Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Penerapan Ketentuan Praktik Sita Jaminan atas Saham Guna Memperoleh Kepastian Hukum Adelia Audiana Gerchikova; Anita Afriana; Sherly Ayuna Putri
Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Vol 7, No 1 (2020): JURNAL ILMIAH PENEGAKAN HUKUM JUNI
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

This research is intended to assert the legal basis for Shares Guarantee Seizure implementation, and execution mechanism towards Court Judgement of Permanent Legal Force, based on positive laws as an actual legal basis in order to achieve legal certainty as a practice of Shares Guarantee Seizure. The research is conducted through normative juridical method approach with descriptive analytical research specifications, and data analysis performed with qualitative methods. This study results shown, first, the actual legal basis for the efforts of Shares Guarantee Seizure is contained in article 227 section (1) of HIR in conjunction with Article 511 of The Indonesian Civil Code, as long as its implementation fulfills the basic requirements. Secondly, there are several distinct in the execution mechanisms of Shares Guarantee Seizure towards limited companies and both mechanisms have not been asserted in HIR, therefore the rule itself became unclear, whereas rules supposed to achieve legal certainty. To obtain legal certainty, new product regulations for Procedure of Civil Law are required in legislation (wet) arrangement, which should accommodate most of legal issues dynamics in Indonesia.

Status Hukum Pekerja Yang diangkat Menjadi Anggota Direksi pada Perseroan Terbatas Tanpa Adanya Pengakhiran Perjanjian Kerja Bima Nuranda; Anita Afriana; Holyness N Singadimedja
Perspektif Hukum VOLUME 19 ISSUE 1
Publisher : Faculty of Law Hang Tuah University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30649/ph.v19i1.159

The appointment of a director in a Limited Liability Company can be chosen from its own workers. In reality, this raises a legal problem when the worker appointed to the Board of Directors is dismissed by the General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS), while the termination has been regulated in Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies, but when workers appointed as members of the board of directors do not accept such dismissals, the aforementioned directors choose to submit the fulfillment of their workers’ rights as stipulated in Law Number 13 of 2003 concerning Employment. From this problem, it can be inferred that there is a lack of clarity regarding the legal status of a worker who is appointed as a board of directors through GMS and the legal consequences when the worker appointed as director is dismissed.

Analisis Disparitas Putusan Pengadilan Niaga Dan Mahkamah Agung Terkait Kepailitan Terhadap Yayasan (Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor: 1262 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2022) Aman Wibawa Ginting; Elisatris Gultom; Anita Afriana
Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Vol. 3 No. 3 (2023): Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/innovative.v3i3.1992

Yayasan selaku badan hukum dapat dipailitkan jika tidak dapat membayar utang-utangnya. namun, Yayasan Rumah Sakit Sandi Karsa dinyatakan tidak pailit berdasarkan putusan Mahkamah Agung disaat tidak dapat membayar utangnya terhadap para kreditornya. oleh karena itu, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis putusan Pengadilan Niaga dan putusan Mahkamah Agung yang mengadili kasus kepailitan Yayasan Rumah Sakit Sandi Karsa. Penelitian ini didasarkan pada pendekatan yuridis normatif kemudian dianalisis dengan metode yuridis normative kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pada dasarnya Yayasan Rumah Sakit Sandi Karsa telah memenuhi unsur-unsur untuk dapat dipailitkan, dimana Yayasan Rumah Sakit Sandi Karsa memiliki dua kreditor dan tidak membayar lunas utang-utangnya sesuai tempo yang sudah ditentukan, serta harta kekayaan Yayasan yang tersisa setelah putusan Mahkamah Agung haruslah digunakan oleh Yayasan Rumah Sakit Sandi Karsa untuk melunasi utang-utangnya kepada para kreditornya agar adil bagi para kreditor dan hak yang dimiliki oleh para kreditor dapat terpenuhi.

The Annulment of Homologation in the Case of PKPU Application of Intidana Savings and Loan Cooperative in Review of Law Number 37 of 2004 Karina Widyadhari A.A.P*; Elisatris Gultom; Anita Afriana
Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities Vol 6, No 2 (2023): Social and Religious Aspect in History, Economic Science and Law
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/jr.v6i2.31817

The purpose of this research is to find out the annulment of homologation in the case of a PKPU application for KSP Intidana in terms of Law No. 37 of 2004. This research method is normative juridical which is guided by primary legal materials and secondary legal materials contained in a legislation. The results of the research show that first, the action of not accepting the annulment of homologation on the basis that the application submitted was premature is not in accordance with the provisions of the KPKPU Law because the concept of negligence as a reason for homologation annulment in the KPKPU Law is interpreted as an action where the debtor really does not fulfill the clauses agreed upon in the composition agreement, not waiting until the payment deadline expires. Secondly, the judge's action in not accepting the homologation annulment request submitted by KSP Intidana's creditors was inappropriate because it did not fulfil one of the principles of the decision in which the judge's decision must contain a clear basis.

The Annulment of Homologation in the Case of PKPU Application of Intidana Savings and Loan Cooperative in Review of Law Number 37 of 2004 Karina Widyadhari A.A.P*; Elisatris Gultom; Anita Afriana
Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities Vol 6, No 2 (2023): Social and Religious Aspect in History, Economic Science and Law
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/jr.v6i2.31817

The purpose of this research is to find out the annulment of homologation in the case of a PKPU application for KSP Intidana in terms of Law No. 37 of 2004. This research method is normative juridical which is guided by primary legal materials and secondary legal materials contained in a legislation. The results of the research show that first, the action of not accepting the annulment of homologation on the basis that the application submitted was premature is not in accordance with the provisions of the KPKPU Law because the concept of negligence as a reason for homologation annulment in the KPKPU Law is interpreted as an action where the debtor really does not fulfill the clauses agreed upon in the composition agreement, not waiting until the payment deadline expires. Secondly, the judge's action in not accepting the homologation annulment request submitted by KSP Intidana's creditors was inappropriate because it did not fulfil one of the principles of the decision in which the judge's decision must contain a clear basis.

Analisis Perjanjian Jual Beli Tanah Yang Berstatus Dijaminkan Kepada Pihak Ketiga Menurut Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Terkait Olwintra Sitorus; Anita Afriana; Kilkoda Agus Saleh
Hakim Vol 2 No 2 (2024): Mei : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Sosial
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51903/hakim.v2i2.1736

Sale and purchase of land agreement is a legal act that involves two provisions, which are the provisions of agreement law and the provisions of agrarian law.. Sale and purchase of land agreement can’t be made privately and might cause disputes in the future. This dispute can cause losses for certain parties so that legal action is needed. The purpose of this research is to understand and examine the validity of the transfer of land rights through sale and purchase agreement related to its status that is guaranteed to third parties and the legal action that can be taken by the land buyer as the disadvantaged party because of the transfer of land and/or building rights through sale and purchase agreement related to its status that is guaranteed to third parties. The research uses a normative juridical approach method with analytical descriptive research specifications. Data collection technique in this research is obtained through literature study which was then analyzed using qualitative juridicial method. The analysis shows that the validity of the transfer of land rights through sale and purchase agreement related to its status that is guaranteed to third parties is invalid. That situation violates the legal terms of the agreement which results in the agreement being null and void. The land buyer as the party who is disadvantaged by these actions can file a legal act which is a civil lawsuit. The existence of a court judgement is a form of legal certainty for the parties in dispute to obtain their rights.

Kepastian Hukum Direksi Yang Merangkap Sebagai Pendiri Perseroan Perorangan Dalam Meningkatkan Status Menjadi Perseroan Terbatas di Hadapan Notaris Salma Syifaya Hilmansyah; Anita Afriana; Purnama Trisnamansyah
Syntax Literate Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia
Publisher : Syntax Corporation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36418/syntax-literate.v7i9.14331

Penelitian ini mengeksplorasi isu kepastian hukum terkait posisi direktur yang merangkap sebagai pendiri dalam perseroan perorangan yang berupaya meningkatkan statusnya menjadi perseroan terbatas. Fokus penelitian terletak pada aspek hukum yang mencakup proses perubahan status di hadapan notaris. Analisis dilakukan terhadap kerangka hukum yang mengatur peralihan status perusahaan, dengan mempertimbangkan implikasi dan tanggung jawab hukum yang mungkin timbul. Temuan penelitian ini diharapkan dapat memberikan pemahaman yang lebih baik terkait aspek hukum dalam upaya meningkatkan status perusahaan.

CONTEMPT OF COURT: PENEGAKAN HUKUM DAN MODEL PENGATURAN DI INDONESIA / CONTEMPT OF COURT: LAW ENFORCEMENT AND RULE MODELS IN INDONESIA Anita Afriana; Artaji Artaji; Elis Rusmiati; Efa Laela Fakhriah; Sherly Putri
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 7, No 3 (2018)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.7.3.2018.441-458

Di Indonesia sesungguhnya banyak kasus yang terjadi berkaitan dengan pelecehan terhadap pengadilan dan aparat penegak hukum. Hal tersebut berpengaruh terhadap integritas dan kewibawaan lembaga peradilan sebagai benteng terakhir untuk mendapatkan keadilan. Namun, sampai saat ini di Indonesia belum ada ketentuan yang secara khusus mengatur tentang pranata Contempt of Court. Artikel ini merupakan bagian dari penelitian yang telah selesai dilakukan dengan metode yuridis normatif yang mengedepankan data sekunder dengan dilengkapi data primer berupa penelitian lapangan yang dilakukan pada beberapa pengadilan negeri yang ada di Indonesia. Pembahasan difokuskan pada permasalahan eksistensi pengaturan dan penegakan hukum Contempt of Court serta menentukan model pengaturannya di Indonesia. Peraturan perundang-undangan yang mengatur tentang Contempt of Court secara khusus sampai saat ini masih belum ada. Akan tetapi, pengaturannya telah tersebar dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP). Oleh karena itu, dari sekian kasus terkait dengan Contempt of Court baik berupa tindakan maupun perbuatan yang sesungguhnya mengganggu keselamatan, ketenangan psikis maupun fisik, serta apa pun yang pada prinsipnya merupakan bentuk penghinaan terhadap pengadilan belum diberikan sanksi yang tegas tetapi hanya sekedar dikeluarkan dari ruang persidangan. Contempt of Court dapat terjadi baik di dalam ruang persidangan maupun di luar persidangan baik pada perkara pidana, perdata, maupun hubungan industrial. Semakin meluaskan berbagai tindakan yang dapat dikategorikan sebagai contempt of court maka perlu untuk mengatur Contempt of Court dalam bentuk aturan tersendiri.This crisis of public confidence greatly affects the integrity and authority of the judiciary as the last defence for justice. Many things happened related to the harassment of the courts and law enforcement agencies but until now in Indonesia there has been no provision specifically about contempt for the court. This article is a part of research that its used normative judicial method which gave priority to primary data with secondary and primary data. Therefore, field research was conducted by interviewing judge in some district court in Indonesia. The purpose of this research is to know the existence of regulation and law enforcement of Contempt of Court in Indonesia and to determine the model of Contempt of Court arrangement that is in accordance with the judiciary in Indonesia, and the summary is the laws and regulations governing the Contempt of Court in particular have so far not existed, but are scattered in the Criminal Code (Criminal Code), therefore in many cases both actions and deeds which in principle interfere with safety, psychic and physical calm which in principle is a form of humiliation to the court has not been given strict sanctions but only just removed from the courtroom. Contempt of Court can take place both within the courtroom and outside the court so that by extending the various actions that can be categorized as contempt of court, it is deemed necessary to regulate the Contempt of Court in the form of a separate rule.

Title

Found 8 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 8 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 8 Documents
Search