CN102932205B - A kind of automated testing method of network service end interface - Google Patents

Abstract

The invention discloses an automatic test method and a test platform for a network server interface. The method includes: importing test case data; extracting and encapsulating the test case data; simulating a client to send a request to test the network server interface; monitoring Test process; record log; test result analysis, generate test report. The test platform includes a test management unit for importing and managing test case data; a test control unit for encapsulating test case data, simulating client requests, testing network server interfaces, and monitoring the test process; The data fed back by the test control unit generates logs and records alarms, error parameter values and location information; it is used to accumulate statistical counts based on the execution status of the test case data fed back by the test control unit and based on the expectations of the test management unit Analyze and automatically generate the test report unit of the test report.

Description

An automated testing method for network server interface

technical field

The invention relates to the field of automatic testing of network service interface functions, in particular to an automatic testing method and testing platform of the network service interface.

Background technique

At present, commercial software such as QTP and Winrunner are generally used for functional testing of network server interfaces, which are expensive and require testers to have the technology to use patented tools.

In addition, manual indirect testing can also be performed through the client requesting the server to confirm. However, for this testing method, if there are multiple input conditions and multiple data type combinations, manual testing is very cumbersome, error-prone, and insufficient.

Contents of the invention

The purpose of the present invention is to overcome the deficiencies in the prior art, to provide a kind of automatic test method and test platform of the network server interface, can simulate the client to request to issue instructions through this method, interact with the server, and realize the automatic test, so that for The test of the network server interface is more efficient, the operation is simpler, and the probability of error is smaller.

In order to achieve the above object, the automatic testing method of the network server interface is characterized in that it comprises the following steps:

Step 1: Import test case data;

Step 2: Extract test case data and encapsulate it;

Step 3: Simulate the client sending a request and test the network server interface;

Step 4: Monitor the test process;

Step 5: record the log;

Step 6: Analyze test results and generate test reports.

Preferably, said step 1 also includes the following steps,

Step 11: Initialize the test management unit, complete the basic configuration and drive operation of the test management unit;

Step 12: Importing preset test case data into the test management unit;

Step 13: Verify the correctness and completeness of the test case data, and prompt an error for the test case data that does not meet the execution conditions.

Preferably, in the step 2, the test control unit judges the intention of the called test case data by calling the test case data stored in the test management unit, and extracts specific data in the test case data, Then encapsulate specific data and generate test scripts.

Preferably, in the step 3, the test control unit calls the packaged test script, according to the specific data corresponding to the test script, calls the API combination of the test control unit, encapsulates it into an HTTP request, and simulates the B/S The request responds to the interaction process, and autonomously simulates the client to send a request to the target network server interface to be tested; the test control unit simulates the test scene according to the set test steps, and controls the steps and time of sending the request.

Preferably, in said step 4, after receiving said HTTP request, the target network server interface will return a result to the test control unit; said test control unit accepts the result returned by the target network server interface, and communicates with Expected value comparison; if the returned result is the same as the expected value, the write-back status is successfully marked to the test management unit, otherwise the write-back status fails to be marked to the test management unit; the test management unit accepts the returned status success mark or status failure mark, and update the execution status of the currently used test case data according to the feedback mark.

Preferably, in said step 5, an operation record log will be generated during the execution of the scene test, and the test control unit will record the alarm error information and the error information returned by the network server interface in the operation, and send it to A log unit, the log unit accepts the error information fed back by the test control unit, and performs log alarm recording.

Preferably, in said step 6, the test reporting unit accepts the execution status of the use case data fed back by the test control unit, and simultaneously obtains the preset status of the test management unit; Yes, count the execution status of all use case data and generate a test analysis report.

The automated testing platform of the network server interface is characterized in that the testing platform includes,

Test management unit for importing and managing test case data;

A test control unit for encapsulating test case data, simulating client requests, testing network server interfaces, and monitoring the test process;

A log unit for generating logs based on data fed back from the test control unit, and recording alarms, error parameter values and location information; and,

The test report unit is used for the execution status of the test case data fed back by the test control unit, based on the expectation of the test management unit, the cumulative statistical count analysis, and the automatic generation of test reports.

Preferably, the test platform further includes a constructing and deploying service unit to be tested for automatically constructing the network server interface to be tested, and deploying the service to be tested to the network server interface according to predetermined test conditions.

The beneficial effect of the present invention is that, the application of the automated testing method and testing platform of the network server interface can simulate the client request to issue instructions, interact with the server, and realize automated testing while reducing manual operations, so that the network service The test of the terminal interface is more efficient, the operation is simpler, and the probability of error is smaller; the cost of the test platform is low and the efficiency is high.

Description of drawings

Fig. 1 shows a flow chart of the automated testing method for the network server interface.

FIG. 2 shows a schematic block diagram of the automated testing platform for the network server interface.

detailed description

The present invention will be further described below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.

Fig. 1 shows the flow chart of the automated testing method of described network server interface 1, as shown in Fig. 1, the automated testing method of described network server interface 1, comprises the following steps:

Step 0: Prepare for the test;

Step 1: import test case data S1;

Step 2: extract test case data and package S2;

Step 3: Simulate the client sending a request, and test S3 on the network server interface 1;

Step 4: monitoring test process S4;

Step 5: record log S5;

Step 6: Analyze test results and generate a test report S6.

Specifically, in the step 0, two preparations need to be completed. The first is to prepare test data and test cases. Test data and test cases are based on the target plan of the test, and are completed by testers in advance. The test data and test cases of the present invention need to be prepared according to the Excel format requirements of the custom template, and the prepared use cases can be imported into the test Snap-in 2, the basic data that makes up the test.

Second, it is necessary to deploy the test environment, pre-run, build and deploy the service unit 6 to be tested, automatically build the network service to be tested, and deploy the service to be tested to the network test server interface according to the predetermined test conditions. It can be realized by using the existing third-party technology Hudson task modeling method, and the construction of test service is mainly to provide test objects for the test method of the present invention.

Said step 1 also includes the following steps,

Step 11: Initialize the test management unit 2, and complete the basic configuration and driving operation of the test management unit 2;

Step 12: Import preset test case data into the test management unit 2; the test management unit 2 manages the address of the service to be tested, the name of the interface to be tested, the interface status, the interface input data, the test checkpoint, and the checkpoint Expected value and other information;

Step 13: Verify the correctness and completeness of the test case data, and prompt an error for the test case data that does not meet the execution conditions.

In said step 2, the test control unit 3 judges the intent of the called test case data by calling the test case data stored in the test management unit 2, and extracts specific data in the test case data, and then Encapsulate specific data (interface name, interface status, interface parameter values, expected values, etc.) to generate test scripts.

In the step 3, the test control unit 3 calls the encapsulated test script, according to the specific data corresponding to the test script, calls the API combination of the test control unit 3, encapsulates it into an HTTP request, and simulates the request of the B/S , responding to the interaction process, autonomously simulating the client to send a request to the target network server interface 1 to be tested; the test control unit 3 simulates the test scene according to the set test steps, and controls the steps and time of sending the request.

In the step 4, after receiving the HTTP request, the target network server interface 1 will return a result to the test control unit 3; the test control unit 3 accepts the result returned by the target network server interface 1, and communicates with Expected value comparison; if the returned result is the same as the expected value, the write-back status is successfully marked to the test management unit 2, otherwise the write-back status failure is marked to the test management unit 2; the test management unit 2 accepts the feedback returned Status success mark or status failure mark, and update the execution status of the currently used test case data according to the feedback mark.

In the step 5, an operation record log will be generated during the execution of the scene test, and the test control unit 3 will record the alarm error information occurring in the operation and the error information returned by the network server interface 1, and send it to the log unit 4. The log unit 4 receives the error information fed back by the test control unit 3, and performs log alarm recording.

In said step 6, the test report unit 5 accepts the execution state of the use case data fed back by the test control unit 3, and simultaneously obtains the preset state of the test management unit 2; the test report unit 5 performs a cumulative comparison of the above two states Yes, count the execution status of all use case data and generate a test analysis report.

Fig. 2 shows a block principle diagram of an automated test platform of a network server interface 1, the test platform can utilize a test management unit 2 to manage data input, and through server adaptation, a test control sheet 3 simulates the client sending business request.

As shown in Figure 2, the automated test platform of the network server interface 1 includes a test management unit 2 for importing and managing test case data; 1. A test control sheet 3 for testing and monitoring the test process; a log unit 4 for generating logs based on the data fed back from the test control sheet 3, and recording alarms, error parameter values, and location information; 3 The execution status of the feedback test case data is based on the expectation of the test management unit 2, the cumulative statistics are counted and analyzed, and the test report unit 5 of the test report is automatically generated.

Specifically, the test management unit 2 is mainly responsible for importing and managing the imported test data, and managing the interface name, interface status, interface input data, test checkpoint, checkpoint expected value and use case execution result of the network server interface 1 to be tested. presets etc. This test management unit 2 can be implemented by encapsulating an Excel class, custom templates, intuitive and easy maintenance operations.

The test control unit 3 is mainly responsible for encapsulating test data and simulating client requests. The test control sheet 3 realizes the interaction with the test management unit 2 by calling the Excel class, automatically obtains the use case data and then combines and encapsulates it into an HTTP request, sends the request to the target server after adaptation, checks the return value, and then writes the execution result back to the test management Unit 2, feedback data to test report unit 5 and log unit 4 during use case execution, to generate logs and test reports.

The log unit 4 mainly generates logs according to the feedback data of the test control sheet 3, records alarms, error parameter values and location information, etc., and tracks and locates specific error locations.

The test report unit 5 is mainly based on the test execution status fed back by the test control sheet 3, and based on the expectations of the test management unit 2, the cumulative statistical counting analysis is performed, and the test report is automatically generated, and the output is output by combining an Excel table and a graph of a custom template.

Further, the test platform also includes a construction and deployment service unit 6 for automatically constructing the network server interface 1 to be tested, and deploying the service to be tested to the network server interface 1 according to predetermined test conditions. The construction and deployment of the service unit 6 to be tested can be realized by using the Hudson task modeling method of the existing third-party technology. Constructing the test service mainly provides test objects for the test method of the present invention.

In summary, the above are only preferred embodiments of the present invention, and are not intended to limit the implementation scope of the present invention. That is, all equivalent changes and modifications made according to the content of the patent scope of the present invention shall belong to the technical scope of the present invention.

Claims (2)

1. An automated testing method for a network server interface, comprising the following steps: Step 1: Import test case data; Step 2: Extract test case data and encapsulate it; Step 3: Simulate the client sending a request and test the network server interface; Step 4: Monitor the test process; Step 5: record the log; Step 6: Analyze test results and generate test reports; It is characterized in that: in the step 2, the test control unit judges the intention of the called test case data by calling the test case data stored in the test management unit, and extracts specific data in the test case data, Then encapsulate the specific data and generate test scripts; In the step 3, the test control unit calls the packaged test script, according to the specific data corresponding to the test script, calls the API combination of the test control unit, encapsulates it into an HTTP request, simulates the B/S request, and responds The interaction flow, autonomously simulates the client to send a request to the target network server interface to be tested; the test control unit simulates the test scene according to the set test steps, and controls the steps and time of sending the request; In said step 4, after the target network server interface receives the HTTP request, it will return a result to the test control unit; the test control unit accepts the result returned by the target network server interface, and compares it with the expected value ; If the returned result is the same as the expected value, write back the status success mark to the test management unit, otherwise write back the status failure mark to the test management unit; the test management unit accepts the feedback status success mark or status failure mark , and update the execution status of the currently used test case data according to the feedback mark; In said step 5, an operation record log will be generated during the execution of the scene test, and the test control unit will record the alarm error information occurring in the operation and the error information returned by the network server interface, and send it to the log unit. The log unit accepts the error information fed back by the test control unit, and performs log alarm recording; In said step 6, the test report unit accepts the execution state of the use case data fed back by the test control unit, and simultaneously obtains the preset state of the test management unit; the test report unit cumulatively compares the above two states, and counts all Execution status of use case data and generate test analysis report. 2. The automated testing method of the network server interface according to claim 1, characterized in that: said step 1 further comprises the following steps, Step 11: Initialize the test management unit, complete the basic configuration and drive operation of the test management unit; Step 12: Importing preset test case data into the test management unit; Step 13: Verify the correctness and completeness of the test case data, and prompt an error for the test case data that does not meet the execution conditions.