Skip to content

Blockproducer Explorer feature including Transaction type encode/decode improvements #90

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 38 commits into from
Oct 23, 2018

Conversation

xq262144
Copy link
Contributor

  1. Blockproducer Explorer server api.
  2. Refactor blockproducer Transaction interface decode/encode.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 18, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #90 into develop will increase coverage by 0.53%.
The diff coverage is 55.92%.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop      #90      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    76.15%   76.69%   +0.53%     
===========================================
  Files          147      147              
  Lines        11783    11498     -285     
===========================================
- Hits          8973     8818     -155     
+ Misses        1837     1751      -86     
+ Partials       973      929      -44

Qi Xiao and others added 27 commits October 19, 2018 16:53
@xq262144 xq262144 changed the title [WIP] Blockproducer Explorer feature including Transaction type encode/decode improvements Blockproducer Explorer feature including Transaction type encode/decode improvements Oct 23, 2018
Copy link
Contributor

@zeqing-guo zeqing-guo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@zeqing-guo zeqing-guo merged commit 063d898 into develop Oct 23, 2018
@leventeliu leventeliu deleted the feature/explorer branch November 1, 2018 03:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants