fixing link and formulas in combustion theory #183
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
pcarruscag
approved these changes
Aug 21, 2025
|
You can probably merge to master straight away |
Hi!! Thanks!! I will merge to master. |
|
There is indeed no turbulence-chemistry interaction but the Lewis number can vary, that is the preferential diffusion model of Nithin and Denis. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@bigfooted Hi Nijso, I hope you are doing well, I think these small changes fix some links in the combustion theory section. Please let me know what you think. Thanks in advance!!
Small note:$Le=1$
Should this sentence be modified? because with the preferential diffusion model implement by Evert the lewis number can be different than one if I am not mistaken.
At the moment there is no turbulence-chemistry interaction implemented in this approach and the Lewis number is assumed to be
It could be reformulated later. Please let me know what you think.