Skip to content

fix(930130): comment out false positive prone entries#4607

Merged
fzipi merged 1 commit into
coreruleset:mainfrom
EsadCetiner:fix-restricted-files-fp
Apr 18, 2026
Merged

fix(930130): comment out false positive prone entries#4607
fzipi merged 1 commit into
coreruleset:mainfrom
EsadCetiner:fix-restricted-files-fp

Conversation

@EsadCetiner

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Proposed changes

This PR fixes some new false positives recently introduced by PR #4536 based on my own testing in production that mostly affect the loading of static files.

PR Checklist

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING doc
  • I have added positive tests proving my fix/feature works as intended.
  • I have added negative tests that prove my fix/feature considers common cases that might end in false positives
  • In case you changed a regular expression, you are not adding a ReDOS for pcre. You can check this using regexploit
  • My test use the comment field to write the expected behavior
  • I have added documentation for the rule or change (when appropriate)

Further comments

For the reviewer

  • Positive and negative tests were added
  • Tests cover the intended fix/feature properly
  • No usage of dangerous constructs like ctl:requestBodyAccess=Off were used in the rule
  • In case a regular expression was changed, there is no ReDOS
  • Documentation is clear for the rule/change

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Apr 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Quantitative test results for language: eng, year: 2023, size: 10K, paranoia level: 1:
🚀 Quantitative testing did not detect new false positives

@HackingRepo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

So @EsadCetiner, just those entries, others not

@EsadCetiner

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@HackingRepo Based on my testing

@HackingRepo

HackingRepo commented Apr 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

maybe, actually reduced

@fzipi

fzipi commented Apr 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Do we need to backport this one also?

@EsadCetiner

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@fzipi No, these false positives aren't part of the LTS.

@HackingRepo

HackingRepo commented Apr 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

since the feature/pr itself not on LTS because is too big, so no need backporting for that FP, since LTS not affected

@fzipi
fzipi force-pushed the fix-restricted-files-fp branch from 31444ee to 72c4cf0 Compare April 18, 2026 13:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants