Articles
<![CDATA[Re-Formulasi Ketentuan Korupsi Sektor Swasta Komparatif Indonesia Dengan New Zealand ]]>
<![CDATA[Hasrina Nurlaily]]>;
<![CDATA[Rusmilawati Windari]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Ius Constituendum Vol 7, No 1 (2022): APRIL ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Semarang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.26623/jic.v7i1.3224
<![CDATA[Tujuan penelitian ini untuk melakukan pengaturan pemidanaan terhadap suatu Tujuan penelitian ini untuk melakukan pengaturan pemidanaan terhadap suatu tindak pidana korupsi sektor swasta yang nantinya dijadikan acuan penegak hukum dalam menjatuhkan pemidanaannya. Korupsi dapat terjadi di sektor publik dan sektor swasta. Secara internasional United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) mengatur tindak pidana korupsi sektor swasta. Salah satu negara yang mengatur tindak pidana korupsi sektor swasta yaitu New Zealand. Di Indonesia tidak mengatur tindak pidana korupsi sektor swasta, sehingga penelitian ini penting dikaji mengenai kebijakan hukum pidana yang akan datang mengenai tindak pidana korupsi sektor swasta di Indonesia. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan perbandingan. Kebaharuan pada penelitian ini terletak pada objek kajiannya yakni untuk merumuskan kebijakan hukum pidana mendatang mengenai suap sektor swasta sebagai tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia. Dari kajian yang dilakukan diperoleh hasil yakni: (1) tindak pidana korupsi sektor swasta belum diatur secara spesifik dalam peraturan tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia, namun telah disiapkan dalam Rancangan Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, dan (2) perlu pembaharuan Rancangan Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi terkait perluasan norma penyuapan dan unsur perbuatan, pengaturan tindak pidana korupsi sektor swasta dalam satu peraturan perundang-undangan, perluasan subjek hukum, serta persamaan pengenaan ancaman penyuapan aktif dan pasif. The purpose of this study is to regulate the punishment of a criminal act of corruption in the private sector which will later serve as law enforcement in imposing the sentence. Internationally, the United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) regulates private sector corruption. New Zealand is the country that regulates private sector corruption. Indonesia does not regulate private sector corruption so this research important study for future criminal law policies regarding corruption criminal acts in the private sector in Indonesia. This research is normative legal research using statute and comparative approaches. The novelty of this research lies in the object of the study, namely to formulate future legal policies regarding bribery in the private sector as a criminal act of corruption in Indonesia Corruption can be occurred in the public and private sectors. The results of this study are: (1) the corruption criminal act in the private sector has not been specifically regulated in the laws and regulations of corruption in Indonesia, but it has been prepared in the Corruption Eradication law draft, and (2) it is needed to renew the Corruption Eradication law draft which is related to the expansion of the bribery norm and elements of action, the regulation of corruption criminal act in the private sector in a single law and regulation, the extension of legal subjects, and equality in the imposition of threats between active and passive bribery.]]>
<![CDATA[Illegal Levies as a Negative Element Contributing to The Decrease of The Tourism Potential on Madura ]]>
<![CDATA[Tolib Effendi]]>;
<![CDATA[Rusmilawati Windari]]>
<![CDATA[ International Journal of Business, Economics, and Social Development Vol 3, No 1 (2022) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Research Collaboration Community (RCC) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.46336/ijbesd.v3i1.172
<![CDATA[As revealed by the World Economic Forum, there is a correlation between corruption and tourism: the higher the level of corruption of a state, as reflected in the Corruption Perceptions Index of Transparency International, the lower the number of foreign tourists visiting the state. As such, a very strong correlation exists between the community development index, tourism, and the community’s legal awareness on the journey to the eradication of illegal fees. Illegal fees have to date been regarded as something normal in society. Illegal fees have become a regular in every sector, which must be ceased, and this holds true to the tourism sector as well. It is thus become essential to study the correlation between illegal fees in the tourism sector and the undermined tourism potential on Madura.Illegal fees have become part of the systems applied in Indonesia, including in the tourism sector. One of the reasons behind visitors’ disinterest in visiting a tourist attraction is the illegal fees someone imposes there, whether they be in the form of entrance fees or in the form of parking fees. The absence of a price standard allows some irresponsible persons to collect such fees as entrance and parking fees at tourist attractions variably according to the situation that arises in a given time.This paper uses a socio-legal research method to investigate directly into the relationship between illegal fees in the tourism sector and the undermined tourism potential on Madura. Primary data, collected through interviews, survey, and observation, were analyzed descriptively.]]>
<![CDATA[Child Rights and Human Security: Promoting Child Protection At The Tourist Attractions On Madura ]]>
<![CDATA[Rusmilawati Windari]]>;
<![CDATA[Tolib Effendi]]>
<![CDATA[ International Journal of Business, Economics, and Social Development Vol 2, No 4 (2021) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Research Collaboration Community (RCC) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.46336/ijbesd.v2i4.171
<![CDATA[Tourism nowadays is a promising as well as challenging industry. The need for having leisure, relaxation, and inner satisfaction is not of the tertiary nature, but the primary one. Each country, of course, is actively improving its own tourist attractions for its economic growth. Madura, as a big island in East Java with many tourist attractions, is in a continuous improvement in the last five years. Unfortunately, child protection has not been considered a significant part of the designing of good tourism. Given that children are the main targets of tourism, good, peaceful tourism will be realized with the fulfillment of child rights at the tourist attractions. This paper is a socio-legal research work that uses primary data from observations and interviews with relevant respondents. All of the data are analyzed in a descriptive-qualitative manner. This paper aims at exploring and analyzing the efforts made by local governments in promoting child protection through human security at the tourist attractions on Madura. Moreover, it also describes the obstacles faced by these local governments along with some solutions to such obstacles. The main finding is Sampang Regency has initiated a role of the service in charge in child protection, which is currently assumed by the Social Service, across all regional strategic development fields, including the tourism sector.]]>
<![CDATA[Penggunaan Hukum Disiplin (Corporal Punishment) pada Anak Di Lingkungan Sekolah Dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana di Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Rusmilawati Windari]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum PRIORIS Vol. 4 No. 3 (2015): Jurnal Hukum Prioris Volume 4 Nomor 3 Tahun 2015 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Trisakti University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (1535.619 KB)
|
DOI: 10.25105/prio.v4i3.388
<![CDATA[Perkembangan internasional dewasa ini menunjukkan bahwa praktek penggunaan corporal punishment terhadap anak di segala situasi baik di rumah, sekolah, maupun, sistem peradilan pidana anak tidak lagi dibenarkan. Hukuman fisik (corporal punishment) yang acapkali digunakan sebagai metode yang ampuh untuk mendidik dan mendisiplinkan anak mulai dipandang sebagai salah satu bentuk kekerasan dan pelanggaran hak asasi anak atas keutuhan integritas fisik dan mentalnya. Tidak seperti negara-negara di Eropa yang kebanyakan telah melakukan gerakanhukum (legal movement) dengan melarang segala bentuk praktek corporal punishment terhadap anak, negara-negara di Asia Tenggara, termasuk Indonesia, pelarangan atas praktek corporal punishment masih menuai perdebatan. Di Indonesia, istilah corporal punishment ini lebih banyak dikaitkan dengan konteks peradilan pidana, dan bukan dalam konteks upaya merawat dan mendidik anak di lingkungan rumah dan sekolah. Belum adanya aturan yang spesifik memberikan definisi yuridis maupun larangan akan praktek corporal punishment terhadap anak tersebut, menyebabkan praktek corporal punishment tersebut masih dipandang sebagai bentuk penganiayaan pada umumnya walaupun secara kontekstual keduanya memiliki hakekat yang berbeda.]]>
<![CDATA[Dualisme Konsep Pungutan Liar sebagai Tindak Pidana Korupsi dan Tindak Pidana Umum ]]>
<![CDATA[Tolib Effendi]]>;
<![CDATA[Rusmilawati Windari]]>
<![CDATA[ Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol. 8 No. 2 (2022): INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.32697/integritas.v8i2.876
<![CDATA[The absence of delineation regarding the imposition of illegal levies under Presidential Regulation No. 87 of 2016 on the Illegal Levy Eradication Task Force has driven law enforcers, especially the Illegal Levy Eradication Task Force (Saber Pungli), to be varied in establishing delineation in the enforcement of illegal levy affairs. The imposition of illegal levies is treated by law enforcers as a corruption offence as well as an extortion offence. The issues raised in this research concern how the offence of imposing illegal levies should be formulated in alignment with criminal law concepts and the reality in society, as well as whether the imposition of illegal levies should be categorised as a corruption offence. The aim of this paper is to review the regulation of the imposition of illegal levies as a corruption offence, as well as the implementation of the law. This research uses a normative research method with statute and conceptual approaches. The legal sources were analysed deductively from the general to the specific. The concept used in this review is the basic concept in criminal law regarding general criminal laws and special criminal laws. Based on the results, this research concluded that the government should confirm the delineation of acts categorised as the imposition of illegal levies, regardless of whether it is part of the corruption offence category or not.]]>
<![CDATA[Perbandingan Konsep Recidive dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 dengan Criminal Act of South Korea ]]>
<![CDATA[Busthomi Arifin]]>;
<![CDATA[Rayhan Afief Arfarizky]]>;
<![CDATA[Rusmilawati Windari]]>
<![CDATA[ Kertha Patrika Vol 45 No 2 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/KP.2023.v45.i02.p04
<![CDATA[The purpose of this research is to explore the concept of criminal recidivism between Indonesia and South Korea. The research method employed is normative research using a statute approach, a comparative approach, and a conceptual approach. The research findings reveal that Indonesia and South Korea regulate recidivism with distinct approaches that correspond to the characteristics of each country. In Indonesia, the regulations on recidivism are stipulated in Article 23 of the Indonesian Penal Code, while in South Korea, they are found in Articles 35-36 of the Criminal Act of South Korea. A notable difference is that in South Korea, an individual is considered a recidivist if they repeat a criminal offense that is punishable by imprisonment or a more severe penalty, such as penal servitude or the death penalty. In Indonesia, the aggravation of punishment for recidivism is limited to a one-third increase from the initial penalty, whereas in South Korea, it can be escalated up to twice the initial penalty. Recommendations that can be considered based on the comparison between the two countries include a fair evaluation of recidivism cases, an effective rehabilitation system, a focus on prevention efforts, proportional punishment, as well as enhanced research and monitoring.]]>
<![CDATA[VICTIM IMPACT STATEMENT DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA: SEBUAH URGENSI HUKUM ]]>
<![CDATA[Anggi Mustavia Maulani]]>;
<![CDATA[Rusmilawati Windari]]>
<![CDATA[ RechtIdee Vol 17, No 1 (2022): June ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Trunojoyo Madura University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.21107/ri.v17i1.14369
<![CDATA[In criminal justice system, the impact of crime suffered by victims is less considered. In international sphere, the consideration of impact suffered by the victim is known as the Victim Impact Statement (VIS). It is geared to determine the importance of VIS in the criminal justice system in Indonesia. This research is a normative legal research with statutory and conceptual approaches. All of the data are collected by using library and online search. Based on the research results, the urgency of VIS regulation is seen from 4 (four) basis, namely: (1) philosophical basis, the value of justice is the right of all people in equal treatment before the law; (2) the juridical basis, the limitations of the rules that explicitly regulate the rights of victims in the trial; (3) the political basis, the government has accommodated the Basic Principles of justice for victims of crime and abuse power 1985; (4) sociological basis, victims often experience injustice, VIS must be regulated to provide opportunities for victims to voice the impact of crimes suffered by them. The regulation of VIS will give space for victim involvement in the judicial process and gaining satisfaction with the judge's decision.]]>
<![CDATA[Implemetasi Child Friendly Tourism Di Pulau Madura (Studi Lapangan Tempat Wisata Di Empat Kabupaten Di Pulau Madura) ]]>
<![CDATA[Widyaristanty, Sarah]]>;
<![CDATA[Windari, Rusmilawati]]>
<![CDATA[ Inicio Legis Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trunojoyo Madura Vol 3, No 1 (2022): Juni ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Trunojoyo Madura ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (333.593 KB)
|
DOI: 10.21107/il.v3i1.14243
<![CDATA[Anak sebagai generasi emas penerus bangsa sudah sepantasnya mendapatkan hak-haknya sebagaimana yang telah diatur dalam undang-undang perlindungan anak. Selain wajib mendapatkan hak-haknya, anak tentunya juga harus mendapatkan perlindungan dari hal-hal yang nantinya dapat menganggu pertumbuhan serta perkembangan anak. Dalam Pasal 20 Undang-Undang Perlindungan Anak mengatur bahwasannya terkait perlindungan anak tidak hanya menjadi tanggung jawab orang tua saja, akan tetapi juga tanggung jawab negara dan orang-orang yang ada di sekitarnya. Komisi Perlindungan Anak Indonesia pada saat ini juga mefokuskan pemenuhan serta perlindungan hak-hak anak terutama dalam ruang lingkup tempat wisata. Hal ini dikarenakan tempat wisata merupakan sebuah tempat yang banyak dikunjungi oleh anak. Salah satu hak yang ada dalam Pasal 11 Udang-Undang Perlindungan Anak adalah anak berhak untuk bermain. Dalam penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian hukum empiris. Metode penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yang mengkaji pelaksanaan atau implementasi aturan perundang-undangan secara faktual pada peristiwa hukum yang terjadi dalam masyarakat. Kesimpulan dari adannya penelitian ini adalah pemenuhan serta perlindungan hak-hak anak di tempat wisata yang ada di 4 (empat) kabupaten di Pulau Madura masih kurang, hal ini karena tidak adanya koordinasi antara dinas-dinas yang terkait serta tempat-tempat yang kurang ramah anak kurangnya fasilitas yang ramah dan aman bagi anak.Kata Kunci : Anak, Perlindungan, Tempat Wisata]]>
<![CDATA[Comparison of Indonesian and Norwegian Laws regarding Criminal Responsibility of perpetrators with Intellectual/Mental Disabilities ]]>
<![CDATA[Via Dianti, Pingkan Okta]]>;
<![CDATA[Andini, Maria Angela Putri]]>;
<![CDATA[Windari, Rusmilawati]]>;
<![CDATA[Da Silva, Eugenia Brandao]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Suara Hukum Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024): Jurnal Suara Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Negeri Surabaya ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.26740/jsh.v6n1.p68-90
<![CDATA[The criminal responsibility of offenders with mental or intellectual disabilities varies significantly across legal systems, influencing policies within the criminal justice framework. In some jurisdictions, provisions exist allowing for the consideration of disabilities as grounds for exoneration or mitigation of punishment. The reform of Indonesia's Criminal Code in 2023, particularly Articles 38 and 39, addresses the issue of criminal responsibility for individuals with mental or intellectual disabilities. However, challenges arise when the concept of diminished criminal liability is tied more to the defendant's mental or intellectual condition rather than their culpability in the criminal act itself. This study aims to examine and compare these legal regulations and policies with those of Norway. Using a juridical-normative method with legislative and comparative approaches, the research seeks to elucidate the differences in how Indonesia and Norway handle the criminal responsibility of offenders with disabilities. By doing so, this paper aims to clarify the regulatory frameworks governing the exoneration and reduction of criminal liability for individuals with disabilities in Indonesia, ensuring that law enforcement practices align with the rights and considerations afforded to such individuals]]>
<![CDATA[Comparison of the Legal Regulation of the Rechterlijk Pardon in Indonesia and the Netherlands ]]>
<![CDATA[Estiningtyas, Aulia Rizka]]>;
<![CDATA[Ulfatul Hasanah]]>;
<![CDATA[Windari, Rusmilawati]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Suara Hukum Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024): Jurnal Suara Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Negeri Surabaya ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.26740/jsh.v6n1.p162-186
<![CDATA[The concept of rechterlijk pardon represents a new legal formulation introduced in Indonesia through Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code, aimed at aligning criminal law with contemporary societal conditions. Beyond traditional deterrence, this concept empowers judges to consider mitigating circumstances and individual offender situations. Several European countries, including the Netherlands, have long regulated rechterlijk pardon, prompting a comparative analysis of its application between the Netherlands and Indonesia. This normative legal research compares the provisions of rechterlijk pardon in the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP) with those in Dutch law. The findings reveal both similarities and differences: both systems require judges to justify their decision for granting pardon and offer alternative pardon requirements, yet Indonesia includes specific considerations of justice not detailed in Dutch law. The study underscores the importance of clarifying the criteria for rechterlijk pardon implementation in Indonesia to preempt potential conflicts. Ultimately, the research advocates for a clear and harmonized framework for judicial pardon in Indonesia, ensuring consistency and fairness in its application within the criminal justice system]]>
