Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Dominus Litis Restorative Model: Reconstruction of the Role of the Prosecutor in Criminal Procedure Law Against Perpetrators with Mental and/or Intellectual Disabilities Dera, Alfa; Hasibuan, Fauzie Yusuf; Kristiawanto , Kristiawanto
Advances In Social Humanities Research Vol. 3 No. 7 (2025): Advances In Social Humanities Research
Publisher : Sahabat Publikasi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/adv.v3i7.463

Abstract

This study aims to examine and formulate a restorative justice-based concept to strengthen the role of prosecutors as dominus litis in criminal procedure law concerning offenders with mental and/or intellectual disabilities (PMID). Despite Indonesia’s ratification of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), the current criminal procedure system remains formalistic and fails to provide equitable legal protection for vulnerable groups. Using a normative juridical method combined with doctrinal and comparative approaches, this study analyzes relevant laws, practices, and empirical data. Findings reveal that prosecutors currently act merely as procedural agents for court referral, with no legal discretion to divert or dismiss cases restoratively. The absence of judicial-health assessments and lack of interdisciplinary collaboration result in discriminatory prosecution of mentally disabled offenders. This research proposes a restorative dominus litis model, integrating prosecutorial discretion, forensic mental health assessments, and legal mechanisms for restorative case resolution. The model supports the reform of Indonesia’s criminal procedure law toward a more inclusive, humane, and rights-based justice system.
Reconstruction Of The Authority To Seize Evidence By Military Police Investigators In Corruption Crimes To Realize Legal Certainty Tambunan, Anton Maruli; Latif, Abdul; Kristiawanto , Kristiawanto
Advances In Social Humanities Research Vol. 3 No. 7 (2025): Advances In Social Humanities Research
Publisher : Sahabat Publikasi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/adv.v3i7.464

Abstract

Seizure of evidence is one of the key instruments in the law enforcement process, including in corruption crimes involving members of the military. However, the authority of Military Police (PM) investigators in conducting seizures still faces various normative and procedural obstacles. This research aims to analyze the legal construction governing this authority and offer an ideal reconstruction model to ensure legal certainty. By using normative juridical methods and a multidimensional approach - namely legislative, historical, comparative, and conceptual approaches - this research reveals the existence of inconsistencies between the Military Justice Law, the KPK Law, and the Corruption Crime Law, which have implications for the uncertainty of the authority of PM investigators in corruption cases, especially in the context of military-civilian connectivity. This research offers a legal reconstruction that includes regulatory harmonization, the formation of a cross-agency connectivity team, standardized confiscation SOPs, and strengthening the supervision of the military court. The novelty of this research lies in the focus of specific studies on confiscation by PM investigators in corruption crimes and the development of applicable operational legal models. The contribution is significant for the development of military criminal law and law enforcement system reform within the TNI.