Academia.eduAcademia.edu

A-not-B task

description6 papers
group1 follower
lightbulbAbout this topic
The A-not-B task is a cognitive psychology experiment used to assess object permanence and memory in infants. It involves hiding an object in one location (A) and then moving it to another location (B) while observing whether the infant searches for it in the original location (A) or the new location (B).
lightbulbAbout this topic
The A-not-B task is a cognitive psychology experiment used to assess object permanence and memory in infants. It involves hiding an object in one location (A) and then moving it to another location (B) while observing whether the infant searches for it in the original location (A) or the new location (B).

Key research themes

1. How do infants resolve the A-not-B task perseverative error through object-place binding and task switching?

Research in developmental psychology investigates why infants persistently search at location A even after seeing an object hidden at location B—the classic A-not-B error. The dominant explanation involves the cognitive mechanism of object-place binding and the necessity for infants to switch from object-centric to place-centric prioritization. The theme explores dynamic models that integrate spatial cognition, memory, and motor action to explain the developmental trajectory of resolving this error.

Key finding: This study posits an Association-Dissociation-Association (ADA) model where infants initially bind an object to its first location, but difficulty arises in dissociating that binding to establish a new location binding.... Read more
Key finding: Through re-analysis of prior infant data, this work demonstrates that infants improve by selectively focusing on accurately searching location B over trials rather than just perseverating at A. Notably, breast-fed infants... Read more
Key finding: Although focusing on artificial agents, this paper’s concept of managing interference between sequential goals relates to the cognitive problem infants face in the A-not-B task. The mechanism of protecting intermediate step... Read more

2. What cognitive and motivational factors influence infants’ and adults’ performance on challenging tasks akin to the A-not-B paradigm?

This theme covers the role of productive struggle, task difficulty perception, effort allocation, and psychological framing in tasks requiring sustained attention and cognitive control—elements relevant to the A-not-B task where infants must overcome perseverative tendencies. It also touches on motivation shaped by reference points and how perceived task difficulty modulates engagement and learning outcomes.

Key finding: This paper highlights that well-designed challenging tasks, which induce productive struggle, foster persistence and deeper engagement in learners. Translating to the A-not-B context, infants engaging in tasks just beyond... Read more
Key finding: Experiments show that knowledge of alternative, potentially easier or harder tasks creates reference points that modulate individuals’ psychological perceptions and effort exertion on assigned tasks. Applied to infant... Read more
Key finding: The study finds that informational and task conflicts in cognitive tasks can be modulated by instructions about stimulus proportions. Analogously, in the A-not-B task, infants’ task conflict—between habitual reaching and... Read more

3. How can task design and categorization improve understanding and prediction of difficulty in computational and problem-solving tasks related to cognitive development?

This theme addresses how formal task design, characteristics such as numerical structure, answer type, and domain concepts influence difficulty estimation and learning in tasks ranging from computer science challenges to reasoning problems analogous to A-not-B. Insights from process modeling, task parameterization, and task difficulty analyses inform how to scaffold learner engagement and cognitive challenge systematically.

Key finding: The Bebras contest aims to promote computational thinking via tasks that require no prior knowledge but enable knowledge construction through problem solving. The characteristics of tasks, their narrative covers, and... Read more
Key finding: This study applies automated analysis tools to contest task data to identify task properties that predict difficulty, finding that answer type and category (algorithms vs. data structures) correlate with success rates. The... Read more
Key finding: While focused on business process mining, this paper’s approach to identifying invisible or implicit steps in complex task sequences through efficient graph-based methods may inspire methods for analyzing implicit cognitive... Read more

All papers in A-not-B task

This study explores parental ethnotheories of children's temperament through mothers' responses to McDevitt and Carey's Behavioral Style Questionnaire (1978) for 299 children aged 3 to 8 years and interviews with their parents, in... more
This study explores parental ethnotheories of children's temperament through mothers' responses to McDevitt and Carey's Behavioral Style Questionnaire (1978) for 299 children aged 3 to 8 years and interviews with their parents, in... more
This study explores parental ethnotheories of children's temperament through mothers' responses to McDevitt and Carey's Behavioral Style Questionnaire (1978) for 299 children aged 3 to 8 years and interviews with their parents, in... more
The relation between perceptual and conceptual knowledge is a longstanding research question in developmental psychology. Here we tested children's dependence on figurative information with a reaction time/accuracy task. A sample of 151... more
Impulsivity and inattention are key constructs at the interface of temperament and domains of childhood behavioral problems, such as ADHD and ODD. A multi-method, multi-source assessment of impulsivity and inattention was conducted with... more
This study explores parental ethnotheories of children's temperament through mothers' responses to McDevitt and Carey's Behavioral Style Questionnaire (1978) for 299 children aged 3 to 8 years and interviews with their parents, in... more
by Emily Farran and 
1 more
Grouping by luminance and shape similarity has previously been demonstrated in neonates and at 4 months, respectively. By contrast, grouping by proximity has hitherto not been investigated in infancy. Th is is also the fi rst study to... more
Currently there are disputes in the infancy literature concerning when infants are first able to individuate physical objects by their features or properties. This issue has taken on new significance following claims that individuation by... more
Novelty seeking is viewed as adaptive, and novelty preferences in infancy predict cognitive performance into adulthood. Yet 7-month-olds prefer familiar stimuli to novel ones when searching for hidden objects, in contrast to their strong... more
The study investigates the relationship between array priming and the self-generated conceptualization of arrays in spatial memory. Nursery and primary school age children and adults (N = 70) were tested with an object and place memory... more
Bjork and Cummings (1984) showed that in the AB task infants aim for the correct place but search in adjacent places. In repeated trials, infants center and adjust their search to the correct hiding location. Re-analyses of previous... more
The A-not-B task is a marker task for infant development where an infant searches for an object being hidden twice, in two consecutive places. In two studies N = 70 infants plus 40 controls were tested in this task using two separate,... more
Previous research showed that drawing facilitates memory (Bruck, Melnyk, & Ceci, 2000; Butler, Gross, & Hayne, 1995; Gross & Hayne, 1999). The current study investigated whether drawing strategies could predict spatial memory. Children... more
Download research papers for free!