Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Regulating Halal Products in Indonesia: Between Religious Needs and Socio-Economic Challenges Susetyo, Heru; Prihatini, Farida; Karimah, Iffah; Ghozi, Ahmad
Mazahib VOLUME 18, ISSUE 1, JUNE 2019
Publisher : IAIN Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1129.369 KB) | DOI: 10.21093/mj.v18i1.1372

Abstract

As the most populous Muslim country in the world, Indonesia needs to spend seven decades until finally enacted the Halal Product Assurance Law in 2014.  There are mixed responses in welcoming this law.  Many Muslims are incredibly pleased with this law, while others believe that this law would create social and economic problems, instead. Four years have lapsed and the law is still difficult to be implemented, since the state has produced none of the implementing regulations of the said law.  Meanwhile, the National Agency for Halal Product Assurance is newly established in 2018.  Therefore, the law on halal product assurance is really at stake.  It seems that the state enacted it half-heartedly. This paper discusses the dynamic of regulating halal products in Indonesia, between spiritual needs and socio-economic challenges. Less Muslim argued that halal is not part of Islamic teaching, yet many people believe that halal product in Indonesia is not merely a religious issue but also a social, economic and even political issue.  The methods for this research are both normative and qualitative. Data are collected mainly through documents, library materials, and field research. To sharpen the findings, comparative studies with Malaysia and Thailand were conducted. In the end, this research reveals the socio-economic dynamics of halal product regulation in Indonesia amid which is beyond religious issues.Keywords:  halal product, Indonesia, regulation.
CHALLENGES AND POTENTIALS OF WAQF IN CONTEMPORARY INDONESIA HASANAH, USWATUN; SUSETYO, HERU
UNTAG Law Review Vol 4, No 1 (2020): UNTAG LAW REVIEW (ULREV)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (537.136 KB) | DOI: 10.36356/ulrev.v4i1.1520

Abstract

Waqf, as an instrument of the Islamic Economy, has been developed in a quite long period. Since the Prophet Muhammad PBUH era up to present. Indonesian people have also recognized waqf much long before Indonesian independence in 1945. Yet, the institutionalization of waqf into national law is less than five decades in Indonesia. As the most predominantly Muslim country in the world, most of the people recognize waqf only as a land donated in the name of Allah for building masjids, schools (madrasah) or cemeteries. Whereas, at The Law No. 41/ 2004 on Waqf, waqf is not limited to immovable goods but also movable assets. And, the utilization of waqf is not limited to build masjids and madrasah, but also for other purposes that related to public welfare. This article discusses the challenges and potentials of waqf in contemporary Indonesia
Implementation of Sharia Compliance to Optimize Zakat Governance in the Frontier and Outermost Regions in Indonesia Kaffah, Nurfahmi Islami; Susetyo, Heru
Pandecta Research Law Journal Vol 15, No 2 (2020): December
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/pandecta.v15i2.24162

Abstract

This research is a juridical and empirical study about the implementation of sharia compliance based on Law no. 23 the year 2011 on the Management of Zakat. BAZNAS, as the zakat management authority under the government, must implement good governance based on Islamic Sharia principles, trustworthiness, benefit, justice, legal certainty, integrated and accountability as a mandate from the zakat regulation. Sharia compliance is the main aspect in the management of zakat which consists the rules and the principles of sharia are essentially listed in the Qur’an, Hadith and developed in zakat fiqh related to principles of collecting and management of zakat, such as subject dan object of zakat, nisab and haul and the utilization and empowerment of zakat property. This study discusses the regulatory aspects of sharia compliance in the management of zakat, sharia principle in the operation of zakat, the stakeholders, indicators, reporting and auditing systems, and the benefits of implementing sharia compliance in zakat management. The research field was conducted in six ProvinceS in Indonesia (Aceh, West Nusa Tenggara, East Kalimantan Province, East Nusa Tenggara, North Sulawesi, Gorontalo). The implementation of sharia compliance in zakat institutions began to be effective in 2018 after the Decree of the Ministry of Religious Affairs Number 733 in 2018 concerning sharia audit guidelines for zakat management reports. The implementation of sharia compliance has a positive correlation with the implementation of good governance in the management of zakat institutions because it is associated with increased accountability and responsibility of zakat institutions. Sharia compliance is a strategic issue in achieving best practices in the management of zakat institutions, especially in ensuring legal certainty and trust in the community to optimize the empowerment of zakat in Indonesia.
Human Rights Regime: Between Universality and Cultural Relativism, An Indonesian Experience Susetyo, Heru
Indonesian Journal of International Law
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (365.891 KB)

Abstract

Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948 come with the idea that human rights are all universal. Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action 1993 strengthen the universalism of human rights by claiming that and interdependent and interrelated. The international community must treat human rights globally in a fair and equal manner, on the same footing, and with the same emphasis. While the significance of national and regional particularities and various historical, cultural and religious backgrounds must be borne in mind, it is the duty of States, regardless of their political, economic and cultural systems, to promote and protect all human rights and fundamental freedoms. And here is the problem. Indonesia is a member of the United Nations. Indonesia adopted UDHR 1948 and made it as the primary source of National Human Rights Provision (Law No. 39/ 1949). However, in practice, there are a lot of challenges in implementing universal human rights in Indonesia. Cultural relativism exists. This paper, therefore, will explore the complexity of Human Rights regime in Indonesia among various cultural relativism surrounding it by using legal and normative approach. The research found that international human rights law in Indonesia can not be implemented in the same manner as applied in the Western world. Instead, it needs to consider local and regional values, as well.
Kebijakan Penanganan Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) di Indonesia dan Dunia Internasional Susetyo, Heru
Indonesian Journal of International Law
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1905.621 KB)

Abstract

In Indonesia, the concept of Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) has not obvious enough and become the basis of thought yet. It can be seen from the regulation that regulate the IDPs which none of those regulations uses IDPs terminology. Another provides evidence is no regulation in act level regarding IDPs. The best regulation regarding IDPs in Indonesia is Presidential Decree Number 3 year 2001. The consequence of this condition, IDPs problems could not handle properly. Contrary condition with International, there are several instruments can be apply to resolve the IDPs problem such as the 1951 Refugee Convention, the 1949 Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, The Second Additional Protocol 1977. The protection of victims of non-international armed conflicts, and The Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement (Guiding Principles). International bodies dealing with IDPs, like UNHCR could not directly access IDPs in Indonesia because of state sovereignty. This article is trying to provide the big picture of IDPs condition and the policy in Indonesia relating to the international law.
Kajian Kasus-kontrol Avian Influenza Pada Unggas di Jawa Timur, Jawa Tengah dan Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta= A Case-control Study on Avian Influenza in Poultry in East Java, Central Java and Yogyakarta Special Province. Dyah Ayu Widiasih; Heru Susetyo; Bambang Sumiarto; Charles Rangga Tabbu; Setyawan Budiharta
Jurnal Sain Veteriner Vol 24, No 1 (2006): JUNI
Publisher : Fakultas Kedokteran Hewan Universitas Gadjah Mada bekerjasama dengan PB PDHI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1791.726 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jsv.341

Abstract

Kajian kasus-kontrol yang dirancang untuk menyidik kejadian avian influenza (Al) dan mencari hubungannya dengan faktor resiko penyakit, telah dilakukan terhadap 218 dusun di Jawa Timur, Jawa Tengah dan Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Sebagai kasus (109 dusun) adalah dusun yang pernah dilaporkan atau sedang mengalami kasus AI, dan kontrol (109 dusun), adalah dusun yang dilaporkan belum pernah mengalami, tetapi dekat dengan dusun kasus. Kuesioner digunakan untuk menjaring variabel yang diperkirakan berasosiasi dengan kejadian AI. Data yang diperoleh dianalisis dengan Chi Square (x2) dan odds ratio (OR). Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa faktor adanya hewan pengerat (OR = 1,90), faktor adanya burung liar (OR = 24,00), faktor pekerja pulang sehabis kerja (OR = 2,65), dan faktor sektor III (OR = 1,79) mempunyai asosiasi karat dengan kejadian AI di suatu dusun, sedangkan beberapa faktor biosekuriti berasosiasi lemah (OR = 1,0 – 1,5) terhadap kejadian Al.
PERAN DAN TANGGUNG JAWAB NOTARIS DALAM MERGER, AKUISISI DAN KONSOLIDASI PERUSAHAAN Muhamad Syarief Nurhidayat; Heru Susetyo
Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol 10 No 4 (2022)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (409.534 KB) | DOI: 10.24843/KS.2022.v10.i04.p17

Abstract

Pelaksanaan merger, akuisisi dan konsolidasi di Indonesia harus dituangkan dalam akta Notaris. Notaris ikut berperan serta dalam proses pelaksanaan merger, akuisisi dan konsolidasi. Dalam penelitian ini akan dilihat bagaimana peran Notaris dalam pelaksanaan merger, akuisisi dan konsolidasi yang dilakukan perusahaan ditinjau dari bagaimana tanggung jawab Notaris dalam pembuatan akta merger, akuisisi dan konsolidasi yang dilakukan perusahaan. Notaris memiliki peranan yang sangat penting dalam mempersiapkan perusahaan melakukan merger, akuisisi dan konsolidasi. Notaris diberikan kewenangan oleh Negara dalam mempersiapkan akta-akta yang berkaitan dengan tindakan perusahaan tersebut. Kedudukan Notaris sangat penting oleh sebab itu penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui peranan Notaris dalam kegiatan perusahaan seperti Merger, Akuisisi dan Konsolidasi. sebagai Pejabat Umum Notaris dapat membuat Akta Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham dimana Akta tersebut menyetujui tindakan Hukum Merger, Akuisisi serta Konsolidasi. Notaris sebagai Pejabat Umum diberikan kewenangan secara atributif untuk melakukan kegiatan pengurusan yang terkait dengan Pengesahan badan hukum perseroan terkait dengan Peleburan, persetujuan perubahan anggaran dasar, penyampaian pemberitahuan perubahan Anggaran Dasar atau Data untuk Merger/Akuisisi ke Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia. Dalam hal melaksanakan kegiatan di bidang Pasar Modal Notaris tunduk kepada Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (POJK). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memberikan gambaran dan informasi kepada masyarakat mengenai peran notaris dalam pengurusan merger, akuisisi, dan konsolidasi dan memberikan gambaran mengenai tanggung jawab notaris dalam membuat akta dan dalam merger, akuisisi, dan konsolidasi. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian yuridis normatif. Notaris adalah pejabat umum yang diberikan kewenangan untuk membuat akta autentik yang berkaitan dengan tindakan korporasi, notaris juga berperan dalam pendaftaran merger, akuisisi, dan konsolidasi untuk mendapatkan pengesahan kepada Kemenkumham. In Indonesia, the implementation of mergers, acquisitions and consolidations must be stated in a notarial deed. Notaries participate in the process of implementing mergers, acquisitions and consolidations. In this study, it will be seen how the role of the notary in the implementation of mergers, acquisitions and consolidations carried out by the company in terms of how the notary's responsibilities in making the deed of mergers, acquisitions and consolidations carried out by the company. Notaries have a very important role in preparing companies for mergers, acquisitions and consolidations. Notaries are given the authority by the State to prepare deeds relating to the company's actions. The position of a notary is very important, therefore this study aims to determine the role of a notary in company activities such as mergers, acquisitions and consolidations. as a Notary General Officer can make a Deed of the General Meeting of Shareholders in which the Deed approves the legal actions of Mergers, Acquisitions and Consolidations. Notaries as General Officials are given attributive authority to carry out management activities related to the Ratification of corporate legal entities related to the Consolidation, approval of amendments to the articles of association, submission of notification of changes to the Articles of Association or Data for Mergers/Acquisitions to the Ministry of Law and Human Rights. In carrying out activities in the Capital Market, a Notary is subject to the Regulations of the Financial Services Authority (POJK). This study aims to provide an overview and information to the public regarding the role of notaries in managing mergers, acquisitions, and consolidations and to provide an overview of the responsibilities of the nptaries in making deeds and in mergers, acquisitions, and consolidations. The research method used in this research is normative juridical research. Notaries are public officials who are given the authority to make authentic deeds related to corporate actions, notaries also play a role in registering mergers, acquisitions, and consolidations to obtain approval from the Ministry of Law and Human Rights.
Terrorism as Socially Constructed Crime in Indonesia Heru Susetyo
PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 6, No 2 (2019): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (370.992 KB)

Abstract

AbstractIn the aftermath of Bali Bombing 2002, which is considered the biggest terrorist attack in Indonesia, the Indonesian government launched the so-called ‘war against terrorism’. Subsequently, the government established and applied laws on terrorism and formed a special counter-terrorism police squad: The Detachment 88. A state body that coordinates counter-terrorism measures is quickly established, the National Anti-Terrorism Agency (BNPT –Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Terorisme). Therefore, terrorism in Indonesia has been considered a ‘big and serious business’ since 2002. It also raises a serious question in defining and judging terror crime. Indeed, Indonesia has the law of terrorism since 2002, yet the definition is not very clear. Even in international forum, there is no single and approved definition of terrorism. For instance, an armed group who attacked civilians in Central Sulawesi was named terrorists by the state. On the other hand, a group of militias who attacked and held hostages in Timika, Papua was labelled as an armed criminal group. In Jakarta, there were some bomb threats during 2015 and 2017. Nevertheless, the law enforcement agencies have never named them as ‘terrorists’, although their actions deserve to be called as ‘lone-wolf terrorism’. This paper aims to identify the social construction of terrorism. Terrorism is a term that is used regularly by news media and politicians. Whether its application is impartial or biased is fundamental to a debate. In a society where, international terrorism monopolizes news media and political discussion, there is no greater need than to analyze the boundaries of the term ‘terrorism’ construction within social processes. One of the serious problems involving terrorism in Indonesia is to define an offense as terrorism. The laws of terrorism are existed. The judgment and conviction to terrorism suspects also have been made in various jurisdictions. Yet, the types of offenses constituted as terrorism are still unclear. Ordinary people, media, opinion makers, and law enforcement officers have socially constructed terrorism and have their own perceptions of terrorism. This condition leads to law uncertainty and, to some extent, it leads to victimization and stigmatization of innocent people because their appearances and social environments have been associated to terrorism. This study employed two approaches: Social construction and guilt by association theories.Terorisme sebagai Kejahatan yang Dibangun secara Sosial di IndonesiaAbstrakSetelah Bom Bali 12 Oktober 2002, yang dianggap sebagai serangan teroris terbesar di Indonesia, pemerintah Indonesia meluncurkan apa yang disebut ‘perang melawan terorisme’. Undang-undang tentang terorisme segera diberlakukan dan diterapkan secara surut. Polisi Khusus untuk Memerangi Terorisme, yaitu Detasemen 88, dibentuk. Badan khusus untuk mengoordinasikan langkah-langkah anti-terorisme dengan cepat dibentuk, yaitu Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Terorisme atau Badan Anti-Terorisme Nasional. Oleh karena itu, terorisme di Indonesia telah menjadi ‘permasalahan yang besar dan serius’ sejak tahun 2002. Hal ini pun menimbulkan pertanyaan serius, bagaimana mendefinisikan dan menganggap kejahatan sebagai terorisme? Indonesia memang telah memberlakukan undang-undang tentang terorisme sejak tahun 2002, namun definisi ini tidak begitu jelas. Dan bahkan di forum internasional, tidak ada definisi tunggal, dan satu pihak  setuju untuk mengartikan terorisme. Misalnya, sebuah kelompok bersenjata yang menyerang warga sipil di Sulawesi Tengah disebut sebagai teroris oleh negara, sementara kelompok militan yang menyerang dan menahan warga sipil yang disandera di Timika, Pulau Papua dicap sebagai kelompok kriminal bersenjata oleh negara. Di Jakarta Metropolitan, ada beberapa ancaman bom yang dibuat oleh individu pada tahun 2015 dan 2017. Namun demikian, lembaga penegak hukum tidak pernah menyebut mereka sebagai ‘teroris’, meskipun tindakan mereka pantas disebut sebagai ‘terorisme serigala sendirian’. Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi sejauh mana terorisme telah dibangun secara sosial. Terorisme adalah istilah yang digunakan secara teratur oleh media berita dan politisi, dan apakah penerapannya tidak berpihak merupakan hal mendasar dalam perdebatan. Dalam masyarakat di mana terorisme internasional memonopoli media berita dan diskusi politik, tidak ada kebutuhan yang lebih besar selain menganalisis sejauh mana istilah ‘terorisme’ dibangun melalui proses sosial. Salah satu masalah serius yang melibatkan terorisme di Indonesia adalah tentang bagaimana mendefinisikan pelanggaran sebagai terorisme. Undang-undang tentang terorisme ada di sana, keputusan dan hukuman terhadap tersangka terorisme juga telah dibuat di berbagai yurisdiksi, namun, yang merupakan pelanggaran terorisme, masih belum jelas. Masyarakat biasa, media, pembuat opini dan aparat penegak hukum telah secara sosial membangun terorisme dan memiliki persepsi mereka tentang terorisme. Kondisi-kondisi ini kemudian mengarah pada ketidakpastian hukum, dan sampai batas tertentu, viktimisasi dan stigmatisasi kepada orang yang tidak bersalah, semata-mata karena penampilan dan lingkungan sosial mereka telah dikaitkan dengan terorisme. Makalah ini menggunakan dua pendekatan, yaitu konstruksi sosial dan sasa bersalah oleh teori asosiasi.DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v6n2.a4
PERKAWINAN SESAMA JENIS DAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA: PENERAPAN PRINSIP EQUALITY DALAM PUTUSAN OBERGEFELL, et.al. v. HODGES, USA SERTA ANALISIS MENGENAI PERKAWINAN SESAMA JENIS DI INDONESIA Holy K.M. Kalangit; Heru Susetyo
University Of Bengkulu Law Journal Vol 5, No 2 (2020): OCTOBER
Publisher : Universitas Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/ubelaj.5.2.177-200

Abstract

AbstractThe ‘rights’ and ‘equality’ arguments have been widely used in the last couple of years by the same-sex marriage supporters in claiming the legalization of same-sex marriage. The principle of equality in same-sex marriage legalization claims is closely related with the concept of human rights on the ground that the principle of equality is considered as one of the most important principles in the said concept. The decision of the Supreme Court of the United States of America in Obergefell et al. v. Hodges, Director, Ohio Department of Health is the latest decision concerning the legalization of same-sex marriage that changes radically the legality of same-sex marriage in the United States and may affect other nations. This research analyzes the said Decision, specifically on the application of the principle of equality. This research also analyzes the same-sex marriage issue in Indonesia from the perspective of universality and cultural relativism of human rights. The conclusion of this research is that the principle of equality in the Decision of the Supreme Court of the United States of America was not correctly applied and therefore it cannot be used in the same-sex marriage claims. And in Indonesia, it can be concluded that from the perspective of universality and cultural relativism of human rights, same-sex marriage cannot be legalized.Keywords: human, rights, same-sex, marriage, equality, universality, cultural, relativism.
KEDUDUKAN HAK ATAS TANAH DI INDONESIA AKIBAT PERKAWINAN CAMPURAN (STUDI PUTUSAN MK No: 69 /PUU/XIII/2015) Muhammad Rendy Rifki Putra; Heru Susetyo; Afdol Afdol
Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan Vol 11, No 1 (2022): Mei 2022
Publisher : Universitas Sriwijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/rpt.v11i1.1393

Abstract

Seringkali akibat hukum dari perkawinan khususnya perkawinan campuran yang mana para pihak mendapatkan halangan untuk melakukan perbuatan hukum terutama untuk memiliki hak atas tanah di Indonesia dikarenakan terjadinya pembulatan harta Bersama dengan warga negara asing dimana peraturan perundang-undangan mengenai pertanahan di Indonesia menganut asas Nasionalisme. Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 tentan Peraturan Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria mengatur mengenai subyek hukum yang dapat boleh memiliki hak atas tanah di Indonesia. Untuk Hak Milik, Hak Guna Bangunan dan Hak Guna Usaha hanya dapat dimiliki oleh Warga Negara Indonesia, sedangkan dalam perkawinan campuran apabila suami/isteri yang berkewarganegaraan Indonesia memiliki hak atas tanah tersebut, maka pasangannya yang berkewarganegaraan asing turut pula menjadi pemilik karena masuk dalam harta bersama. Persoalan ini timbul bagi para pihak perkawinan campuran sehingga penulis menggunakan metode penelitian pendekatan yuridis normatif dimana bersumber dari bahan-bahan hukum sekunder untuk memahami hukum sebagai perangkat peraturan atau norma positif di dalam perundang-undangan yang berlaku.