Gambaran Subjective Well Being Pada Tenaga Kerja Generasi y
JURISMA : Jurnal Riset Bisnis & Manajemen
https://doi.org/10.34010/JURISMA.V9I2.2280Abstract
Subjective well-being (SWB) is individual’s evaluation towards his life. SWB consists of three aspects: life satisfaction, positive affect and negative affect. A research conducted by Soto (2015) shows there is a reciprocal correlation between SWB and five personality dimensions (neuroticism, extraversion, openness, conscience and agreeableness). This research is consistent with a research by Diener that Subjective well-being is highly affected by personality (1999). A person with high SWB is high in extroversion, agreeableness, conscience and low in neuroticism. Objective of this research is to gain a picture of generation Y’s SWB through their personality assessment. This research involved 1107 participants, range from 18 – 37 years old. Personality is measured by NEO PI by Costa Mc Crae. The result shows generation Y is low in extraversion and openness; very low in agreeableness and conscience; and average in neuroticism. Based on the result we can conclude that generation Y’s SW...
References (43)
- tugas dan tanggung jawab sehari-hari di tengah gangguan sehari-hari. Saran untuk penelitian selanjutnya adalah menggunakan alat ukur tambahan seperti Subjective Well-Being Life Scale (SLWS) yang digunakan untuk mengukur secara langsung tingkat subjective well- being seseorang, melakukan perbandingan dengan generasi-generasi lainnya dan diperkuat dengan metode wawancara. DAFTAR PUSTAKA
- Albuquerque , I., Lima, M. P., Matos, M., & Figueiredo, C. 2012. The Interplay Among Levels of Personality:The Mediator Effect of Personal Projects Between the Big Five and Subjective Well-Being. Springer, 1-16.
- Ashton, M. C. 2017. Individual Differences and Personality. United Kingdom: Nikki Levy.
- Badan Pusat Statistik. 2016, April Kamis. Penduduk berumur 15 tahun keatas menurut golongan umur dan jenis kegiatan selama seminggu yang lalu. Retrieved from www.bps.go.id : https://www.bps.go.id/linkTabelStatis/view/id/974
- Cervone, D., & Lawrance, A. P. 2012. Kepribadian: Teori dan Penelitian . Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.
- Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. 1992. Normal Personality Assessment in Clinical Practice; The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 5-13.
- De Meuse, K. P., Mlodzik, K. J., & Korn. 2010. A second look at generational differences in the workforce: implication for HR and talent management. People and Strategy, 50-58.
- Diener, E. 2000. Subjective Well-Being: The science of happiness, and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 34-43.
- Diener, E. 2006. Guidelines for National Indicators of Subjective Well-Being and Ill-Being. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 151-157.
- Diener, E., & Diener, R. B. 2008. Unlocking the mysteries of Psychological Wealth. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
- Diener, E., Kanazawa, S., Suh, E. M., & Oishi, S. 2015. Why People Are in a Generally Good Mood. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 235-256.
- Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Oishi, S. 2005. Subjective well being; The science of happiness and life satisfaction. In Handbook of Positive Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Diener, E., Scollon, C. N., & Lucas, R. E. 2003. The evolving concept of Subjective Well-Being: The multifaceted nature of happiness. Elsevier, 187-220.
- Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. 1999. Subjective Well-Being:Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 276-302.
- Diener, E., & Tay, L. 2013. Rising Income and the Subjective Well-Being of Nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1-5.
- Durayappah, A. 2010. The 3P Model: A General Theory of Subjective Well-Being. Springer Science, 4-8.
- Gargiulo, S. 2012, July Senin. Generation Y set to transform office line. Retrieved from CNN: http://www.cnn. com/2012/08/20/business/generation-y-globaloffice-culture/
- Hurd, M., D., Rohwedder, S. & Tassot, C. 2014. The Impact of Employment Transitions on Subjective Well-Being. RAND Labor & Population, 2-10.
- Jalali, Z. & Heidari, A. 2016. The Relationship between Happiness, Subjective Well-Being, Creativity and Job Performance of Primary School Teachers in Ramhormoz City. International Education Studies, 45-50.
- Junaidy , D., & Surjaningrum, E. R. 2014. Perbedaan Kualitas Hidup pada Dewasa Awal yang Bekerja dan yang Tidak Bekerja. Psikologi Industri dan Organisasi, 102 -107.
- Joshanloo, M. 2019. Investigating the Relationships Between Subjective Well-Being and Psychological Well-Being Over Two Decades. American Psychological Association, 183- 185.
- Kahneman, D. & Krueger, A., B. 2006. Developments in the measurement of Subjective Well- Being. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3-13.
- Kerlinger, & Lee. 2000. Foundation of Behavioral Research (4th Ed). USA: Thomson Learning.
- Khalid, S. A., Nor, M. N., & Ismail, M. 2013. Organizational citizenship and generation y turnover intention. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 132-141.
- Kulaksizoglu, A., & Topuz, C. 2014. Subjective Well-Being Levels of University Students. Journal Of Educational and Instructional Studies, 25-29.
- Lu, L. 2014. The Relationship Between Subjective Well-Being and Psychosocial Variables in Taiwan. The Journal of Social Psychology, 351-354.
- Luntungan, I., Hubeis, A. V., Sunarti, E., & Mulyana, A. 2014. Strategi Pengelolaan Generasi Y di Industri Perbankan. Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 219-240.
- Martin, C. A. 2005. From high maintenance to high productivity What managers need to know about Generation Y. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 39-44.
- Meier, J., Austin, S. F., & Crocker, M. 2010. Generation Y in the Workforce: Managerial Challenges. The Journal of Human Resource and Adult Learning, 68-78.
- Nicola, P., Bravo, M., O. & Sarmiento, J., S. 2018. The Determinants of Subjective Well-Being in a Developing Country: The Ecuadorian Case. European Commisision, 2-7.
- Nofitri, N. F. 2009. Gambaran Kualitas Hidup Penduduk Dewasa di Jakarta. Skripsi, p. Depok: Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Indonesia.
- Oktariani, D., Hubeis, A. V., & Sukandar, D. 2017. Kepuasan Kerja Generasi Y dan Generasi X. Jurnal Aplikasi Bisnis dan Manajemen, 12-22.
- PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited . 2011, April. Millennials at work: Reshaping the workplace. Retrieved from PwC: http://pwc.to/1QiIHGJ
- Purwito, S., Nurtjahjanti, H., & Ariati, J. 2012. Hubungan Antara Subjective Well-Being dan Organizational Citizenship Behavior Pada Petugas Customer Service di Plasa Telkom Regional Division IV. Jurnal Psikologi Undip, 183-192.
- Quevedo , R. J., & Abella, M. C. 2011. Well-being and personality: Facet-level analyses. Personality and Individual Differences, 206-211.
- Salgado, J., F., Blanco, S. & Moscoso, S. 2019. Subjective Well-Being and Job Performance: Testing of a Suppressor Effect. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 93-98.
- Samman, E. 2007. Psychological and Subjective Well-Being: A Proposal for Internationally Comparable Indicators. Oxford Department of International Development, 4-10.
- Sarwono, S. W. 2012. Y Generation At Work. 5th Psychology For Non Psychologist Conferences. Bandung.
- Septiani, E. D. 2017. Faktor-faktor yang membentuk happiness pada generasi Y di tempat kerja. Undergraduate Thesis, p. Surabaya: Widya Mandala Catholic University.
- Soto, C. J. 2015, February. Is Happiness Good for Your Personality? Concurrent and Prospective Relations of the Big Five With Subjective Well-Being. Wiley Periodicals, pp. 45-55.
- Sugiyono. 2014. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
- Xi, X., Wang, Y. & Jia, B. 2017. The Effect of Social Support on Subjective Well-Being: Mediator Roles of Self-Esteem and Self-Efficacy. Atlantis Press, 493-497.
- Zotova, O., Y. & Karapetyan, L., V. 2015. Occupation as a Factor of Personality Subjective Well- Being. Russian Psychological Society, 126-130.