpanan dapat terus dijaga.Lahirnya   Undang-undang   Nomor    24 Tahun  2004   tentang   Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan   menandai babak    baru sistem perbankan  nasional. Keberadaan  Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan ini    tidak   bisa    dilepaskan    dari   upaya peningkatan stabilitas sektor keuangan dan untuk memulihkan kepercayaan masyarakat terhadap sektor perbankan. Penelitian inidifokuskanpada peran dan fungsi Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan dalam melaksanakan tugas dan tanggungjawabnya untuk menjamin, melindungi dan memberikan kepastian hukum kepada masyarakat sebagai nasabah bank dalam likuidasi bankdalam hukum perbankan.                                          ]]>
<![CDATA[PUTUSAN SENGKETA LAUT CHINA SELATAN SERTA IMPLIKASI HUKUMNYA TERHADAP NEGARA DI SEKITAR KAWASAN TERSEBUT ]]>
<![CDATA[Darajati, Muhammad Rafi]]>;
<![CDATA[Adolf, Huala]]>;
<![CDATA[., Idris]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Vol 2, No 1 (2017): Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (356.271 KB)
<![CDATA[Salah satu perkembangan yang menarik mengenai keamanan global saat ini adalah isu sengketa Laut China Selatan antara Filipina dengan Tiongkok. Filipina telah membawa sengketa tersebut ke Permanent Court of Arbitration. Putusan dari Permanent Court of Arbitration mengatakan bahwa klaim Tiongkok mengenai nine dash line terbantahkan dan tidak memiliki dasar hukum. Akan tetapi Tiongkok menolak putusan tersebut dan tetap agresif di Laut China Selatan sehingga berpotensi menimbulkan instabilitas kawasan Laut China Selatan. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk melihat implikasi putusan Permanent Court of Arbitration bagi negara pihak dan negara sekitar kawasan Laut China Selatan. Penulis menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif dengan studi kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa negara pihak yang bersengketa harus melaksanakan dan menghormati putsan Permanent Court of Arbitration tersebut karena sudah menjadi sumber hukum internasional. Bagi negara di sekitar kawasan, putusan tersebut juga memiliki pengaruh di dalam menghadapi agresivitas Tiongkok dan pengaturan mengenai klaim maritim di kawasan Laut China Selatan.Kata kunci: Arbitrase, Implikasi Hukum, Sengketa Laut China Selatan AbstractOne of an interesting development about the global security now is the issue of territorial disputes in the South China Sea between Philippines and China. Philippines has brought the dispute to the Permanent Court of Arbitration. The ruling from Permanent Court of Arbitration said that China’s claim about a nine-dash line does not have a legal basis. However China rejects the ruling and remain aggressive in the South China Sea which might cause instability in South China Sea region. This research aims to look at the implications of the ruling of the Permanent Court of Arbitration for state parties and states around the South China Sea region. Authors use juridical normative research method with literature studies. This research shows that states parties have to implement and respect the ruling because it has already become the source of international law. For the state that located around the region, the ruling also has an effect to facing China’s aggressiveness and rules handling maritime claims in the South China Sea region.DOI: https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v2n1.1]]>
<![CDATA[Asymmetrical Arbitration Clauses: A Comparative Study of International and Indonesian Arbitration Law ]]>
<![CDATA[Lingkanaya, Jovanka]]>;
<![CDATA[Adolf, Huala]]>;
<![CDATA[Amalia, Prita]]>
<![CDATA[ Pandecta Research Law Journal Vol 16, No 1 (2021): June ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Negeri Semarang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15294/pandecta.v16i1.29522
<![CDATA[This article presents a study of the validity of asymmetrical arbitration clauses, a clause that combines arbitration and a choice of court option, in international commercial contracts. These clauses designate a method of dispute settlement that gives a more favorable position for one of the parties to a contract, hence, creating a debate on its validity on an international level. Despite the convenience the trend has brought in business, this form of arbitration clause has been called into doubt by courts in numerous jurisdictions. Unfortunately, Indonesia itself has yet to have a firm legal standing on this matter as asymmetrical arbitration clauses are not explicitly regulated by the Indonesian arbitration law. This research is conducted by exploring the relation between theories and practices concerning asymmetrical arbitration clauses through analyzing case law and provisions of international arbitration law and the Indonesian arbitration law, and are also analyzed through principles of international and Indonesian contract law. This article aims to provide an analysis regarding the legal effects of having asymmetrical arbitration clauses in commercial contracts and commercial arbitration. Lastly, this study offers a method of interpretation towards such clauses that favors their validity under both international arbitration law and Indonesian arbitration law.]]>
<![CDATA[Hukum International Sebagai Lex Causae oleh Badan Arbitrase Komersial Internasional ]]>
<![CDATA[Adolf, Huala]]>
<![CDATA[ Indonesian Journal of International Law ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UI Scholars Hub ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (685.078 KB)
<![CDATA[This article discusses whether international law may be applied as lex causae by arbitral body. The international instrument used as comparative study are the Model Arbitration Law 1985, UNCITRAL Arbitration RUles, the ICC Rules of Arbitration the ICSID Convention and the Indonesian National Law on Arbitration. The article suggest that although international law seems inappropriate to deal with commercial matters, in certain circumstances, it is possible.]]>
<![CDATA[URGENSI PEMBENTUKAN UNDANG-UNDANG TENTANG ARBITRASE INTERNASIONAL ]]>
<![CDATA[Huala Adolf]]>
<![CDATA[ Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 10 No 2 (2016) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Lampung ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v10no2.684
<![CDATA[AbstractThe Law No 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution contains provisions primarily on domestic arbitration. The provisions on international arbitration is scarce: it contains only 5 (five) articles which mostly regulate the international arbitration awards. This article suggested that Indonesia need a Law on International Commercial Arbitration.Keywords: Law, International Arbitration.AbstrakUU Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 Tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif PenyelesaianSengketa memuat ketentuan-ketentuan yang sebagian besar mengenaiarbitrase nasional. Ketentuan mengenai arbitrase internasional hanyaditemukan di dalam 5 (lima) pasalnya yaitu ketentuan mengenai putusanarbitrase internasional. Tulisan ini menyarankan agar Indonesia perlu segeramembuat UU Arbitrase Internasional.Kata Kunci: Undang-Undang, Arbitrase Internasional]]>
<![CDATA[Artikel Kehormatan: Sengketa Penanaman Modal antara Investor Melawan Pemerintah di Arbitrase ICSID ]]>
<![CDATA[Huala Adolf]]>
<![CDATA[ PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 1, No 3 (2014): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (639.502 KB)
<![CDATA[AbstrakPerhatian terhadap ICSID dewasa ini timbul kembali setelah beberapa investor menggugat pemerintah Indonesia di hadapan badan arbitrase ICSID. Tulisan ini mengupas konvensi yang melahirkan badan arbitrase ICSID, yaitu Konvensi ICSID atau Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States. Tulisan ini memaparkan pula latar belakang pemerintah Indonesia meratifikasi konvensi, berbagai sengketa penanaman modal yang melibatkan pemerintah Indonesia, dan pelajaran yang dapat dipetik dari adanya gugatan-gugatan oleh investor.Kata kunci: Konvensi ICSID, sengketa penanaman modal, modal asing, putusan arbitrase, gugatan investor. Investment Disputes between Investors and Indonesian Government in the ICSID ArbitrationAbstractThe attention to the ICSID arose among scholars and practitioners following the claims brought by the foreign investors against the government of Indonesia to the ICSID arbitration. This article discussed the ICSID Convention or the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States. This article also examined the background Indonesia ratified the Convention, the disputes involving Indonesia in ICSID Arbitration, and the lesson learned from the claims.Keywords: ICSID Convention, investment disputes, foreign capital, arbitration award, investor claims.DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v1n3.a1]]>
<![CDATA[FUNGSI LEMBAGA PENJAMIN SIMPANAN DALAM HUKUM PERBANKAN INDONESIA ]]>
<![CDATA[Hendri Jayadi]]>;
<![CDATA[Huala Adolf]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum Vol 4 No 2 (2018): Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Program Studi Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum dan Ilmu Sosial Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Singaraja ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.23887/jkh.v4i2.15444
<![CDATA[Dalam praktek hukum perbankan, suatu bank dapat dicabut ijin usahanya dan mengalami likuidasi. Didalam proses likuidasi bank Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan berperan penting dalam menyelesaikan pengembalian dana simpanan para nasabah bank tersebut ketika bank mengalami likuidasi terkaitpembayaran klaim penjaminan simpanan nasabah bank yang dicabut izinnya, Lembaga Penjamin Simpananmemiliki hak untuk menggantikan posisi nasabah penyimpan tersebut (hak subrogasi) dalam pembagian hasil likuidasi bank. Pemberian kewenangan dan hak tersebut dimaksudkan untuk mengoptimalkan tingkat pemulihan (recovery rate) bagi Lembaga PenjaminSimpanan, agar keberlangsungan program penjaminan simpanan dapat terus dijaga.Lahirnya Undang-undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2004 tentang Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan menandai babak baru sistem perbankan nasional. Keberadaan Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan ini tidak bisa dilepaskan dari upaya peningkatan stabilitas sektor keuangan dan untuk memulihkan kepercayaan masyarakat terhadap sektor perbankan. Penelitian inidifokuskanpada peran dan fungsi Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan dalam melaksanakan tugas dan tanggungjawabnya untuk menjamin, melindungi dan memberikan kepastian hukum kepada masyarakat sebagai nasabah bank dalam likuidasi bankdalam hukum perbankan. ]]>
<![CDATA[IMPLIKASI HUKUM ATAS PUTUSAN PERMANENT COURT OF ARBITRATION TERKAIT SENGKETA LAUT CHINA SELATAN TERHADAP NEGARA DI SEKITAR KAWASAN TERSEBUT ]]>
<![CDATA[Muhammad Rafi Darajati]]>;
<![CDATA[Huala Adolf]]>;
<![CDATA[Idris Idris]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Vol. 2 No. 1 (2017): Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Volume 2 Nomor 1 September 2017 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law Universitas Padjadjaran ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[ABSTRAKSalah satu perkembangan yang menarik mengenai keamanan global saat ini adalah isu sengketa Laut China Selatan antara Filipina dengan Tiongkok. Filipina telah membawa sengketa tersebut ke Permanent Court of Arbitration. Putusan dari Permanent Court of Arbitration mengatakan bahwa klaim Tiongkok mengenai nine dash line terbantahkan dan tidak memiliki dasar hukum. Akan tetapi Tiongkok menolak putusan tersebut dan tetap agresif di Laut China Selatan sehingga berpotensi menimbulkan instabilitas kawasan Laut China Selatan. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk melihat implikasi hukum putusan Permanent Court of Arbitration bagi negara pihak yang bersengketa dan negara di sekitar kawasan Laut China Selatan. Artikel ini hasil penelitian dengan metode penelitian yuridis normatif. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa negara pihak yang bersengketa harus melaksanakan dan menghormati putusan Permanent Court of Arbitration tersebut karena sudah menjadi sumber hukum internasional. Bagi negara di sekitar kawasan, putusan tersebut juga memiliki implikasi hukum di dalam menghadapi agresivitas Tiongkok dan pengaturan mengenai klaim maritim di kawasan Laut China Selatan bahwa klaim maritim hanya dapat dilakukan sesuai dengan ketentuan yang tercantum di dalam Konvensi Hukum Laut 1982.Kata kunci: arbitrase; hukum laut internasional; permanent court of arbitration; sengketa ABSTRACTOne of an interesting development regarding to the global security now is the issue of territorial disputes in the South China Sea between Philippines and China. Philippines has brought the dispute to the Permanent Court of Arbitration. The ruling from Permanent Court of Arbitration said that China’s claim about a nine-dash line does not have a legal basis. However China rejects the ruling and remain aggressive in the South China Sea which might cause instability in South China Sea region. This research aims to look at the implications of the ruling of the Permanent Court of Arbitration for state parties and states around the South China Sea region. This research use juridical normative research method with literature studies. This research shows that states parties have to implement and respect the ruling because it has already become the source of international law. For the state that located around the region, the ruling also has a legal implication to facing China’s aggressiveness and the regulation of maritime claims in the South China Sea region that maritime claims can only be made in accordance with the provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the SeaKeyword: arbitration; dispute; international law of the sea; permanent court of arbitration. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v2n1.1]]>
<![CDATA[The Legal Concept of Construction Dispute Resolution through Adjudication in Indonesia: A Comparative Study ]]>
<![CDATA[Ahmad Rizal]]>;
<![CDATA[Huala Adolf]]>;
<![CDATA[Djuhaendah Hasan]]>;
<![CDATA[Ida Nurlinda]]>
<![CDATA[ International Journal of Supply Chain Management Vol 10, No 6 (2021): International Journal of Supply Chain Management (IJSCM) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Journal of Supply Chain Management ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[This study aims to analyze (1) the dispute of construction service through adjudication in Malaysia and New South Wales, Australia; and (2) the legal conception of construction dispute through adjudication in Indonesia. The methodology used in this research was the normative legal jurisdiction with the statute, conceptual, comparison, and comparative approach. The results show that (1) the dispute of construction service through adjudication in Malaysia and New South Wales, Australia, is a legal process where the appointed adjudicator is responsible to solve the dispute between the conflicted parties. Furthermore, the adjudication process is carried out by assigning a dispute adjudication board. Since there is no obstruction in the fieldwork when this process is applied, therefore it is considered more effective; and (2) the legal conception of construction dispute through adjudication in Indonesia is preferable to reflect on CIPAA 2012 which is successfully applied in Malaysia.]]>
