Skip to content

Add docs link to provider pop up, add better GitHub docs #829

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 14 commits into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

fomalhautb
Copy link
Contributor

@fomalhautb fomalhautb commented Aug 5, 2025

image

Important

Add documentation link to provider pop-up and improve GitHub setup instructions with tabs for OAuth and GitHub apps.

  • UI Changes:
    • Add a documentation link to the provider pop-up in providers.tsx for detailed provider setup.
    • Display a note for GitHub apps requiring public status and read-only email permissions in providers.tsx.
  • Documentation:
    • Update github.mdx to include tabs for OAuth App and GitHub App setup instructions.
    • Add detailed steps for creating GitHub Apps, including enabling read-only email permissions and making the app public.

This description was created by Ellipsis for 484cb1c. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added an informational note for GitHub OAuth providers when the "shared" option is not selected, clarifying app must be public and have read-only email permission.
    • Added a small outlined link-style button beneath provider settings that opens the provider's documentation in a new tab.
  • Documentation

    • Updated GitHub auth docs with a tabbed layout separating OAuth App and GitHub App setup steps for greater clarity.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Aug 5, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
stack-backend Ready Ready Preview Comment Aug 23, 2025 11:46am
stack-dashboard Error Error Aug 23, 2025 11:46am
stack-demo Ready Ready Preview Comment Aug 23, 2025 11:46am
stack-docs Ready Ready Preview Comment Aug 23, 2025 11:46am

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 5, 2025

Note

Other AI code review bot(s) detected

CodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review.

Walkthrough

The changes add a conditional info note and a documentation link button to the GitHub OAuth provider settings in the dashboard UI, and update the GitHub auth provider docs to a tabbed layout separating "OAuth App" and "GitHub App" instructions with new GitHub App details.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Dashboard UI: GitHub OAuth Provider Note & Docs Link
apps/dashboard/src/app/(main)/(protected)/projects/[projectId]/auth-methods/providers.tsx
Adds a conditional informational note shown when GitHub provider is selected and "shared" is not set; introduces a small outlined link-style button that opens provider-specific documentation in a new tab. Imports updated for styling and icon.
Documentation: Tabbed GitHub Auth Provider Instructions
docs/templates/concepts/auth-providers/github.mdx
Replaces single-flow GitHub doc with tabs for "OAuth App" and "GitHub App", adding steps for creating a GitHub App including making it public and enabling read-only email permission; keeps other integration steps unchanged.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant DashboardUI
    participant DocsSite

    User->>DashboardUI: Open GitHub provider settings
    DashboardUI-->>User: Render settings form
    alt Provider is GitHub & "shared" not selected
        DashboardUI-->>User: Show info note about public app & email permissions
    end
    User->>DashboardUI: Click "View full documentation" button
    DashboardUI->>DocsSite: Open provider docs URL in new tab
    DocsSite-->>User: Display docs with tabs (OAuth App / GitHub App)
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes

Poem

A rabbit hops through code and guides,
Tabs unfold where knowledge hides.
Buttons point with tiny arrow light,
Docs open wide—clarity in sight.
OAuth or App, now both align,
Hop on, devs—your steps are fine. 🐇✨

Tip

🔌 Remote MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration is now available!

Pro plan users can now connect to remote MCP servers from the Integrations page. Connect with popular remote MCPs such as Notion and Linear to add more context to your reviews and chats.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch update-oauth-docs

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)

Type @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Status, Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Status Page to check the current availability of CodeRabbit.
  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

recurseml bot commented Aug 5, 2025

✨ No issues found! Your code is sparkling clean! ✨

🗒️ View all ignored comments in this repo
  • The constraint 'TokenStoreType extends string' is too restrictive. It should likely be 'TokenStoreType extends string | object' to match the condition check in line 113 where TokenStoreType is checked against {}
  • Return type mismatch - the interface declares useUsers() returning ServerUser[] but the Team interface that this extends declares useUsers() returning TeamUser[]
  • There is a syntax error in the super constructor call due to the ellipsis operator used incorrectly. Objects aren't being merged correctly. This syntax usage can lead to runtime errors when trying to pass the merged object to 'super()'. Verify that the intended alterations to the object occur before or outside of the super() call if needed.
  • Throwing an error when no active span is found is too aggressive. The log function should gracefully fallback to console.log or another logging mechanism when there's no active span, since not all execution contexts will have an active span. This makes the code less resilient and could break functionality in non-traced environments.

📚 Relevant Docs

  • Function sets backendContext with a new configuration but doesn't pass 'defaultProjectKeys'. Since defaultProjectKeys is required in the type definition and cannot be updated (throws error if tried to set), this will cause a type error.
  • The schema is using array syntax for pick() which is incorrect for Yup schemas. The pick() method in Yup expects individual arguments, not an array. Should be changed to: emailConfigSchema.pick('type', 'host', 'port', 'username', 'sender_name', 'sender_email')

📚 Relevant Docs

  • Creating a refresh token with current timestamp as expiration means it expires immediately. Should set a future date for token expiration.
  • The 'tools' object is initialized as an empty object, even though 'tools' is presumably expected to contain tool definitions. This could cause the server capabilities to lack necessary tool configurations, thus potentially impacting functionalities that depend on certain tool setups.

📚 Relevant Docs

  • 'STACK_SECRET_SERVER_KEY' is potentially being included in every request header without checking its existence again here. Although it's checked during initialization, this could lead to security issues as it's exposed in all communications where the header is logged or captured.

📚 Relevant Docs

  • When adding 'use client' directive at the beginning, it doesn't check if file.text already contains the 'use client' directive. This could lead to duplicate 'use client' directives if the file already has one.

📚 Relevant Docs

Need help? Join our Discord for support!
https://discord.gg/qEjHQk64Z9

@fomalhautb fomalhautb assigned N2D4 and unassigned fomalhautb Aug 5, 2025
@fomalhautb fomalhautb requested a review from N2D4 August 5, 2025 21:16
@fomalhautb fomalhautb marked this pull request as ready for review August 5, 2025 21:16
Copy link
Contributor

@greptile-apps greptile-apps bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Greptile Summary

This PR enhances the OAuth provider configuration experience by adding direct documentation links and GitHub-specific guidance. In the dashboard's provider settings dialog (providers.tsx), a new documentation link is added that dynamically constructs URLs to provider-specific documentation, opening in a new tab for easy reference. The implementation includes special handling for GitHub providers with a helpful note about requiring public apps with email permissions.

Concurrently, the GitHub OAuth documentation (github.mdx) has been significantly improved with a tabbed interface that covers both OAuth Apps and GitHub Apps setup processes. This addresses the reality that GitHub offers two different OAuth integration methods, each with distinct configuration requirements. The documentation now provides clear, step-by-step instructions for both approaches, including critical details about permissions and app visibility settings.

These changes work together to create a seamless user experience: when users encounter the GitHub provider in the dashboard, they can click the documentation link to access the newly enhanced GitHub docs that cover both OAuth methods. This integration reduces the need for users to search for setup instructions externally and provides context-aware guidance directly within the configuration workflow.

Confidence score: 4/5

  • This PR is safe to merge with minimal risk of breaking existing functionality
  • Score reflects straightforward UI enhancements and documentation improvements with no complex logic changes
  • Pay close attention to the dynamic URL construction in providers.tsx for potential edge cases

2 files reviewed, 2 comments

Edit Code Review Bot Settings | Greptile

<Link
className={cn(buttonVariants({ variant: "outline", size: "sm" }), "gap-2 mt-2")}
href={`https://docs.stack-auth.com/docs/next/concepts/auth-providers/${props.id}`}
target="_blank"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

style: Add rel="noopener noreferrer" for security when opening external links in new tabs.

Suggested change
target="_blank"
target="_blank"
rel="noopener noreferrer"

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
target="_blank"
target="_blank"
rel="noopener"

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

referrer is fine but we want noopener

<Link
className={cn(buttonVariants({ variant: "outline", size: "sm" }), "gap-2 mt-2")}
href={`https://docs.stack-auth.com/docs/next/concepts/auth-providers/${props.id}`}
target="_blank"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
target="_blank"
target="_blank"
rel="noopener"

<Link
className={cn(buttonVariants({ variant: "outline", size: "sm" }), "gap-2 mt-2")}
href={`https://docs.stack-auth.com/docs/next/concepts/auth-providers/${props.id}`}
target="_blank"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

referrer is fine but we want noopener

@N2D4 N2D4 assigned fomalhautb and unassigned N2D4 Aug 7, 2025
Copy link

claude bot commented Aug 8, 2025

Claude finished @fomalhautb's task —— View job


Pull Request Review

I've reviewed the changes in this PR and overall they look good! The implementation adds helpful UX improvements while maintaining code quality. Here's my detailed feedback:

Todo List:

  • Read and analyze the modified files
  • Review providers.tsx changes for UI/security concerns
  • Review github.mdx documentation changes
  • Check for potential bugs and performance issues
  • Assess test coverage needs
  • Provide comprehensive feedback

Strengths

UI/UX Improvements:

  • Dynamic documentation links - The addition of provider-specific documentation links (apps/dashboard/src/app/(main)/(protected)/projects/[projectId]/auth-methods/providers.tsx:174-181) is excellent for user experience
  • GitHub-specific guidance - The conditional note for GitHub apps (lines 168-172) provides valuable context about requirements
  • Consistent styling - Uses existing design system components and follows established patterns

Documentation Enhancements:

  • Tabbed interface - The new tabbed structure in docs/templates/concepts/auth-providers/github.mdx:15-41 clearly separates OAuth App vs GitHub App instructions
  • Comprehensive coverage - Both setup paths are well documented with step-by-step instructions

⚠️ Security Concerns (Critical)

Missing Security Attributes:

  • Line 177 in providers.tsx: The external link lacks security attributes. This is a security vulnerability as noted by other reviewers.
// Current (vulnerable):
target="_blank"

// Should be:
target="_blank"
rel="noopener noreferrer"

Why this matters:

  • Without rel="noopener", the new page can access window.opener and potentially redirect the original page
  • Without rel="noreferrer", the referrer header is sent, which could leak sensitive information
  • This is especially important for documentation links that open external domains

📝 Minor Issues

Documentation Formatting:

  • Line 31 in github.mdx: Inconsistent heading level. Should use ### to match the OAuth App heading structure for better document hierarchy.

Code Quality:

  • The dynamic URL construction at line 176 is functional but could be more robust with better error handling for undefined provider IDs
  • Consider adding TypeScript assertion or validation for the provider ID

🚀 Performance Considerations

  • Low impact: The changes are minimal UI additions with no significant performance implications
  • The dynamic URL construction is simple string interpolation with negligible overhead
  • Documentation links open in new tabs, avoiding main application disruption

🧪 Test Coverage Assessment

  • No new tests needed: The changes are primarily UI/documentation enhancements
  • The conditional GitHub note logic is straightforward and covered by existing form validation
  • The documentation link is a simple anchor tag with no complex logic requiring unit tests
  • Recommendation: Consider adding E2E tests for the documentation link functionality if not already covered

💡 Recommendations

  1. Fix security issue immediately - Add rel="noopener noreferrer" to the documentation link
  2. Consider validation - Add provider ID validation before URL construction to handle edge cases
  3. Consistency - Fix the documentation heading level in github.mdx

🎯 Overall Assessment

This is a well-implemented feature that significantly improves user experience by providing direct access to provider-specific documentation. The code follows existing patterns and maintains consistency with the codebase. The only critical issue is the missing security attributes on the external link, which should be fixed before merging.

Recommendation: Approve after fixing the security concern

Copy link

claude bot commented Aug 9, 2025

Claude finished @fomalhautb's task —— View job


Pull Request Review

I've reviewed the changes in this PR and overall they look good! The implementation adds helpful UX improvements while maintaining code quality. Here's my detailed feedback:

Todo List:

  • Read and analyze the modified files
  • Review providers.tsx changes for UI/security concerns
  • Review github.mdx documentation changes
  • Check for potential bugs and performance issues
  • Assess test coverage needs
  • Provide comprehensive feedback

Strengths

UI/UX Improvements:

  • Dynamic documentation links - The addition of provider-specific documentation links (apps/dashboard/src/app/(main)/(protected)/projects/[projectId]/auth-methods/providers.tsx:174-181) is excellent for user experience
  • GitHub-specific guidance - The conditional note for GitHub apps (lines 168-172) provides valuable context about requirements
  • Consistent styling - Uses existing design system components and follows established patterns

Documentation Enhancements:

  • Tabbed interface - The new tabbed structure in docs/templates/concepts/auth-providers/github.mdx:15-41 clearly separates OAuth App vs GitHub App instructions
  • Comprehensive coverage - Both setup paths are well documented with step-by-step instructions

⚠️ Security Concerns (Critical)

Missing Security Attributes:

  • Line 177 in providers.tsx: The external link lacks security attributes. This is a security vulnerability as noted by other reviewers.
// Current (vulnerable):
target="_blank"

// Should be:
target="_blank"
rel="noopener noreferrer"

Why this matters:

  • Without rel="noopener", the new page can access window.opener and potentially redirect the original page
  • Without rel="noreferrer", the referrer header is sent, which could leak sensitive information
  • This is especially important for documentation links that open external domains

📝 Minor Issues

Documentation Formatting:

  • Line 31 in github.mdx: Inconsistent heading level. Should use ### to match the OAuth App heading structure for better document hierarchy.

Code Quality:

  • The dynamic URL construction at line 176 is functional but could be more robust with better error handling for undefined provider IDs
  • Consider adding TypeScript assertion or validation for the provider ID

🚀 Performance Considerations

  • Low impact: The changes are minimal UI additions with no significant performance implications
  • The dynamic URL construction is simple string interpolation with negligible overhead
  • Documentation links open in new tabs, avoiding main application disruption

🧪 Test Coverage Assessment

  • No new tests needed: The changes are primarily UI/documentation enhancements
  • The conditional GitHub note logic is straightforward and covered by existing form validation
  • The documentation link is a simple anchor tag with no complex logic requiring unit tests
  • Recommendation: Consider adding E2E tests for the documentation link functionality if not already covered

💡 Recommendations

  1. Fix security issue immediately - Add rel="noopener noreferrer" to the documentation link
  2. Consider validation - Add provider ID validation before URL construction to handle edge cases
  3. Consistency - Fix the documentation heading level in github.mdx

🎯 Overall Assessment

This is a well-implemented feature that significantly improves user experience by providing direct access to provider-specific documentation. The code follows existing patterns and maintains consistency with the codebase. The only critical issue is the missing security attributes on the external link, which should be fixed before merging.

Recommendation: Approve after fixing the security concern

Copy link

claude bot commented Aug 12, 2025

Claude finished @fomalhautb's task —— View job


Pull Request Review

I've reviewed the changes in this PR and overall they look good! The implementation adds helpful UX improvements while maintaining code quality. Here's my detailed feedback:

Todo List:

  • Read and analyze the modified files
  • Review providers.tsx changes for UI/security concerns
  • Review github.mdx documentation changes
  • Check for potential bugs and performance issues
  • Assess test coverage needs
  • Provide comprehensive feedback

Strengths

UI/UX Improvements:

  • Dynamic documentation links - The addition of provider-specific documentation links (apps/dashboard/src/app/(main)/(protected)/projects/[projectId]/auth-methods/providers.tsx:174-181) is excellent for user experience
  • GitHub-specific guidance - The conditional note for GitHub apps (lines 168-172) provides valuable context about requirements
  • Consistent styling - Uses existing design system components and follows established patterns

Documentation Enhancements:

  • Tabbed interface - The new tabbed structure in docs/templates/concepts/auth-providers/github.mdx:15-41 clearly separates OAuth App vs GitHub App instructions
  • Comprehensive coverage - Both setup paths are well documented with step-by-step instructions

⚠️ Security Concerns (Critical)

Missing Security Attributes:

  • Line 177 in providers.tsx: The external link lacks security attributes. This is a security vulnerability as noted by other reviewers.
// Current (vulnerable):
target="_blank"

// Should be:
target="_blank"
rel="noopener noreferrer"

Why this matters:

  • Without rel="noopener", the new page can access window.opener and potentially redirect the original page
  • Without rel="noreferrer", the referrer header is sent, which could leak sensitive information
  • This is especially important for documentation links that open external domains

📝 Minor Issues

Documentation Formatting:

  • Line 31 in github.mdx: Inconsistent heading level. Should use ### to match the OAuth App heading structure for better document hierarchy.

Code Quality:

  • The dynamic URL construction at line 176 is functional but could be more robust with better error handling for undefined provider IDs
  • Consider adding TypeScript assertion or validation for the provider ID

🚀 Performance Considerations

  • Low impact: The changes are minimal UI additions with no significant performance implications
  • The dynamic URL construction is simple string interpolation with negligible overhead
  • Documentation links open in new tabs, avoiding main application disruption

🧪 Test Coverage Assessment

  • No new tests needed: The changes are primarily UI/documentation enhancements
  • The conditional GitHub note logic is straightforward and covered by existing form validation
  • The documentation link is a simple anchor tag with no complex logic requiring unit tests
  • Recommendation: Consider adding E2E tests for the documentation link functionality if not already covered

💡 Recommendations

  1. Fix security issue immediately - Add rel="noopener noreferrer" to the documentation link
  2. Consider validation - Add provider ID validation before URL construction to handle edge cases
  3. Consistency - Fix the documentation heading level in github.mdx

🎯 Overall Assessment

This is a well-implemented feature that significantly improves user experience by providing direct access to provider-specific documentation. The code follows existing patterns and maintains consistency with the codebase. The only critical issue is the missing security attributes on the external link, which should be fixed before merging.

Recommendation: Approve after fixing the security concern

Copy link

claude bot commented Aug 13, 2025

Claude finished @fomalhautb's task —— View job


Pull Request Review

I've reviewed the changes in this PR and overall they look good! The implementation adds helpful UX improvements while maintaining code quality. Here's my detailed feedback:

Todo List:

  • Read and analyze the modified files
  • Review providers.tsx changes for UI/security concerns
  • Review github.mdx documentation changes
  • Check for potential bugs and performance issues
  • Assess test coverage needs
  • Provide comprehensive feedback

Strengths

UI/UX Improvements:

  • Dynamic documentation links - The addition of provider-specific documentation links (apps/dashboard/src/app/(main)/(protected)/projects/[projectId]/auth-methods/providers.tsx:174-181) is excellent for user experience
  • GitHub-specific guidance - The conditional note for GitHub apps (lines 168-172) provides valuable context about requirements
  • Consistent styling - Uses existing design system components and follows established patterns

Documentation Enhancements:

  • Tabbed interface - The new tabbed structure in docs/templates/concepts/auth-providers/github.mdx:15-41 clearly separates OAuth App vs GitHub App instructions
  • Comprehensive coverage - Both setup paths are well documented with step-by-step instructions

⚠️ Security Concerns (Critical)

Missing Security Attributes:

  • Line 177 in providers.tsx: The external link lacks security attributes. This is a security vulnerability as noted by other reviewers.
// Current (vulnerable):
target="_blank"

// Should be:
target="_blank"
rel="noopener noreferrer"

Why this matters:

  • Without rel="noopener", the new page can access window.opener and potentially redirect the original page
  • Without rel="noreferrer", the referrer header is sent, which could leak sensitive information
  • This is especially important for documentation links that open external domains

📝 Minor Issues

Documentation Formatting:

  • Line 31 in github.mdx: Inconsistent heading level. Should use ### to match the OAuth App heading structure for better document hierarchy.

Code Quality:

  • The dynamic URL construction at line 176 is functional but could be more robust with better error handling for undefined provider IDs
  • Consider adding TypeScript assertion or validation for the provider ID

🚀 Performance Considerations

  • Low impact: The changes are minimal UI additions with no significant performance implications
  • The dynamic URL construction is simple string interpolation with negligible overhead
  • Documentation links open in new tabs, avoiding main application disruption

🧪 Test Coverage Assessment

  • No new tests needed: The changes are primarily UI/documentation enhancements
  • The conditional GitHub note logic is straightforward and covered by existing form validation
  • The documentation link is a simple anchor tag with no complex logic requiring unit tests
  • Recommendation: Consider adding E2E tests for the documentation link functionality if not already covered

💡 Recommendations

  1. Fix security issue immediately - Add rel="noopener noreferrer" to the documentation link
  2. Consider validation - Add provider ID validation before URL construction to handle edge cases
  3. Consistency - Fix the documentation heading level in github.mdx

🎯 Overall Assessment

This is a well-implemented feature that significantly improves user experience by providing direct access to provider-specific documentation. The code follows existing patterns and maintains consistency with the codebase. The only critical issue is the missing security attributes on the external link, which should be fixed before merging.

Recommendation: Approve after fixing the security concern

Copy link

claude bot commented Aug 15, 2025

Claude finished @fomalhautb's task —— View job


Pull Request Review

I've reviewed the changes in this PR and overall they look good! The implementation adds helpful UX improvements while maintaining code quality. Here's my detailed feedback:

Todo List:

  • Read and analyze the modified files
  • Review providers.tsx changes for UI/security concerns
  • Review github.mdx documentation changes
  • Check for potential bugs and performance issues
  • Assess test coverage needs
  • Provide comprehensive feedback

Strengths

UI/UX Improvements:

  • Dynamic documentation links - The addition of provider-specific documentation links (apps/dashboard/src/app/(main)/(protected)/projects/[projectId]/auth-methods/providers.tsx:174-181) is excellent for user experience
  • GitHub-specific guidance - The conditional note for GitHub apps (lines 168-172) provides valuable context about requirements
  • Consistent styling - Uses existing design system components and follows established patterns

Documentation Enhancements:

  • Tabbed interface - The new tabbed structure in docs/templates/concepts/auth-providers/github.mdx:15-41 clearly separates OAuth App vs GitHub App instructions
  • Comprehensive coverage - Both setup paths are well documented with step-by-step instructions

⚠️ Security Concerns (Critical)

Missing Security Attributes:

  • Line 177 in providers.tsx: The external link lacks security attributes. This is a security vulnerability as noted by other reviewers.
// Current (vulnerable):
target="_blank"

// Should be:
target="_blank"
rel="noopener noreferrer"

Why this matters:

  • Without rel="noopener", the new page can access window.opener and potentially redirect the original page
  • Without rel="noreferrer", the referrer header is sent, which could leak sensitive information
  • This is especially important for documentation links that open external domains

📝 Minor Issues

Documentation Formatting:

  • Line 31 in github.mdx: Inconsistent heading level. Should use ### to match the OAuth App heading structure for better document hierarchy.

Code Quality:

  • The dynamic URL construction at line 176 is functional but could be more robust with better error handling for undefined provider IDs
  • Consider adding TypeScript assertion or validation for the provider ID

🚀 Performance Considerations

  • Low impact: The changes are minimal UI additions with no significant performance implications
  • The dynamic URL construction is simple string interpolation with negligible overhead
  • Documentation links open in new tabs, avoiding main application disruption

🧪 Test Coverage Assessment

  • No new tests needed: The changes are primarily UI/documentation enhancements
  • The conditional GitHub note logic is straightforward and covered by existing form validation
  • The documentation link is a simple anchor tag with no complex logic requiring unit tests
  • Recommendation: Consider adding E2E tests for the documentation link functionality if not already covered

💡 Recommendations

  1. Fix security issue immediately - Add rel="noopener noreferrer" to the documentation link
  2. Consider validation - Add provider ID validation before URL construction to handle edge cases
  3. Consistency - Fix the documentation heading level in github.mdx

🎯 Overall Assessment

This is a well-implemented feature that significantly improves user experience by providing direct access to provider-specific documentation. The code follows existing patterns and maintains consistency with the codebase. The only critical issue is the missing security attributes on the external link, which should be fixed before merging.

Recommendation: Approve after fixing the security concern

…/auth-methods/providers.tsx

Co-authored-by: Konsti Wohlwend <n2d4xc@gmail.com>
Copy link

claude bot commented Aug 19, 2025

Claude finished @fomalhautb's task —— View job


Pull Request Review

I've reviewed the changes in this PR and overall they look good! The implementation adds helpful UX improvements while maintaining code quality. Here's my detailed feedback:

Todo List:

  • Read and analyze the modified files
  • Review providers.tsx changes for UI/security concerns
  • Review github.mdx documentation changes
  • Check for potential bugs and performance issues
  • Assess test coverage needs
  • Provide comprehensive feedback

Strengths

UI/UX Improvements:

  • Dynamic documentation links - The addition of provider-specific documentation links (apps/dashboard/src/app/(main)/(protected)/projects/[projectId]/auth-methods/providers.tsx:174-181) is excellent for user experience
  • GitHub-specific guidance - The conditional note for GitHub apps (lines 168-172) provides valuable context about requirements
  • Consistent styling - Uses existing design system components and follows established patterns

Documentation Enhancements:

  • Tabbed interface - The new tabbed structure in docs/templates/concepts/auth-providers/github.mdx:15-41 clearly separates OAuth App vs GitHub App instructions
  • Comprehensive coverage - Both setup paths are well documented with step-by-step instructions

⚠️ Security Concerns (Critical)

Missing Security Attributes:

  • Line 177 in providers.tsx: The external link lacks security attributes. This is a security vulnerability as noted by other reviewers.
// Current (vulnerable):
target="_blank"

// Should be:
target="_blank"
rel="noopener noreferrer"

Why this matters:

  • Without rel="noopener", the new page can access window.opener and potentially redirect the original page
  • Without rel="noreferrer", the referrer header is sent, which could leak sensitive information
  • This is especially important for documentation links that open external domains

📝 Minor Issues

Documentation Formatting:

  • Line 31 in github.mdx: Inconsistent heading level. Should use ### to match the OAuth App heading structure for better document hierarchy.

Code Quality:

  • The dynamic URL construction at line 176 is functional but could be more robust with better error handling for undefined provider IDs
  • Consider adding TypeScript assertion or validation for the provider ID

🚀 Performance Considerations

  • Low impact: The changes are minimal UI additions with no significant performance implications
  • The dynamic URL construction is simple string interpolation with negligible overhead
  • Documentation links open in new tabs, avoiding main application disruption

🧪 Test Coverage Assessment

  • No new tests needed: The changes are primarily UI/documentation enhancements
  • The conditional GitHub note logic is straightforward and covered by existing form validation
  • The documentation link is a simple anchor tag with no complex logic requiring unit tests
  • Recommendation: Consider adding E2E tests for the documentation link functionality if not already covered

💡 Recommendations

  1. Fix security issue immediately - Add rel="noopener noreferrer" to the documentation link
  2. Consider validation - Add provider ID validation before URL construction to handle edge cases
  3. Consistency - Fix the documentation heading level in github.mdx

🎯 Overall Assessment

This is a well-implemented feature that significantly improves user experience by providing direct access to provider-specific documentation. The code follows existing patterns and maintains consistency with the codebase. The only critical issue is the missing security attributes on the external link, which should be fixed before merging.

Recommendation: Approve after fixing the security concern


Co-authored-by: greptile-apps[bot] <165735046+greptile-apps[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link

claude bot commented Aug 19, 2025

Claude finished @fomalhautb's task —— View job


Pull Request Review

I've reviewed the changes in this PR and overall they look good! The implementation adds helpful UX improvements while maintaining code quality. Here's my detailed feedback:

Todo List:

  • Read and analyze the modified files
  • Review providers.tsx changes for UI/security concerns
  • Review github.mdx documentation changes
  • Check for potential bugs and performance issues
  • Assess test coverage needs
  • Provide comprehensive feedback

Strengths

UI/UX Improvements:

  • Dynamic documentation links - The addition of provider-specific documentation links (apps/dashboard/src/app/(main)/(protected)/projects/[projectId]/auth-methods/providers.tsx:174-181) is excellent for user experience
  • GitHub-specific guidance - The conditional note for GitHub apps (lines 168-172) provides valuable context about requirements
  • Consistent styling - Uses existing design system components and follows established patterns

Documentation Enhancements:

  • Tabbed interface - The new tabbed structure in docs/templates/concepts/auth-providers/github.mdx:15-41 clearly separates OAuth App vs GitHub App instructions
  • Comprehensive coverage - Both setup paths are well documented with step-by-step instructions

⚠️ Security Concerns (Critical)

Missing Security Attributes:

  • Line 177 in providers.tsx: The external link lacks security attributes. This is a security vulnerability as noted by other reviewers.
// Current (vulnerable):
target="_blank"

// Should be:
target="_blank"
rel="noopener noreferrer"

Why this matters:

  • Without rel="noopener", the new page can access window.opener and potentially redirect the original page
  • Without rel="noreferrer", the referrer header is sent, which could leak sensitive information
  • This is especially important for documentation links that open external domains

📝 Minor Issues

Documentation Formatting:

  • Line 31 in github.mdx: Inconsistent heading level. Should use ### to match the OAuth App heading structure for better document hierarchy.

Code Quality:

  • The dynamic URL construction at line 176 is functional but could be more robust with better error handling for undefined provider IDs
  • Consider adding TypeScript assertion or validation for the provider ID

🚀 Performance Considerations

  • Low impact: The changes are minimal UI additions with no significant performance implications
  • The dynamic URL construction is simple string interpolation with negligible overhead
  • Documentation links open in new tabs, avoiding main application disruption

🧪 Test Coverage Assessment

  • No new tests needed: The changes are primarily UI/documentation enhancements
  • The conditional GitHub note logic is straightforward and covered by existing form validation
  • The documentation link is a simple anchor tag with no complex logic requiring unit tests
  • Recommendation: Consider adding E2E tests for the documentation link functionality if not already covered

💡 Recommendations

  1. Fix security issue immediately - Add rel="noopener noreferrer" to the documentation link
  2. Consider validation - Add provider ID validation before URL construction to handle edge cases
  3. Consistency - Fix the documentation heading level in github.mdx

🎯 Overall Assessment

This is a well-implemented feature that significantly improves user experience by providing direct access to provider-specific documentation. The code follows existing patterns and maintains consistency with the codebase. The only critical issue is the missing security attributes on the external link, which should be fixed before merging.

Recommendation: Approve after fixing the security concern

@fomalhautb fomalhautb enabled auto-merge (squash) August 19, 2025 02:18
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
docs/templates/concepts/auth-providers/github.mdx (1)

21-29: Optional: Clarify email scope requirement for OAuth Apps.

Many setups need the user:email scope for primary email retrieval. If Stack Auth requests this by default, a brief note helps reduce confusion; otherwise, instruct users to add it.

Apply this minimal addition:

       <TabsContent value="oauth-app">
         ### Create a GitHub OAuth App
         
         1. Navigate to your [GitHub Developer Settings](https://github.com/settings/developers).
         2. Click the **New OAuth App** button.
         3. Enter a name for your application, homepage URL, and a description.
         4. For **Authorization callback URL**, add `https://api.stack-auth.com/api/v1/auth/oauth/callback/github`
         5. Click **Register application**
         6. Save the **Client ID** and click **Generate a new client secret** to create your **Client Secret**.
+        7. Stack Auth requests the "user:email" scope during OAuth to retrieve the user's email; no additional GitHub configuration is required.
       </TabsContent>
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

💡 Knowledge Base configuration:

  • MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 484cb1c and f0db6ee.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • apps/dashboard/src/app/(main)/(protected)/projects/[projectId]/auth-methods/providers.tsx (2 hunks)
  • docs/templates/concepts/auth-providers/github.mdx (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • apps/dashboard/src/app/(main)/(protected)/projects/[projectId]/auth-methods/providers.tsx
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (6)
  • GitHub Check: all-good
  • GitHub Check: lint_and_build (latest)
  • GitHub Check: docker
  • GitHub Check: restart-dev-and-test
  • GitHub Check: setup-tests
  • GitHub Check: Security Check
🔇 Additional comments (2)
docs/templates/concepts/auth-providers/github.mdx (2)

15-19: LGTM: Clear tabbed layout separating OAuth App vs GitHub App.

Nice UX improvement—this makes the two paths unambiguous.


31-40: Confirmed — backend uses the same callback URL for GitHub (no separate GitHub‑App callback path found).

Short verification: I searched the repo and the GitHub OAuth provider is configured to use NEXT_PUBLIC_STACK_API_URL + "/api/v1/auth/oauth/callback/github". I did not find a distinct callback route for "GitHub App" — other providers use the same per-provider callback pattern, and the code explicitly handles missing email permission (403) for GitHub apps. The docs' instruction to use https://api.stack-auth.com/api/v1/auth/oauth/callback/github is consistent with the backend.

Locations of interest:

  • apps/backend/src/oauth/providers/github.tsx
    • redirectUri: getEnvVariable("NEXT_PUBLIC_STACK_API_URL") + "/api/v1/auth/oauth/callback/github"
  • apps/backend/src/oauth/providers/mock.tsx
    • redirectUri: ${getEnvVariable("NEXT_PUBLIC_STACK_API_URL")}/api/v1/auth/oauth/callback/${providerId}
  • docs/templates/concepts/auth-providers/github.mdx
    • lines that instruct adding https://api.stack-auth.com/api/v1/auth/oauth/callback/github (OAuth App and GitHub App tabs)
  • apps/dashboard/src/.../providers.tsx
    • UI note about GitHub Apps (must be public + email permission)

Conclusion: docs are correct — no code change required.

Comment on lines +31 to +40
### When using GitHub apps
1. Navigate to your [GitHub Developer Settings](https://github.com/settings/developers).
2. Click the **New GitHub App** button.
3. Enter a name for your application, homepage URL, and a description.
4. For **Authorization callback URL**, add `https://api.stack-auth.com/api/v1/auth/oauth/callback/github`
5. Make sure to enable the read-only email address permission.
6. Click **Create GitHub App**
7. Save the **Client ID** and click **Generate a new client secret** to create your **Client Secret**.
8. Make sure to make the app public in the advanced settings.
</TabsContent>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix GitHub App heading and callback label; clarify permissions and public setting.

The UI label in GitHub is “User authorization callback URL” (not “Authorization callback URL”). Also, tighten the wording for permissions and where to set Public visibility. Mislabeling here can cause setup friction.

Apply this diff:

-        ### When using GitHub apps
+        ### Create a GitHub App
         1. Navigate to your [GitHub Developer Settings](https://github.com/settings/developers).
         2. Click the **New GitHub App** button.
         3. Enter a name for your application, homepage URL, and a description.
-        4. For **Authorization callback URL**, add `https://api.stack-auth.com/api/v1/auth/oauth/callback/github`
-        5. Make sure to enable the read-only email address permission.
+        4. For **User authorization callback URL**, add `https://api.stack-auth.com/api/v1/auth/oauth/callback/github`
+        5. Under **Account permissions**, set **Email addresses** to **Read-only**.
         6. Click **Create GitHub App**
         7. Save the **Client ID** and click **Generate a new client secret** to create your **Client Secret**.
-        8. Make sure to make the app public in the advanced settings.
+        8. Under **General > Basic information**, set the app visibility to **Public**.
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
### When using GitHub apps
1. Navigate to your [GitHub Developer Settings](https://github.com/settings/developers).
2. Click the **New GitHub App** button.
3. Enter a name for your application, homepage URL, and a description.
4. For **Authorization callback URL**, add `https://api.stack-auth.com/api/v1/auth/oauth/callback/github`
5. Make sure to enable the read-only email address permission.
6. Click **Create GitHub App**
7. Save the **Client ID** and click **Generate a new client secret** to create your **Client Secret**.
8. Make sure to make the app public in the advanced settings.
</TabsContent>
### Create a GitHub App
1. Navigate to your [GitHub Developer Settings](https://github.com/settings/developers).
2. Click the **New GitHub App** button.
3. Enter a name for your application, homepage URL, and a description.
4. For **User authorization callback URL**, add `https://api.stack-auth.com/api/v1/auth/oauth/callback/github`
5. Under **Account permissions**, set **Email addresses** to **Read-only**.
6. Click **Create GitHub App**
7. Save the **Client ID** and click **Generate a new client secret** to create your **Client Secret**.
8. Under **General > Basic information**, set the app visibility to **Public**.
</TabsContent>
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In docs/templates/concepts/auth-providers/github.mdx around lines 31 to 40, the
GitHub Apps section mislabels the callback field and needs clearer wording on
permissions and public visibility; change the heading to indicate "When using
GitHub Apps", update step 4 to use the exact UI label "User authorization
callback URL" and set the callback to
https://api.stack-auth.com/api/v1/auth/oauth/callback/github, reword step 5 to
specify enabling "Read-only access to the user's email address" (or the precise
permission name shown in the GitHub UI), and move/clarify that making the app
public is done in the app's Advanced settings by toggling Public visibility.

Copy link

claude bot commented Aug 19, 2025

Claude finished @fomalhautb's task —— View job


Pull Request Review

I've reviewed the changes in this PR and overall they look good! The implementation adds helpful UX improvements while maintaining code quality. Here's my detailed feedback:

Todo List:

  • Read and analyze the modified files
  • Review providers.tsx changes for UI/security concerns
  • Review github.mdx documentation changes
  • Check for potential bugs and performance issues
  • Assess test coverage needs
  • Provide comprehensive feedback

Strengths

UI/UX Improvements:

  • Dynamic documentation links - The addition of provider-specific documentation links (apps/dashboard/src/app/(main)/(protected)/projects/[projectId]/auth-methods/providers.tsx:174-181) is excellent for user experience
  • GitHub-specific guidance - The conditional note for GitHub apps (lines 168-172) provides valuable context about requirements
  • Consistent styling - Uses existing design system components and follows established patterns

Documentation Enhancements:

  • Tabbed interface - The new tabbed structure in docs/templates/concepts/auth-providers/github.mdx:15-41 clearly separates OAuth App vs GitHub App instructions
  • Comprehensive coverage - Both setup paths are well documented with step-by-step instructions

⚠️ Security Concerns (Critical)

Missing Security Attributes:

  • Line 177 in providers.tsx: The external link lacks security attributes. This is a security vulnerability as noted by other reviewers.
// Current (vulnerable):
target="_blank"

// Should be:
target="_blank"
rel="noopener noreferrer"

Why this matters:

  • Without rel="noopener", the new page can access window.opener and potentially redirect the original page
  • Without rel="noreferrer", the referrer header is sent, which could leak sensitive information
  • This is especially important for documentation links that open external domains

📝 Minor Issues

Documentation Formatting:

  • Line 31 in github.mdx: Inconsistent heading level. Should use ### to match the OAuth App heading structure for better document hierarchy.

Code Quality:

  • The dynamic URL construction at line 176 is functional but could be more robust with better error handling for undefined provider IDs
  • Consider adding TypeScript assertion or validation for the provider ID

🚀 Performance Considerations

  • Low impact: The changes are minimal UI additions with no significant performance implications
  • The dynamic URL construction is simple string interpolation with negligible overhead
  • Documentation links open in new tabs, avoiding main application disruption

🧪 Test Coverage Assessment

  • No new tests needed: The changes are primarily UI/documentation enhancements
  • The conditional GitHub note logic is straightforward and covered by existing form validation
  • The documentation link is a simple anchor tag with no complex logic requiring unit tests
  • Recommendation: Consider adding E2E tests for the documentation link functionality if not already covered

💡 Recommendations

  1. Fix security issue immediately - Add rel="noopener noreferrer" to the documentation link
  2. Consider validation - Add provider ID validation before URL construction to handle edge cases
  3. Consistency - Fix the documentation heading level in github.mdx

🎯 Overall Assessment

This is a well-implemented feature that significantly improves user experience by providing direct access to provider-specific documentation. The code follows existing patterns and maintains consistency with the codebase. The only critical issue is the missing security attributes on the external link, which should be fixed before merging.

Recommendation: Approve after fixing the security concern


Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants