Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

Law Making Treaties: The Implication of International Law towards Indonesia’s Legislations Rudi Natamiharja; Rudy Rudy; Chaidir Ali
Jambe Law Journal Vol 3 No 2 (2020)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Jambi University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/jlj.3.2.191-210

Abstract

In relation to promoting global issues in international forums, several sources of international law are formed. These formed laws are in the figure of law-making treaties, which are closely related to international regimes that influence the behavior of international actors. However, in developing countries, such as Indonesia, International law is considered the outermost layer of the legal order under national law, colonial law, religious law, and customary law. Thus, it is a challenge for international laws to be enforced in a broad society. Therefore to make international law hold an implementative power, the laws need to be adopted in the national law. This article aims to examine the implication of international laws, especially in international treaties towards Indonesia legislation. It is carried out by mapping a series of international treaties ratified and enacted through national laws in Indonesia. The results of this study demonstrates that until 2019 the Indonesian Government has bound itself in 302 agreements. From the 302 treaties, only 61 international treaties were Law-Making Treaty, and only UNCLOS 1982 has implicated by the Indonesian Government through Law No. 32 of 2014 concerning Maritime Law.
UPHOLDING THE ERGA OMNES PRINCIPLE: THE ROLE OF CONSTITUTIONAL COURT DECISIONS IN THE FORMATION OF INDONESIA'S NEW PENAL CODE: MENEGUHKAN PRINSIP ERGA OMNES: PERAN PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM PEMBENTUKAN KUHP BARU INDONESIA Ali, Chaidir; Meidiantama, Refi
Constitutional Law Society Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): March
Publisher : Center for Constitutional and Legislative Studies University of Bandar Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36448/cls.v4i01.102

Abstract

The erga omnes principle, denoting obligations owed universally rather than to specific parties, plays a crucial role in constitutional law and judicial review. In Indonesia, the Constitutional Court upholds this principle by ensuring its rulings have a binding effect on all legal actors and institutions. This paper examines how the Court's jurisprudence has shaped the new Indonesian Penal Code through landmark constitutional decisions. By analyzing key rulings that annulled provisions from the colonial-era Penal Code, this study explores the Court’s influence on legislative reform and human rights protections. Utilizing normative legal research methods, including statute, case, and conceptual approaches, this study assesses how the Constitutional Court enforces the erga omnes principle through judicial review. The findings reveal that while several unconstitutional provisions from the old Penal Code were removed, some were reintroduced in the new code with modifications, often as complaint-based offenses to balance legal certainty with free expression. Despite these revisions, concerns persist regarding the potential misuse of reintroduced provisions to suppress dissent. This study underscores the Constitutional Court’s role in safeguarding democracy by ensuring its decisions are universally applicable. However, challenges remain in enforcing compliance with its rulings. As Indonesia continues its legal evolution, ongoing judicial oversight will be essential to uphold constitutional supremacy, human rights, and the rule of law.
Acting Performance Evaluation Governor of Aceh in 2022 Based on Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) : Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), Acting Governor of Aceh: Achmad Marzuki, Strategic Policy, Strategic Program Ali, Chaidir; Rahmawati, Dian Eka
Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan Vol 15, No 1 (2024): February 2024
Publisher : Department of Government Affairs and Administration, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jsp.v15i1.350

Abstract

This research seeks to prove the hypothesis regarding the performance of the Acting Governor of Aceh using the framework of Key Performance Indicators. The measurement variables for the Main Performance Indicators are Adaptability to Change, Financial Management, Infrastructure Development, Public Service, and Stakeholder Satisfaction. Since June 2022, Aceh Province has become a new chapter of leadership after the Helsinki MoU from the Military, this is in contrast to the message of the struggle, that the Military has a place in the hearts of the Acehnese people. So the presence of the military in the Aceh leadership system is interesting to study from its performance during its tenure. This research uses a quantitative descriptive method with data sources from questionnaires via Google Forms with 100 respondents, and data processing is carried out using Smart PLS software. The results of this research show an R Square value of 0.705, thus it can be concluded that 70.5% of the variation in the performance of the Acting Governor of Aceh can be explained by the independent variables in the regression model. R Square identifies quality in the form of strong/medium/weak categories. Several KPI variables that have a significant influence on the performance of the Acting Governor of Aceh are financial management, public service, and stakeholder satisfaction, with P Values ​​of 0.011, 0.020, and 0.035, with these results the performance of the Acting Governor of Aceh was successful in achieving the Main Performance Indicators. Meanwhile, the variables adaptability to change and infrastructure development with P values ​​of 0.405 and 0.343 do not have a significant effect on the performance of the Acting Governor of Aceh on the KPI Indicators.
KLASIFIKASI TOPIK BERITA POLITIK MENGGUNAKAN MODEL LOGISTIC REGRESSION DAN FITUR BAG OF WORDS Ali, Chaidir
Jurnal Kecerdasan Buatan dan Teknologi Informasi Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): September 2025
Publisher : Ninety Media Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69916/jkbti.v4i3.375

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan mengembangkan model klasifikasi topik berita politik yang efisien dan interpretable untuk mengatasi tantangan pengelolaan informasi di era digital. Pendekatan ini memanfaatkan algoritma Logistic Regression yang dipadukan dengan representasi fitur Bag of Words (BoW) untuk mengotomatisasi proses pengelompokan berita. Model diimplementasikan menggunakan bahasa pemrograman Python. Proses dimulai dari pengumpulan dataset berita berbahasa Indonesia, dilanjutkan dengan preprocessing teks (case folding, tokenisasi, penghapusan stopwords, dan stemming). Representasi teks dilakukan dengan metode Bag of Words, kemudian data dibagi menjadi 80% untuk pelatihan dan 20% untuk pengujian. Model Logistic Regression dilatih dan dievaluasi menggunakan metrik akurasi, presisi, recall, F1-score, MSE, dan RMSE. Model menunjukkan performa yang kuat dengan akurasi 84% dan F1-score rata-rata 0,84 pada enam kategori topik (politik, ekonomi, hiburan, olahraga, bisnis, teknologi). Pada klasifikasi biner (Politik vs Non-Politik), model mencapai akurasi sempurna 100% dengan MSE dan RMSE 0,00. Visualisasi fitur mengonfirmasi bahwa model mampu mengidentifikasi kata kunci politik seperti “pemilu” dan “partai” secara konsisten. Penelitian membuktikan bahwa kombinasi Logistic Regression dan BoW merupakan solusi yang efektif, efisien, dan transparan untuk klasifikasi berita politik. Meskipun hasilnya sangat akurat, potensi overfitting akibat ukuran dataset yang kecil (215 sampel) perlu menjadi pertimbangan untuk pengembangan model di masa depan.
Formal Constitutional Review Paradox: The Law on Legislation Making between Legal Procedure and Constitutional Norms Ali, Chaidir; Fatmawati
As-Siyasi: Journal of Constitutional Law Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): As-Siyasi: Journal of Constitutional Law
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24042/as-siyasi.v51.27578

Abstract

This paper analyses the paradoxical status of the Law on Legislation Making (LOLM) as a benchmark in formal constitutional review of legislation in Indonesia. Although the 1945 Constitution mandates procedural regulation through Article 22A, it offers minimal substance on the formal techniques of law-making, delegating this authority to statutory legislation. This gap creates ambiguity in judicial practice, especially for the Constitutional Court in performing formal reviews. Employing normative legal research, this study combines statutory, case, and comparative approaches, and also by examining 67 Constitutional Court decisions from 2003–2024. The findings revealed that LOLM is increasingly used as an imperative benchmark in formal reviews, despite some judicial reluctance and interpretive contradictions. The paper highlights three key jurisprudential provide within Constitutional Court Decision No. 001-021-022/PUU-I/2003, No. 27/PUU-VII/2009, and No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020—which affirm LOLM’s normative authority in ensuring procedural compliance with the 1945 Constitution. Comparisons with constitutional practices in Jordan, Azerbaijan, Korea, Myanmar, and Türkiye show that legislative instruments is a legitimate judicial tool when constitutions are substantively incomplete. The research concludes that LOLM, although a statutory law, must be treated as a constitutionally imperative norm in formal judicial review. To preserve its legitimacy and legal stability, LOLM should regulate all technical aspects of legislative procedure comprehensively without sub-delegation to institutional regulations. LOLM must maintain fidelity to the 1945 Constitution principles while ensuring procedural rigor in legislative formation.