The Four-Day Workweek

Should a Four-Day Workweek Be Adopted? (Quick Take)
print Print
Please select which sections you would like to print:
verifiedCite
While every effort has been made to follow citation style rules, there may be some discrepancies. Please refer to the appropriate style manual or other sources if you have any questions.
Select Citation Style
Feedback
Corrections? Updates? Omissions? Let us know if you have suggestions to improve this article (requires login).
Thank you for your feedback

Our editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article.

External Websites

For most of human history, work has been largely hunting and gathering, agrarian, and hand-based (cobblers, smiths, and the like), and work schedules have depended on demand, seasons, weather, and daylight hours.[1]

The Industrial Revolution (beginning in the 18th century) introduced social and economic change on a vast scale by introducing newly invented machinery, such as the combustion engine and the spinning jenny, that greatly accelerated productivity. These changes spurred the factory system and urbanization, displacing artisans and radically changing how workers worked. Many of them left their homes and farms for the factory, where working hours were set not by nature but by employers. The rise of mass production and the assembly line only exacerbated these workplace changes, often to the detriment of the worker.[1]

The worker exploitation that followed in the wake of the Industrial Revolution was felt throughout the industrialized world. Workers—including women and children, some as young as three—were notoriously mistreated. Estimates vary, but most experts agree that workers in the United Kingdom were required to work about 12 to 16 hours a day, six days a week—72 to 96 hours a week—in the 19th century. Estimates for the United States were slightly lower by 1830, totaling about 69 hours per week.[2][3][4][5]

Throughout the 1800s, workers, reformers, and labor unions lobbied against child labor and for shorter working hours (primarily an eight-hour workday) and safer working conditions, and many workers protested by going on strike. On May 19, 1869, Ulysses S. Grant released “Proclamation 182—Eight Hour Work Day for Employees of the Government of the United States,” which limited government “laborers, workmen, and mechanics” to eight-hour workdays and he encouraged the private sector to follow suit. Working Saturdays, however, remained common, meaning workers routinely only had one day off each week—Sunday. But this also soon changed, when in 1908, a New England mill became the first American factory to close on Saturdays, too, so Jewish workers could observe the Sabbath, thereby instituting a five-day workweek.[5][6][7]

In 1926, Henry Ford also enacted a five-day workweek—popularizing the concept of the two-day “weekend”—in Ford Motor Company factories, after previously having instituted an eight-hour workday. This shorter workweek was codified into law with the passage of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) of 1938. This act originally set the workweek at 44 hours per week but reduced it to 42 hours in 1939 and to the now-standard 40 in 1940; shorter workweeks were not only a key way of keeping more workers employed during the Great Depression, but employers also saw them as ways of reducing absenteeism and improving efficiencies—Henry Ford, for example, saw the shorter eight-hour work shifts as perfect for running his factories all day, for 24 hours. The FLSA officially made the two-day weekend a reality for American workers.[6][8][9][10][35][36]

The five-day (in-person, on-site) 40-hour workweek remained standard until the COVID-19 pandemic (beginning in March 2020), when working at home with flexible hours became commonplace. During and after the pandemic, many workers quit their jobs or refused to return to their offices after the work-at-home mandates had been lifted, leading observers to call this period the “Great Resignation.” Employees quit for many reasons, including fear and concern about COVID safety precautions, a desire for better pay and a better work-life balance, and a reassessment of personal priorities, especially in light of the increasing availability of at-home work. The popularity of remote work emboldened the post-pandemic push for a four-day workweek.[11][12]

In the United States, senators and representatives have introduced legislation to reduce the workweek to 32 hours many times since Rep. John Conyers (D-MI) first did so in 1985. More recently, Rep. Mark Takano (D-CA) and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) have both introduced the Thirty-Two Hour Workweek Act. Some observers have even predicted a shorter workweek. Famed economist John Maynard Keynes, who died in 1946, believed that a 15-hour workweek would be possible by 2030, all due to the improved efficiencies gained from evolving technology. [13][14][15][16][17][18][36]

Not waiting for guidance from the federal government, private companies have experimented with their own unique work schedules. These various schemes include:

  • 4-32: Employees work 32 hours in four days (8-hour days) and have one day off during the week (generally Friday). This is the work schedule most often referred to as a four-day workweek.
  • 4-10 (also called a compressed schedule): Employees work 40 hours in four days (10-hour days) and have one day off during the week (generally Friday).
  • 6-hour workdays: Employees work 6 hours per day for five days a week, totaling only 30 hours per week.
  • 9-80: Employees work 80 hours over nine days instead of ten and get every other Friday off.
  • 9-72: Employees work regular 8-hour days for 9 days, totaling 72 hours, and have every other Friday off.
  • Half-day Fridays: Employees have Friday afternoons off, which is a common schedule in the summer. [19][20]

There are even new work schedules demanding more, not fewer, weekly hours from workers. The 996 model is designed for hyper-productivity, especially in the tech industry, and requires employees to work from 9 am to 9 pm, six days a week, for a total of 72 hours per week. This model originated in China’s tech industry and was highly controversial, but some Silicon Valley tech companies and startups in the U.S. have also adopted this model. This workweek is associated with heavy stress and worker burnout.[34]

So, given that the five-day workweek was a response to the Industrial Revolution, is the four-day workweek more appropriate for the tech revolution? Explore the debate below.

The following is a ProCon Quick Take debate, an abbreviated version of our longer features. ProCon will expand on this topic in the future.

Pros and Cons at a Glance

PROSCONS
Pro 1: A four-day workweek offers employees a better work-life balance, which translates into better mental health and a happier workforce. Read More.Con 1: A four-day workweek increases pressure on employees, causing more, not less, physical and mental burnout. Read More.
Pro 2: A four-day workweek means employees and companies can focus on essential tasks rather than those of questionable value. Read More.Con 2: A fixed workweek of fewer hours is not the answer—workers want workplace flexibility and a quality work experience. Read More.
Pro 3: A four-day workweek is financially beneficial to companies. Read More.Con 3: A four-day workweek is not only impossible in many industries but will deepen the divide between white-collar and blue-collar workers. Read More.

Pro Arguments

 (Go to Con Arguments)

Pro 1: A four-day workweek offers employees a better work-life balance, which translates into better mental health and a happier workforce.

A six-month U.K. pilot program in 2022, involving some 2,900 workers, revealed that 62 percent found it easier to balance work with their social lives, 60 percent found it easier to balance work with care responsibilities, and 54 percent found it easier to balance work with household jobs. Similarly, employees reported lower levels of anxiety, fatigue, and sleep issues, along with better physical and mental health. As a result, there was a 65 percent reduction in sick and personal days taken. [21]

Put simply, healthy and happy employees are the best employees, and the four-day workweek can produce this very workforce. It also leads to greater worker retention, which is a boon to employers.

Pro 2: A four-day workweek means employees and companies can focus on essential tasks rather than those of questionable value.

“It is a commonplace observation that work expands so as to fill the time available for its completion,” noted British naval historian Cyril Northcote Parkinson in The Economist in 1955. In other words, more work time is not the key to better productivity, because the same task can fill an hour or a week.[22]

The average white-collar employee spends 21.5 hours a week in meetings, and 47 percent of employees believe meetings to be the biggest time-wasters at the office. Plus, the average employee is interrupted 56 times a day while at work.[23]

A four-day workweek can minimize this waste.

Pro 3: A four-day workweek is financially beneficial to companies.

As journalist Caroline Castrillon explains,

Businesses [with shorter work weeks] immediately eliminate a percentage of variable overhead expenses like electricity and energy consumption. For example, in the 2019 Microsoft Japan trial, electricity costs fell by 23%. Also, employees use fewer office supplies and equipment such as printers and copiers depreciate slower. Fewer work days also mean less frequent janitorial services. And if you factor in the daily perks that many businesses offer their employees, like snacks or free lunches, the cost savings increase even further.[24]

Additionally, employees are more likely to choose to work for and stay with a company that offers a four-day workweek, reducing employee turnover and employer costs.[24]

Con Arguments

 (Go to Pro Arguments)

Con 1: A four-day workweek increases pressure on employees, causing more, not less, physical and mental burnout.

As business professor Benjamin Laker argues,

For many employees, the expectation to deliver the same results in fewer hours means working at a faster pace, with little room for error or downtime. The pressure to perform can feel overwhelming, as there’s less flexibility to manage unforeseen tasks, unexpected meetings, or emergencies. Instead of fostering a relaxed, balanced atmosphere, the four-day workweek can intensify the stress to meet deadlines in a shorter time frame.[25]

What results from this crunch of work and time is a vicious cycle of “work-hard, crash-hard” that only exacerbates stress, illness, and fatigue, undermining the very goals of the four-day workweek.[25][26]

Con 2: A fixed workweek of fewer hours is not the answer—workers want workplace flexibility and a quality work experience.

A Gallup poll found that “the quality of the work experience has 2.5x to 3x the impact of the number of days or hours worked.” In other words, the four-day workweek can’t cure a poor work culture.[27]

The reality is that one-size-fits-all solutions like a four-day workweek don’t work for everyone. For example, Generation X (born between 1965 and 1980) prefers an efficient work environment and strongly dislikes long work days. Millennials (born between 1981 and 1996) tend to prefer technology-based accommodations and remote work but look for company “perks and culture.” And Generation Z (born between 1997 and the early 2010s) describes the traditional 40-hour, five-day workweek as “soul-sucking”—43 percent of Gen Zers have no desire to work such a schedule.[28][29][30][31][32]

Con 3: A four-day workweek is not only impossible in many industries but will deepen the divide between white-collar and blue-collar workers.

“It’s relatively easier for jobs that rely on knowledge work to move to a compressed schedule compared to jobs that rely on service work,” explains financial journalist Amy Fontinelle. “We wouldn’t want to see customer service or tech support, let alone hospitals and fire departments, take three days off per week with zero coverage—though allowing individual workers to have four-day weeks could be possible.” Becoming more efficient might not be feasible—for example there’s “a physical limit to how many items Amazon Warehouse employees can pick per hour or how many delivery locations a UPS driver can hit in a day.”[10]

Thus, the four-day workweek can really only be adopted by white-collar knowledge workers who can be out of the office one day a week without catastrophe. This will only deepen the socioeconomic divide between white-collar workers and blue-collar, service, and front-line employees.[33]

“I think 20% of the workforce, the most elite, are going to get more flexibility like unlimited vacation time and some of these things we’ve asked for,” says management professor Lindsey Cameron. “For the remainder of the American workforce, it’s going to stay mostly as it is.”[33]

Assessment Quiz

After reading the above debate, take our assessment quiz to test your knowledge of this issue. Good luck!

1-minute Survey

After reading this debate, take our quick survey to see how this information affected your opinion of this topic. We appreciate your feedback.

Discussion Questions

  1. Should companies adopt a four-day workweek? Why or why not?
  2. What schedule would you like to work? How would that schedule benefit the company and benefit you? Explain your answer.
  3. Explore the potential environmental impact of a four-day workweek. Do you think the change would benefit or harm the environment? Explain your answer.

Sources

  1. Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Industrial Revolution” (July 28, 2025), britannica.com
  2. Robert Whaples, “Hours of Work in U.S. History” (August 14, 2001), eh.net
  3. Striking Women, “Working Hours” (accessed August 17, 2025), striking-women.org
  4. BBC, “Industry—Textile Factories and Coal Mines” (accessed August 17, 2025), bbc.co.uk
  5. Museum of Tolerance, “Child Labor During the Industrial Revolution” (accessed August 17, 2025), museumoftolerance.com
  6. Literary Digest, “Henry Ford’s Five-Day Week” (accessed September 22, 2025), teachingamericanhistory.org
  7. Ulysses S. Grant, “Proclamation 182—Eight Hour Work Day for Employees of the Government of the United States” (May 19, 1869), presidency.ucsb.edu
  8. The New York Times, “Ford Establishes a 5-Day Week After Test; Expects Spur to Labor Will Bring 6-Day Pay” (September 26, 1926), timesmachine.nytimes.com
  9.  Jonathan Grossman, “Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938: Maximum Struggle for a Minimum Wage” (accessed August 17, 2025), dol.gov
  10. Amy Fontinelle, “The Impact of Working a 4-Day Week” (January 23, 2025), investopedia.com
  11. Maury Gittleman, “The ‘Great Resignation’ in Perspective” (July 2022), bls.gov
  12. U.S. Census Bureau, “The Number of People Primarily Working From Home Tripled Between 2019 and 2021” (September 15, 2022), census.gov
  13. U.S. Congress, “H.R.4728 - Thirty-Two Hour Workweek Act” (July 27, 2021), congress.gov
  14. U.S. Congress, “H.R.1332 - Thirty-Two Hour Workweek Act” (March 1, 2023), congress.gov
  15. U.S. Congress, “S.3947 - Thirty-Two Hour Workweek Act” (March 14, 2024), congress.gov
  16. U.S. Congress, “H.R.2933 - Fair Labor Standards Amendments of 1985” (July 22, 1985), congress.gov
  17. Evan Low and Cristina Garcia, “AB-2932 Workweek: Hours and Overtime” (March 24, 2022), leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
  18. Briana Scalia, “New York Considering Four-Day Workweek Pilot Programs” (May 19, 2025), foxnews.com
  19. Maryville University, “Shorter Workweek: Pros and Cons for Employee Productivity” (October 6, 2022), online.maryville.edu
  20. 4 Day Week, “4 Day Week Companies” (accessed August 19, 2025) 4dayweek.io
  21. Autonomy, “The Results Are In: The UK’s Four-Day Week Pilot” (February 2023), autonomy.work
  22. Tiffanie Wen, “The ‘Law’ That Explains Why You Can’t Get Anything Done” (May 21, 2020), bbc.com
  23. Abby McCain, “25+ Wasting Time at Work Statistics [2023]: How Much Time Is Wasted at Work” (December 15, 2022), zippia.com
  24. Caroline Castrillon, “Why Companies Should Consider a Four-Day Workweek” (October 17, 2021), forbes.com
  25. Benjamin Laker, “The Hidden Costs of the 4-Day Workweek and Its True Impact” (October 3, 2024), forbes.com
  26. Joshna Dsouza, “Drawbacks of a 4 Day Work Week: What to Consider” (October 13, 2024), zoetalentsolutions.com
  27. Jim Harter, “Is the 4 Day Work Week a Good Idea?” (September 9, 2021), gallup.com
  28. BetterHelp Editorial Team, “Generation X In The Workplace: Bridging The Gap” (January 31, 2025), betterhelp.com
  29. Silvija Martincevic, “Most Americans Are Hourly Workers—So Why Is 9-To-5 Still The Norm?” (July 7, 2025), forbes.com
  30. Intuit Credit Karma, “The Traditional 9 to 5 Is Soul Sucking for Gen Z, Study Finds” (February 22, 2024), creditkarma.com
  31. Deputy, “New Deputy Report Reveals 2025 Workforce Trends: Gen Z’s Dominance, AI’s Expansion, and the Rise of Micro-Shifts” (March 6, 2025), news.deputy.com
  32. Darshana Dutta, “Understanding Millennials in the Workforce” (July 26, 2025), vantagecircle.com
  33. Angie Basiouny, “Can the U.S. Embrace a Four-Day Workweek?” (August 22, 2022), knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu
  34. Kate Knibbs, “Silicon Valley AI Startups Are Embracing China’s Controversial ‘996’ Work Schedule” (July 23, 2025), wired.com
  35. BBC, “Who invented the weekend?” (accessed September 20, 2025), bbc.co.uk
  36. Alexi Horowitz-Ghazi, “How the 40-hour work week became the norm” (November 5, 2021), npr.org