Skip to content

When replaying a v3 run on v4, don't pass the region #2431

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 21, 2025

Conversation

matt-aitken
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Aug 20, 2025

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 047d7c3

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 20, 2025

Walkthrough

  • Updated region-selection logic in apps/webapp/app/v3/services/replayTaskRun.server.ts.
  • Introduced ignoreRegion flag set when existingTaskRun.engine === "V1" or either existingEnvironment.type or authenticatedEnvironment.type is "DEVELOPMENT".
  • Region is set to undefined when ignoreRegion is true; otherwise set to existingTaskRun.workerQueue.
  • Comment updated to describe the new gating (V2 with non-development environments uses region).
  • No changes to function signatures or error handling.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Tip

🔌 Remote MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration is now available!

Pro plan users can now connect to remote MCP servers from the Integrations page. Connect with popular remote MCPs such as Notion and Linear to add more context to your reviews and chats.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch replay-v3-on-v4-bug

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)

Type @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Status, Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Status Page to check the current availability of CodeRabbit.
  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
apps/webapp/app/v3/services/replayTaskRun.server.ts (4)

61-67: If a queue override is provided, consider omitting region to avoid conflicting scheduling signals.

When overrideOptions.queue is set, passing region may be redundant or conflicting depending on scheduler semantics.

-    const shouldPassRegion =
-      existingTaskRun.engine === "V2" &&
-      existingEnvironment.type !== "DEVELOPMENT" &&
-      authenticatedEnvironment.type !== "DEVELOPMENT";
+    const shouldPassRegion =
+      existingTaskRun.engine === "V2" &&
+      existingEnvironment.type !== "DEVELOPMENT" &&
+      authenticatedEnvironment.type !== "DEVELOPMENT" &&
+      !overrideOptions.queue;

61-67: Make the decision observable with a debug log.

This helps diagnose “why didn’t this replay target a region?” in support scenarios, without changing behavior.

     const region = shouldPassRegion ? (existingTaskRun.workerQueue ?? undefined) : undefined;
+    logger.debug("Region decision for replay", {
+      region,
+      engine: existingTaskRun.engine,
+      sourceEnvType: existingEnvironment.type,
+      targetEnvType: authenticatedEnvironment.type,
+      queueOverride: overrideOptions.queue ?? undefined,
+    });

61-67: Add targeted tests around region gating.

Minimal coverage to lock this behavior:

  • V1 engine (both envs non-dev) → region omitted
  • V2 engine with any dev env → region omitted
  • V2 engine with both envs non-dev and workerQueue present → region passed
  • V2 engine with queue override → region omitted (if you adopt the suggestion above)

I can draft unit/integration tests for ReplayTaskRunService that stub Prisma and assert the options passed to TriggerTaskService.call. Want me to push a test file?


61-67: Only pass region for V2 engines and guard against a nullable workerQueue

To prevent inadvertently forwarding the region for future engine versions (e.g. “V3”) and avoid passing null into the downstream service, replace the current “ignoreRegion” logic with an explicit whitelist for "V2" and coalesce the potentially-null workerQueue to undefined.

Files to update:

  • apps/webapp/app/v3/services/replayTaskRun.server.ts (around lines 61–67)

Proposed diff:

-    // Only use the region from the existing run if V2 engine and neither environment is dev
-    const ignoreRegion =
-      existingTaskRun.engine === "V1" ||
-      existingEnvironment.type === "DEVELOPMENT" ||
-      authenticatedEnvironment.type === "DEVELOPMENT";
-    const region = ignoreRegion ? undefined : existingTaskRun.workerQueue;
+    // Only pass region when engine is exactly "V2" and neither environment is DEVELOPMENT
+    const shouldPassRegion =
+      existingTaskRun.engine === "V2" &&
+      existingEnvironment.type !== "DEVELOPMENT" &&
+      authenticatedEnvironment.type !== "DEVELOPMENT";
+    const region = shouldPassRegion
+      ? (existingTaskRun.workerQueue ?? undefined)
+      : undefined;

This ensures:

  • Future engines (beyond V2) won’t accidentally inherit the old region behavior.
  • The workerQueue field, which may be null, is safely converted to undefined.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

💡 Knowledge Base configuration:

  • MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f086626 and 047d7c3.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/webapp/app/v3/services/replayTaskRun.server.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (3)
**/*.{ts,tsx}

📄 CodeRabbit Inference Engine (.github/copilot-instructions.md)

**/*.{ts,tsx}: Always prefer using isomorphic code like fetch, ReadableStream, etc. instead of Node.js specific code
For TypeScript, we usually use types over interfaces
Avoid enums
No default exports, use function declarations

Files:

  • apps/webapp/app/v3/services/replayTaskRun.server.ts
{packages/core,apps/webapp}/**/*.{ts,tsx}

📄 CodeRabbit Inference Engine (.github/copilot-instructions.md)

We use zod a lot in packages/core and in the webapp

Files:

  • apps/webapp/app/v3/services/replayTaskRun.server.ts
apps/webapp/**/*.{ts,tsx}

📄 CodeRabbit Inference Engine (.cursor/rules/webapp.mdc)

apps/webapp/**/*.{ts,tsx}: In the webapp, all environment variables must be accessed through the env export of env.server.ts, instead of directly accessing process.env.
When importing from @trigger.dev/core in the webapp, never import from the root @trigger.dev/core path; always use one of the subpath exports as defined in the package's package.json.

Files:

  • apps/webapp/app/v3/services/replayTaskRun.server.ts
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (23)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (8, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (4, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (5, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (3, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (2, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (7, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (6, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (6, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (5, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (3, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / internal / 🧪 Unit Tests: Internal (1, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (7, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (4, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (8, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / packages / 🧪 Unit Tests: Packages (1, 1)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (2, 8)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 🧪 Unit Tests: Webapp (1, 8)
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (windows-latest - npm)
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (ubuntu-latest - npm)
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (ubuntu-latest - pnpm)
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (windows-latest - pnpm)
  • GitHub Check: typecheck / typecheck
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)

@matt-aitken matt-aitken merged commit 1087e5e into main Aug 21, 2025
31 checks passed
@matt-aitken matt-aitken deleted the replay-v3-on-v4-bug branch August 21, 2025 09:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants