Ichlas, Rudy Iskandar
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF INDONESIA AND THAILAND Masykuri, Masykuri; Rustan, Ahmad; Ichlas, Rudy Iskandar; Umar, Wahyudi
Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 26, No 3: December 2024: Law and Justice in Digital Age
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/kanun.v26i3.32697

Abstract

The idea of revising the 1945 Constitution is likely to spark debate. Nevertheless, Article 37 of the 1945 Constitution has provided a mechanism for amendment, rather than replacement, of the constitution. The amendments to the 1945 Constitution are now mandatory, as previously decreed by the MPR leadership, which will be continued by the current leadership. This paper examines the role of public participation in the amendment of constitutions in Indonesia and Thailand. The study employs a normative legal research approach, utilizing statutes, conceptual frameworks, and comparative analyses. Data was collected from books, academic journals, relevant laws, and regulations. The results indicate that the forms of public participation in Indonesia and Thailand in the constitution-making and amendment processes are largely similar, including public hearings, working visits, socialization, seminars, workshops, and discussions. However, a notable difference exists in that Indonesia lacks explicit provisions for public participation in its constitutional amendment process, whereas Thailand has established clear regulations. It is recommended that Indonesia clearly regulate public participation as a procedure in its constitution-making and amendment processes.
THE IMPLEMENTATION OF KALOSARA CUSTOM IN MEDIATING MEDICAL DISPUTES Akib, Ma'ruf; Ichlas, Rudy Iskandar
Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum Vol 10, No 3 (2023): Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum
Publisher : UNISSULA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26532/jph.v10i3.33751

Abstract

This study aims to determine and analyze the constitutionality of Kalosara custom in mediating disputes between doctors and patients in Konawe Regency. The method in this research uses a sociological juridical approach. The results of this study are The role of the Kalosara as customary law has a broad scope as a legal sub-system in society, as the Kalosara is known to prioritize unity and peace through mediation by means of deliberation and consensus. The Sara Medulu procession carried out by doctors from Konawe Hospital came to the victim with the intermediary of a Tolea as a form of seriousness to settle by custom. Customary settlement with a family atmosphere makes both parties feel defeated by each other. This condition is far more beneficial than legal settlement through the litigation process where there are parties who are won and defeated.