Skip to content

Fix parameter typing and enhance documentation for some ops in data_juicer #755

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

cmgzn
Copy link
Collaborator

@cmgzn cmgzn commented Aug 7, 2025

Fixes parameter typing issues and standardizes parameter descriptions.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @cmgzn, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on improving the robustness and clarity of the data_juicer library by addressing parameter typing inconsistencies and significantly enhancing the quality and standardization of documentation across various operational modules. The changes aim to make the codebase easier to understand, maintain, and use for developers and future contributors.

Highlights

  • Type Hint Corrections: Updated several parameter type hints across various operations to accurately reflect their expected types, including adding Union for multiple types and Optional where parameters can be None. This improves code clarity and static analysis.
  • Documentation Enhancement and Standardization: Significantly improved and standardized docstrings for __init__ methods in numerous operations. This includes adding missing parameter descriptions, detailing complex nested arguments, and adopting a consistent :param format for better readability and auto-generation of documentation.
  • Docstring Typo Fixes: Corrected minor typos in parameter names within docstrings (e.g., mini_action_num to min_action_num) to ensure accuracy and consistency.
  • Documentation Simplification: Streamlined verbose or outdated documentation in some operations, making it more concise and relevant to the current implementation.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request focuses on improving code quality by fixing parameter typing and enhancing documentation across various operator files. The changes are well-executed and correctly address inconsistencies in type hints and missing or incorrect docstrings.

I've reviewed all the changes and found them to be solid improvements. I have one minor suggestion to improve the grammar in a docstring for better clarity. Overall, great work on enhancing the codebase's maintainability!

Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant