Skip to content

fix think template prepend nothink_prefix #5492

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 22, 2025
Merged

Conversation

hjh0119
Copy link
Collaborator

@hjh0119 hjh0119 commented Aug 22, 2025

PR type

  • Bug Fix
  • New Feature
  • Document Updates
  • More Models or Datasets Support

PR information

Write the detail information belongs to this PR.

Experiment results

Paste your experiment result here(if needed).

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @hjh0119, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a bug in the _swift_prepare_inputs function within the LLM template utility. The previous implementation might have incorrectly prepended a no_think_prefix to assistant messages even when the content already contained a <think> block or the no_think_prefix itself. The fix refines this logic, ensuring the prefix is only added when the message content does not already begin with either of these patterns, thereby preventing redundant or erroneous additions and improving the template's behavior during multi-turn SFT training/validation.

Highlights

  • Refined Prefix Prepending Logic: Modified the _swift_prepare_inputs function in swift/llm/template/template/utils.py to correctly handle the no_think_prefix. The condition for prepending the no_think_prefix to assistant messages now checks if the message content starts with either <think> or the no_think_prefix itself, preventing incorrect additions.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request addresses a bug in the ThinkingTemplate where no_think_prefix could be repeatedly prepended to an assistant's message. The fix correctly verifies if a message already starts with <think> or no_think_prefix before adding the prefix. While the logic is sound, the implementation could be slightly simplified for improved code clarity.

@hjh0119 hjh0119 merged commit 6d0bcfb into modelscope:main Aug 22, 2025
1 of 2 checks passed
@hjh0119 hjh0119 deleted the fix-think branch August 22, 2025 06:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants