Skip to content

support deepseek-V3.1 & add no_think_prefix for hybrid thinking models #5463

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Aug 21, 2025

Conversation

hjh0119
Copy link
Collaborator

@hjh0119 hjh0119 commented Aug 20, 2025

PR type

  • More Models or Datasets Support

disable_thinking(default)

swift infer \
    --model deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V3.1 \
    --response_prefix '</think>'

enable_thinking

swift infer \
    --model deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V3.1 \
    --response_prefix '<think>'

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @hjh0119, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces comprehensive support for the DeepSeek-V3.1 large language model, encompassing both its base and full versions. This enhancement expands the range of available models within the system, allowing users to leverage DeepSeek-V3.1 for various inference tasks and ensuring its seamless integration.

Highlights

  • New Model Type: A new model type deepseek_v3_1 has been added to categorize the new DeepSeek models, ensuring proper classification within the system.
  • Model Registration: Both DeepSeek-V3.1-Base and DeepSeek-V3.1 models are now registered, making them fully available for use within the application.
  • Documentation Update: The documentation, in both Chinese and English, has been updated to include the newly supported DeepSeek-V3.1 models, providing clear guidance for users.
  • New Test Case: A new test case has been implemented to verify the correct template encoding for DeepSeek-V3.1 models, ensuring their proper integration and functionality.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds support for the deepseek-V3.1 model, including updates to model constants, registration, templates, documentation, and a new test case. The implementation looks mostly correct, but I've identified two critical typos: one in the template registration and another in the test file. These issues need to be addressed to ensure the new model functions correctly.

@hjh0119 hjh0119 changed the title support deepseek-V3.1 support deepseek-V3.1 & add no_think_prefix for hybrid thinking models Aug 21, 2025
@hjh0119 hjh0119 merged commit 5334b84 into modelscope:main Aug 21, 2025
1 of 2 checks passed
@hjh0119 hjh0119 deleted the ds3.1 branch August 21, 2025 08:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants