Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
69,713
41,001


Apple's "A20" chip designed for next year's iPhone models could be considerably more expensive, the China Times reports.

a20-chip-feature.jpg

The A20 chip is likely to be the first widely available 2-nanometer chip, debuting in the iPhone 18 lineup next year and forming the foundation of subsequent M6-series chips. The previous three generation A-series chips have all been based on TMSC's 3-nanometer node, with the upgrade to 2-nanometer promising further performance and efficiency improvements.

TSMC has reportedly told customers, presumably including Apple, to expect pricing that is at least 50% higher than 3-nanometer processors. This is attributed to unusually high capital expenditure for the new node and to the lack of discounting strategies while yields are still in their early acceptable phase.

The report further states that suppliers expect flagship mobile chips built on the 2-nanometer process to carry unit prices around $280 once volume production begins. This would make it the most expensive component in the iPhone and dramatically affect Apple's profit margins, if the increase is not passed on to customers.

A report from DigiTimes last year placed the cost of the A18 chip at around $45, with a total hardware bill of $416 for a model that retailed at $799, implying that the chip represents roughly 10% of bill of materials (BOM) cost and about 5–6% of retail price before logistics and development expenses. The most expensive component in that teardown was the rear camera assembly rather than the chip.

If the component cost rumors are true, Apple could limit 2-nanometer chips to only some 2026 iPhone models, such as the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max. In September last year, Apple analyst Ming-Chi Kuo warned that "due to cost concerns, not all new iPhone 18 models may be equipped with a 2-nanometer processor."

Article Link: Apple's A20 Chip Could Be Massively More Expensive
 
Segment the product line. 6 Iphones with the upper-tier Pro models having the A20 Pro chip, 2 using the regular, and 2 the cut-down chip. People who want the finest chip in the industry need to pay, no such thing as a free lunch.
 
Well, we already know there will be no base iPhone 18 until spring 2027 at the earliest, and that 18 very well could end up being a replacement for the “e” line.
So the Air2, Pro/Pro Max and Fold.
All already above $1000.
 
Would anyone really and truly care if iPhone and new Mac releases went to every two years? This growth strat is just for Apple's stock price and their marketing departments to convince you of "THIS REALLY IS AN UPGRADE"
 
Bla bla, Apple has multiyear agreements with all its key suppliers in place, incl TSMC. Will the new process be more expensive, yes. Massively? No
That's just a click bait title...
 
  • Like
Reactions: trusso
There’s nothing to stop Apple from retaining 3nm for the A20 and using 2nm for the A20 Pro and M chips.

After all, the base ‘A’ chips are typically found in a wide range of devices and it’s likely that few of those customers would appreciate the value of going down a process node.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: jz0309
Segment the product line. 6 Iphones with the upper-tier Pro models having the A20 Pro chip, 2 using the regular, and 2 the cut-down chip. People who want the finest chip in the industry need to pay, no such thing as a free lunch.
This is… Literally what they already do.
Literally look at any of their product lines.
The base iPad gets the A16, the iPad mini gets the A17, the iPad Air gets the M3 and the iPad Pro the M4.
Even the current iPhones, the lower down the product line you go the worse the GPU is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: thewebb
This could also be the reason for staggered release. The Pro’s + Air/Fold in September and base models following Spring ones yields are better.
 
OK this is in pro phones only then. But that's OK.

The A19 seems very fast on the regular 17 when I've played around it in an Apple Store. The A18 is no slouch either.

More battery life, better cameras and better drop and screen protection are more welcome.
 
You literally see Apple compensating for this by releasing the base iPhone 18 six months later so 18 Pro buyers eat some of the upfront costs related to low yield. The costs for N2 have been forecasted for a long time.

Apple tried a similar strategy with iPhone 14 and 15, but people really didn’t like buying phones with chips a full generation behind. So the new strategy is staggering launches.
 
  • Like
Reactions: anakin44011
Would anyone really and truly care if iPhone and new Mac releases went to every two years? This growth strat is just for Apple's stock price and their marketing departments to convince you of "THIS REALLY IS AN UPGRADE"
Those on the oldest iPhones and needing to upgrade would care, and it would make more recent Android models more attractive.
 
I'm guessing this is part of why rumors are pointing to the base iPhone 18 not being released in September 2026 and it coming in spring 2027. They could develop a 2 nm A20 Pro chip for the iPhone Pro models (and Air?) and the spring release of the base model could just be driven by waiting for improved yields with the 2 nm process to release a slightly more cut down 2 nm A20 chip. I suppose they could also develop another 3 nm A20 chip for the base iPhone, or even just release it with the A19 Pro chip, although if that was the case I don't see why they would wait until the next spring.
 
They really needs to do something about these names...A20 is just a way dumber name than A19.
 
Sounds like another M3. First on a new architecture, expensive, not in the entire product line, and quickly replaced in Apple’s supply chain by the next cheaper, better generation.
 
I'm guessing this is part of why rumors are pointing to the base iPhone 18 not being released in September 2026 and it coming in spring 2027. They could develop a 2 nm A20 Pro chip for the iPhone Pro models (and Air?) and the spring release of the base model could just be driven by waiting for improved yields with the 2 nm process to release a slightly more cut down 2 nm A20 chip. I suppose they could also develop another 3 nm A20 chip for the base iPhone, or even just release it with the A19 Pro chip, although if that was the case I don't see why they would wait until the next spring.

The N2 process yields are improved with time and die size. Having a base A20 chip is almost certainly the case for iPhone 18.
 
They really needs to do something about these names...A20 is just a way dumber name than A19.

They could go the AMD and Intel route and come out with an endless amount of new chip names. I for one welcome the Apple A20 Ultra 9 Pro Max 7700X3D-KF
 
There you go. The reason why we need Intel cutting edge foundry processes (or at least someone else)..... Let's hope 18A & 14A are a success. Fun fact TSMC 2NM is NOT EUV as Intel bought all available machines from ASML for the period.
 
If it's a choice between longer bars on a benchmark slide and avoiding a price hike two years in a row, Apple is going to go with the latter and just have less of a performance increase for next year's iPhones.
 
So... $45(N3) x 50% is approximately $22
$22 buys you... A TSMC reported performance increase of N2 over N3; "It delivers an approximate 18% performance boost, reduces power consumption by approximately 36%, and increase transistor density by around 20% compared to N3E."
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.