Skip to content

fix: Update commit-check.yml #131

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

fix: Update commit-check.yml #131

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

shenxianpeng
Copy link
Contributor

@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng commented Aug 19, 2025 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the commit-message check in CI to use a pinned external GitHub Action instead of a local action reference.
    • Preserved all existing workflow configuration, environment settings, triggers, permissions and runner selection.
    • No changes to public APIs or user-facing features.

@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng requested a review from a team as a code owner August 19, 2025 19:29
@coderabbitai coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 19, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

Replaced the local action reference in the commit-check GitHub Actions workflow with a pinned external action 9df7725; all workflow triggers, permissions, runner, env, and step parameters remain unchanged.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change summary
CI workflow
.github/workflows/commit-check.yml		 Switched action source from local ./ to pinned commit-check/commit-check-action@9df7725c1bb0c910c1c1ea8da0afca1d08934177; retained env and with: parameters (message, branch, author-name, author-email, commit-signoff, merge-base, imperative, job-summary, pr-comments), triggers, permissions, and runner.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Suggested labels

bug

Poem

I hopped to the workflow, quick and light,
Swapped a local path for a pinned delight.
Same steps, same checks, a tidy new tune,
Carrots lined up beneath the CI moon. 🥕🐇

Tip

🔌 Remote MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration is now available!

Pro plan users can now connect to remote MCP servers from the Integrations page. Connect with popular remote MCPs such as Notion and Linear to add more context to your reviews and chats.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

💡 Knowledge Base configuration:

  • MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4af6a61 and 7610b1e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/commit-check.yml (1 hunks)
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)

Type @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Status, Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Status Page to check the current availability of CodeRabbit.
  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot reviewed Aug 19, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

💡 Knowledge Base configuration:

  • MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1a0695b and 4af6a61.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/commit-check.yml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/workflows/commit-check.yml (3)

11-14: Forked-PR caveat: PR comments may not post for forks with pull_request event

With on: pull_request and GITHUB_TOKEN, workflows triggered from forks typically don’t have write permissions to post PR comments. Your pull-requests: write permission here will be downgraded on forked PRs, so pr-comments may silently fail.

  • If you expect external/fork contributions and want comments, consider a hardened pull_request_target setup, or handle comments via a bot/app.
  • Otherwise, if this repo is internal-only, current permissions are fine.

Would you like a hardened pull_request_target variant drafted (with safe checkout and least-privilege guidance)?

15-18: Checkout strategy looks correct for commit analysis

Using actions/checkout@v5 with the PR head SHA and fetch-depth: 0 is appropriate for computing merge bases and inspecting commit history.

23-31: Inputs are well-scoped; conditional PR comments is a nice touch

Enabling/disabling PR comments based on the event type keeps local/manual runs clean while preserving PR feedback.

@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng deleted the shenxianpeng-patch-1 branch August 19, 2025 20:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@coderabbitai coderabbitai[bot] coderabbitai[bot] left review comments

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@shenxianpeng