Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Jurnal Litigasi Amsir
Dedi Dedi
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tomakaka
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindakan Main Hakim Sendiri: Studi Polres Majene Muhammad Al Habsy Ahmad; Dedi Dedi; Hadriana Hadriana
Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Vol. 2 No. 2 (2020): Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law
Publisher : ILIN Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31960/ijocl.v2i2.533

Abstract

Penelitian betujuan untuk menganalisi Faktor Penyebab Tindakan Main Hakim Sendiri Yang Terjadi Di Wilayah Polres Majene Upaya Yang Dilakukan Oleh Pihak Kepolisian Dalam Menangani Perkara Tindakan Main Hakim Sendiri Yang Terjadi Di Masyarakat. Metode Penelitian menggunakan penelitian hukum empiris yang berlokasi di wilayah hukum polres Majene. Hasil Penelitian bahwa Tindakan main hakim sendiri (Eigenrichting) ini kemudian dalam tatanan hukum nasional bertentangan dengan asas praduga tidak bersala (presumption of innocence). Jadi seseorang tidak boleh dihukumi bersalah atau tidaknya tanpa melalui suatu proses hukum, sebab ada kemungkinan seseorang tidak bersalah tetapi menjadi korban tindakan main hakim sendiri. Upaya yang dilakukan untuk penegakan hukum tindakan main sendiri oleh kepolisian adalah dengan upaya represif, upaya preventif dan upaya pre-emtif. The The purpose of this study is to analyze the Factors That Cause Acting Against the Judges Who Happened at the Majene Regional Police Station conducted by the Police in Handling Cases of Self-Defense Actions that Happen in the Community. The research method uses empirical legal research located in Majene Regional Police Station. The results of the study that the act of vigilante (Eigenrichting) later in the national legal order is contrary to the principle of presumption of innocence. So a person must not be punished or not without going through legal proceedings, because there is a possibility that someone is innocent but becomes a victim of vigilante justice. The efforts made for the law enforcement action alone by the police are repressive, preventive and pre-emptive.
Kajian Yuridis Pelaksanaan Sidang Elektronik di Masa Pandemic Covid-19 Ditinjau dari Perspektif Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Dedi Dedi; Muhammad Al Habsy Ahmad
Jurnal Litigasi Amsir Vol 11 No 1 (2023): November
Publisher : Faculty of Law Andi Sapada Institute of Social Sciences and Business

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research aims to determine the mechanism of trials carried out using an electronic system based on what is regulated in Supreme Court Regulation Number. 4 of 2020 concerning Administration and Electronic Criminal Trials and determine the fulfillment of the defendant's rights in trials conducted electronically. This research uses normative research methods, which is research in the form of research on legal materials in the form of specific legislation or written laws. An electronic trial is a series of processes of examining, adjudicating, and deciding a defendant's case by a court which is carried out with the support of information and communication technology, audiovisual and other electronic means as stated in Article 1 point 12 of Supreme Court Regulation Number 4 of 2020 concerning Administration and Trial of Criminal Cases in Court Electronically. In practice, electronic trials are the same as face-to-face trials which were previously often held, the difference being that the defendant did not take part in the trial in the courtroom, but rather the defendant took part in the problem via video teleconference call in the detention center where the defendant was detained. With the implementation of the electronic trial system, the defendant's rights are reduced in the electronic trial process which were previously regulated and guaranteed in the Criminal Code (KUHAP).
Co-Authors Damayanti, Elok Muhammad Al Habsy Ahmad