-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.7k
[bug] Remove double-formatted whitespace lines #9479
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
[bug] Remove double-formatted whitespace lines #9479
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @vincentzed, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request addresses a subtle but important formatting issue in Python f-strings. Specifically, it resolves cases where explicit backslash line continuations within f-strings were inadvertently introducing unwanted whitespace. The changes refactor these f-strings to leverage Python's implicit string literal concatenation, thereby ensuring correct string formatting and improving overall code readability without altering the logical behavior of the code.
Highlights
- Fixing f-string formatting: Corrected instances where f-strings using backslash \ for line continuation resulted in unexpected whitespace, ensuring accurate string output.
- Improved readability: Refactored long f-strings into multiple concatenated string literals, enhancing code clarity and adherence to Python's style guidelines.
- Consistency in error messages: Applied the formatting fix to assertion messages and error messages, ensuring consistent and correct output across the codebase.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request addresses issues with f-string formatting, specifically removing line continuations that introduce unwanted whitespace or cause syntax errors. The changes correctly use implicit string concatenation, which is a more robust approach. The fixes are solid, and I have one minor suggestion to further simplify one of the corrected strings.
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Motivation
It looks weird. some strings are continued to the next line because of the char
Modifications
EX:
To find run something like:
Accuracy Tests
Benchmarking and Profiling
Checklist