Skip to content

Removed $sequence from response through response filters #10115

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 18, 2025
Merged

Conversation

ArnabChatterjee20k
Copy link
Contributor

What does this PR do?

(Provide a description of what this PR does and why it's needed.)

Test Plan

(Write your test plan here. If you changed any code, please provide us with clear instructions on how you verified your changes work. Screenshots may also be helpful.)

Related PRs and Issues

  • (Related PR or issue)

Checklist

  • Have you read the Contributing Guidelines on issues?
  • If the PR includes a change to an API's metadata (desc, label, params, etc.), does it also include updated API specs and example docs?

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 7, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This change introduces a new response filter version (V20) to the application's response handling logic. The V20 filter is implemented as a new class extending the existing filter base class. It processes response content by removing the $sequence field from document and document list models. The main controller is updated to apply this filter when the requested response format version is less than 1.8.0, alongside existing filters for earlier versions. No modifications are made to public APIs or exported entity signatures.

Possibly related PRs

  • Feat expose sequence #9870: Introduces the $sequence field to the Document model and modifies document filtering to retain $sequence, which contrasts with the V20 filter's removal of this field.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a2b6ed3 and 16c3f2c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • app/controllers/general.php (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • app/controllers/general.php
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: scan
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/Appwrite/Utopia/Response/Filters/V20.php (1)

8-11: Consider clarifying the comment.

The comment mentions "removing $sequence from all versions less than 1.8" but the version filtering is actually handled in the controller, not within this filter class itself. This filter simply removes the $sequence field when applied.

Consider updating the comment to be more precise:

-    // removing $sequence from all versions less than 1.8
+    // Removes $sequence field from document responses
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b2fa287 and a2b6ed3.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • app/controllers/general.php (2 hunks)
  • src/Appwrite/Utopia/Response/Filters/V20.php (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: abnegate
PR: appwrite/appwrite#9743
File: src/Appwrite/Utopia/Request.php:33-36
Timestamp: 2025-05-12T06:05:27.133Z
Learning: In Appwrite's architecture, the Request class should only filter parameters when filters are explicitly registered. If no filters are present, all parameters should be passed through, and the route action is responsible for validating which parameters are present/valid.
Learnt from: ItzNotABug
PR: appwrite/appwrite#9669
File: src/Appwrite/Utopia/Request/Filters/V19.php:56-71
Timestamp: 2025-05-03T05:58:34.294Z
Learning: According to the developer, wildcard select handling in V19 request filter is only needed for `listDocuments` operations, not for `getDocument` operations, despite the doc-block mentioning both.
src/Appwrite/Utopia/Response/Filters/V20.php (1)
Learnt from: ItzNotABug
PR: appwrite/appwrite#9669
File: src/Appwrite/Utopia/Request/Filters/V19.php:56-71
Timestamp: 2025-05-03T05:58:34.294Z
Learning: According to the developer, wildcard select handling in V19 request filter is only needed for `listDocuments` operations, not for `getDocument` operations, despite the doc-block mentioning both.
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
src/Appwrite/Utopia/Response/Filters/V20.php (2)
src/Appwrite/Utopia/Response.php (1)
  • Response (151-963)
src/Appwrite/Utopia/Request/Filter.php (2)
  • Filter (5-16)
  • parse (15-15)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)
  • GitHub Check: Linter
  • GitHub Check: Setup & Build Appwrite Image
  • GitHub Check: Setup & Build Appwrite Image
  • GitHub Check: scan
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/Appwrite/Utopia/Response/Filters/V20.php (2)

11-22: LGTM! Clean implementation using modern PHP syntax.

The match expression appropriately handles the different model types, with proper delegation to parseDocument for individual documents and handleList for document collections. The default case ensures other models pass through unchanged.


24-28: LGTM! Safe and straightforward implementation.

The unset() operation safely removes the $sequence field without causing errors if the key doesn't exist. The method is focused and does exactly what's needed.

app/controllers/general.php (2)

30-30: LGTM! Import follows established conventions.

The import statement is correctly positioned with other response filter imports and follows the consistent naming pattern.


1016-1018: LGTM! Version filtering correctly implemented.

The version check follows the established pattern and correctly applies the V20 filter for API versions less than 1.8.0. This ensures backward compatibility by removing the $sequence field from responses for older clients.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 7, 2025

Security Scan Results for PR

Docker Image Scan Results

Package Version Vulnerability Severity
binutils 2.42-r0 CVE-2025-0840 HIGH
git 2.45.3-r0 CVE-2025-48384 HIGH
git 2.45.3-r0 CVE-2025-48385 HIGH
git-init-template 2.45.3-r0 CVE-2025-48384 HIGH
git-init-template 2.45.3-r0 CVE-2025-48385 HIGH
icu 74.2-r0 CVE-2025-5222 HIGH
icu-data-en 74.2-r0 CVE-2025-5222 HIGH
icu-dev 74.2-r0 CVE-2025-5222 HIGH
icu-libs 74.2-r0 CVE-2025-5222 HIGH
libexpat 2.6.4-r0 CVE-2024-8176 HIGH
libxml2 2.12.7-r0 CVE-2024-56171 HIGH
libxml2 2.12.7-r0 CVE-2025-24928 HIGH
libxml2 2.12.7-r0 CVE-2025-27113 HIGH
libxml2 2.12.7-r0 CVE-2025-32414 HIGH
libxml2 2.12.7-r0 CVE-2025-32415 HIGH
pyc 3.12.9-r0 CVE-2024-12718 HIGH
pyc 3.12.9-r0 CVE-2025-4138 HIGH
pyc 3.12.9-r0 CVE-2025-4330 HIGH
pyc 3.12.9-r0 CVE-2025-4517 HIGH
python3 3.12.9-r0 CVE-2024-12718 HIGH
python3 3.12.9-r0 CVE-2025-4138 HIGH
python3 3.12.9-r0 CVE-2025-4330 HIGH
python3 3.12.9-r0 CVE-2025-4517 HIGH
python3-pyc 3.12.9-r0 CVE-2024-12718 HIGH
python3-pyc 3.12.9-r0 CVE-2025-4138 HIGH
python3-pyc 3.12.9-r0 CVE-2025-4330 HIGH
python3-pyc 3.12.9-r0 CVE-2025-4517 HIGH
python3-pycache-pyc0 3.12.9-r0 CVE-2024-12718 HIGH
python3-pycache-pyc0 3.12.9-r0 CVE-2025-4138 HIGH
python3-pycache-pyc0 3.12.9-r0 CVE-2025-4330 HIGH
python3-pycache-pyc0 3.12.9-r0 CVE-2025-4517 HIGH
sqlite-libs 3.45.3-r1 CVE-2025-29087 HIGH
xz 5.6.2-r0 CVE-2025-31115 HIGH
xz-libs 5.6.2-r0 CVE-2025-31115 HIGH
golang.org/x/crypto v0.31.0 CVE-2025-22869 HIGH

Source Code Scan Results

🎉 No vulnerabilities found!

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 7, 2025

✨ Benchmark results

  • Requests per second: 884
  • Requests with 200 status code: 159,110
  • P99 latency: 0.215485455

⚡ Benchmark Comparison

Metric This PR Latest version
RPS 884 1,153
200 159,110 207,592
P99 0.215485455 0.163003432

@abnegate abnegate merged commit 0a3d206 into 1.8.x Jul 18, 2025
39 checks passed
@abnegate abnegate deleted the dat-571 branch July 18, 2025 05:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants