Durdle, 2020 - Google Patents

Insects as vectors of DNA in a forensic context

Durdle, 2020

Document ID
18151695963020273652
Author
Durdle A
Publication year
Publication venue
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Forensic Science

External Links

Snippet

Insects have historically been used in criminal investigations to provide information in relation to postmortem intervals (PMIs) but the field of forensic entomology is expanding. It is now recognized that insects can act as vectors of human and mammalian DNA through the …
Continue reading at wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com (other versions)

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by the preceding groups
    • G01N33/48—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by the preceding groups biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
    • G01N33/50—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
    • G01N33/53—Immunoassay; Biospecific binding assay
    • G01N33/5308—Immunoassay; Biospecific binding assay for analytes not provided for elsewhere, e.g. nucleic acids, uric acid, worms, mites
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by the preceding groups
    • G01N33/48—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by the preceding groups biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
    • G01N33/50—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
    • G01N33/5005—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving human or animal cells
    • G01N33/5008—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving human or animal cells for testing or evaluating the effect of chemical or biological compounds, e.g. drugs, cosmetics
    • G01N33/5082—Supracellular entities, e.g. tissue, organisms
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES OR MICRO-ORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q1/00—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or micro-organisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
    • C12Q1/02—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or micro-organisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving viable micro-organisms
    • C12Q1/025—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or micro-organisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving viable micro-organisms for testing or evaluating the effect of chemical or biological compounds, e.g. drugs, cosmetics
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES OR MICRO-ORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q1/00—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or micro-organisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
    • C12Q1/68—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or micro-organisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving nucleic acids
    • C12Q1/6876—Hybridisation probes
    • C12Q1/6888—Hybridisation probes for detection or identification of organisms
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES OR MICRO-ORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q1/00—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or micro-organisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
    • C12Q1/68—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or micro-organisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving nucleic acids
    • C12Q1/6802—General aspects

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Clare et al. Species on the menu of a generalist predator, the eastern red bat (Lasiurus borealis): using a molecular approach to detect arthropod prey
Durdle Insects as vectors of DNA in a forensic context
McInnes et al. Optimised scat collection protocols for dietary DNA metabarcoding in vertebrates
Symondson Molecular identification of prey in predator diets
Juen et al. Detecting predation and scavenging by DNA gut-content analysis: a case study using a soil insect predator-prey system
Alvarez Rojas et al. Assessing the contamination of food and the environment with Taenia and Echinococcus eggs and their zoonotic transmission
Pearce et al. Morphological and genetic factors shape the microbiome of a seabird species (Oceanodroma leucorhoa) more than environmental and social factors
King et al. INVITED REVIEW: Molecular analysis of predation: a review of best practice for DNA‐based approaches
Foltan et al. The significance of facultative scavenging in generalist predator nutrition: detecting decayed prey in the guts of predators using PCR
Zaidi et al. Can multiple‐copy sequences of prey DNA be detected amongst the gut contents of invertebrate predators?
Snider et al. Metabarcoding of stomach contents and fecal samples provide similar insights about Seaside Sparrow diet
Deksne et al. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in domestic pigs (Sus scrofa domestica) and wild boars (Sus scrofa) in Latvia
Sheppard et al. Infiltration by alien predators into invertebrate food webs in Hawaii: a molecular approach
Lefort et al. Noninvasive molecular methods to identify live scarab larvae: an example of sympatric pest and nonpest species in New Zealand
Srivathsan et al. Network analysis with either Illumina or MinION reveals that detecting vertebrate species requires metabarcoding of iDNA from a diverse fly community
McDonald et al. To pluck or not to pluck: the hidden ethical and scientific costs of relying on feathers as a primary source of DNA
Evens et al. DNA diet profiles with high‐resolution animal tracking data reveal levels of prey selection relative to habitat choice in a crepuscular insectivorous bird
Biondi et al. Innate olfactory responses of Asobara japonica toward fruits infested by the invasive spotted wing drosophila
Kuris et al. An experimental evaluation of host specificity: the role of encounter and compatibility filters for a rhizocephalan parasite of crabs
Saranholi et al. Testing and optimizing metabarcoding of iDNA from dung beetles to sample mammals in the hyperdiverse Neotropics
Subrata et al. Identifying prey of the Javan mongoose (Urva javanica) in Java from fecal samples using next-generation sequencing
Galan et al. The diet of commensal Crocidura olivieri (Soricomorpha: Soricidae): predation on co-existing invasive Mus musculus suggested by DNA metabarcoding data
Marks et al. Local ecology and multiple mating in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster
Herrero-García et al. Non-invasive surveillance of shared pathogens in the Eurasian brown bear (Ursus arctos) human interface
Graux et al. A comparison of live versus kill pitfall traps to assess the diet of carabids through a metabarcoding approach