Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Photosynthesis and Water Relations in Brazilian Sugarcane

2010, The Open Agriculture Journal

https://doi.org/10.2174/1874331501004010031

Abstract

The expansion of sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) in Brazil has been boosted by the growing demand for bio-fuels all over the world and requires the occupation of new agricultural areas, including regions with unfavorable agro-climatic conditions. This observational study makes an analysis of the relationship between stomatal conductance, gas exchange and photosynthesis in sugarcane fields subject to different ambient conditions and growth phases. It was noted that the stomatal conductance had a much higher control on photosynthesis than on transpiration. Even under high stomatal conductance, photosynthesis maintained a high correlation to it. Sugarcane had an instantaneous water use efficiency of approximately 4.4 μmol of fixed CO 2 for each mmol of H 2 0 expended in transpiration. Lower leaf water potential, besides leading to an internal reduction of CO 2 , also reduced the instantaneous carboxylation efficiency, indicating that the photosynthesis apparatus was also affected. The variety RB92579, seems to have good water absorption system, because even under low leaf water potential, it maintained a good stomatal conductance, with a higher transpiration and photosynthesis than the others varieties. These results suggest that this variety has a tolerance mechanism to endure rather than avoid drought.

References (32)

  1. CONAB (Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento), 2007. Dis- ponível em: <http://www.conab.gov.br>. Acesso em 15 jan. 2007, 16: 30: 25.
  2. Castro PRC, Zambon S, Sansigolo MA, Beltrame JA, Nogueira MCS. Ação comparada de Ethrel, Fuzilade e Roundup, em duas épocas de aplicação, na maturação e produtividade da cana-de- açúcar SP 70-1143. Rev de Agric 2002; 77: 23-38.
  3. Van Dillewijn C. Botany of sugarcane. Waltham: Chronica Bo- tanica 1952; p. 371.
  4. Inman-Bamber NG, Smith DM. Water relations in sugarcane and response to water deficits. Field Crops Res 2005; 92: 185-202.
  5. Kingston G. Benchmarking yield of sugarcane from estimates of water use. Proc Austr Soc Sug Cane Technol 1994; 16: 201-9.
  6. Robertson MJ, Muchow RC. Future research challenges for effi- cient crop water use in sugarcane production. Proc Austr Soc Sug Cane Technol 1994; 16: 193-200.
  7. Deng X, Hu, ZA, Wang HX, Wen XG, Kuang TY. A comparison of photosynthetic apparatus of the detached leaves of the resurrec- tion plant Boea hygrometrica with its con-tolerant relative Chirita hererotrichia in response to dehydration and rehydration. Plant Sci 2003; 165: 851-61.
  8. Socias X, Correia MJ, Chaves M, Medrano H. The role of abscisic acid and water relations in drought responses of subterranean clo- ver. J Exp Bot 1997; 48: 1281-8.
  9. Oren R, Sperry JS, Katul GG, et al. Survey and synthesis of intra- and interspecific variation in stomatal sensitivity to vapour pressure deficit. Plant Cell Environ 1999; 22: 1515-26.
  10. Mcdermott JJ. Progress in analytic methods -more sophistication or back to basics?, Prev Veter Med 1995; 25: 121-33.
  11. Scheider SM, Gurevitch J, Eds. Design and analysis of ecological experiments. 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University 2001; p. 415.
  12. Leonardi C, Guichard S, Bertin N. High vapour pressure deficit influences growth, transpiration and quality of tomato fruits. Sci Horticult 2000; 84: 285-96.
  13. González-Rodríguez AM, Martín-Olivera A, Morales D, Jiménez MS. Physiological responses of tagasaste to a progressive drought in its native environment on the Canary Islands. Environ Exp Bot 2005; 53: 195-204.
  14. Larcher W. Ecofisiologia vegetal. São Carlos, SP, Brazil: Editora Rima 2000; p. 531.
  15. Marenco RA, Lopes NF. Fisiologia Vegetal: Fotossíntese, Respira- ção, Relações Hídricas e Nutrição Mineral. Viçosa, MG, Brazil: Editora UFV 2005; p. 451.
  16. Du YC, Nose A, Wasano K, Uchida Y. Responses to water stress of enzyme activities and metabolite levels in relation to sucrose and starch synthesis, the Calvin cycle and the C4 pathway in sugarcane (Saccharum sp.) leaves. Austr J Plant Physiol 1998; 25: 253-60.
  17. Angelocci LR . Água na Planta e Trocas Gasosas/Energéticas com a Atmosfera: Introdução ao tratamento biofísico. Piracicaba, MG, Brazil: Edição do Autor 2002; p. 272.
  18. Vu JCV, Allen JR LH, Gesch RW. Up-regulation of photosynthesis and sucrose metabolism enzymes in young expanding leaves of sugarcane under elevated growth CO2. Plant Sci 2006; 171: 123-31.
  19. Nipperta JB, Fayb PA, Knapp AK. Photosynthetic traits in C3 and C4 grassland species in mesocosm and field environments. Envi- ronm. Exp Bot 2007; 60: 412-20.
  20. Machado EC, Medina CL, Gomes MMA, Habermann G. Variação sazonal da fotossíntese, condutância estomática e potencial da água na folha de laranjeira 'valência'. Sci Agric 2002; 59: 53-8.
  21. Meinzer FC, Grantz DA, Smit B. Root signals mediate coordina- tion of stomatal and hydraulic conductance in growing sugarcane. Austr J Plant Physiol 1991; 18: 329-38.
  22. Roberts J, Nayamuth RA, Batchelor CH, Soopramanien GC. Plant- water relations of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) under a range of irrigated treatments. Agric Water Manag 1990; 17: 95- 115.
  23. Smit MA, Singels A. The response of sugarcane canopy develop- ment to water stress. Field Crops Res 2006; 98: 91-7.
  24. Meinzer FC, Plaut Z, Saliendra NZ. Carbon isotope discrimination, gas exchange, and growth of sugarcane cultivars under salinity. Plant Physiol 1994; 104: 521-6.
  25. Saliendra NZ, Meinzer FC, Perry M, Thom M. Associations be- tween partitioning of carboxylase activity and bundle sheath leaki- ness to CO2, carbon isotope discrimination, photosynthesis, and growth in sugarcane. J Exp Bot 1996; 47: 907-14.
  26. Silva JV, Mello-Ivo WMP, Gonçalves ER, Leão VL, Costa MMS, Pereira FRS. Distribuição do sistema radicular em variedades de cana-de-açúcar (Saccharum officinarum). In: 10 th Brazilian Confer- ence of Plant Physiology and 12 th Latin American Conference of Plant Physiology, Recife. CD-ROM 2005.
  27. Silva JV, Costa MMS, Gonçalves ER, Vieira RCS, Endres L, Fer- reira VM. Caracterização foliar de cana-de-açúcar. In: 10 th Brazil- ian Conference of Plant Physiology and 12 th Latin American Con- ference of Plant Physiology, Recife. CD-ROM 2005.
  28. Saliendra NZ, Meinzer FC. Genotypic, developmental and drought- induced differences in root hydraulic conductance of contrasting sugarcane cultivars. J Exp Bot 1992: 43: 1209-17.
  29. Mielke MS, Oliva MA, Barros NF, Penchel RM, Martinez CA, Almeida AC. Stomatal control of transpiration in the canopy of a clonal Eucalyptus grandis plantation. Trees 1999; 13: 152-60.
  30. Liu F, Andersen MN, Jacobsen SE, Jensen CR. Stomatal control and water use efficiency of soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) during progressive soil drying. Environ Exp Bot 2005; 54: 33-40.
  31. Agele S, Cohen SS, Assouline S. Hydraulic characteristics and water relations of net house-grown bell pepper as affected by irri- gation regimes in a Mediterranean climate 2006; 57: 226-35.
  32. Hattori T, Sonobe K, Inanaga S, et al. Short term stomatal re- sponses to light intensity changes and osmotic stress in sorghum seedlings raised with and without silicon. Environ Exp Bot 2007; 60: 177-82.