Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/2025/October

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Proposals, October 2025

[edit]

Please check how many articles qualify for a stub type before proposing it.

NEW PROPOSALS

[edit]

Central Bosnia Canton geography sub-stubs

[edit]

Central Bosnia Canton geography stubs is pretty big; I propose the following split:

Zenica-Doboj Canton geography sub-stubs

[edit]

Zenica-Doboj Canton geography stubs is pretty beefy; I propose the following splits:

Ardabil province geography sub-stubs

[edit]

Ardabil province geography stubs deserves some extra splits:

Split of Louisiana geography stubs

[edit]

We have split Louisiana by parish templates but no PArish was big enough for its own category therefore I suggest we split by region based on this image

Regions of Louisiana

{{BienvilleParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{BossierParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{CaddoParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{CaldwellParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{ClaiborneParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{DeSotoParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{EastCarrollParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{FranklinParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{JacksonParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{LincolnParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{MadisonParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{MorehouseParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{OuachitaParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{RedRiverParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{RichlandParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{TensasParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{UnionParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{WebsterParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{WestCarrollParishLA-geo-stub}} and {{WinnParishLA-geo-stub}}

{{AllenParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{BeauregardParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{CatahoulaParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{ConcordiaParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{GrantParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{LaSalleParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{NatchitochesParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{RapidesParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{SabineParishLA-geo-stub}} and {{VernonParishLA-geo-stub}}

{{AcadiaParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{AscensionParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{AssumptionParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{AvoyellesParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{CalcasieuParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{CameronParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{EvangelineParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{IberiaParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{IbervilleParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{JeffersonDavisParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{LafayetteParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{LafourcheParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{PointeCoupeeParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{StCharlesParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{StJamesParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{StJohntheBaptistParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{StLandryParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{StMartinParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{StMaryParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{TerrebonneParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{VermilionParishLA-geo-stub}} and {{WestBatonRougeParishLA-geo-stub}}

{{EastBatonRougeParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{EastFelicianaParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{LivingstonParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{StHelenaParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{StTammanyParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{TangipahoaParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{WashingtonParishLA-geo-stub}} and {{WestFelicianaParishLA-geo-stub}}

{{JeffersonParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{OrleansParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{PlaqueminesParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{StBernardParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{StCharlesParishLA-geo-stub}}, {{StJamesParishLA-geo-stub}} and {{StJohntheBaptistParishLA-geo-stub}} Waacstats (talk) 07:24, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Telecommunication stubs

[edit]

About to break 700 I propose we split out the following categories:

Waacstats (talk) 07:24, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Phytoseiidae stubs

[edit]

Another one getting large with two possible splits:

Waacstats (talk) 07:24, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Liberal Party of Australia politician stubs

[edit]

Category is ready to break into the 600 club, I propose the following splilt:

Waacstats (talk) 07:24, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Australia television show stubs

[edit]

Starting to creep up, I propose the following two splits per other countries that we have split:

Waacstats (talk) 07:24, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Australia athletics biographies

[edit]

We have another athletics category break the 600 mark, propose we split this like we have with other countries, by event:

Waacstats (talk) 07:24, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oklahoma and the Dakotas

[edit]

Following on from last month, all three states are starting to get large. I would like to propose splitting these with by county templates, categories for any that make 60 and then we can more clearly see what we have regarding regional categories. Templates and categories of the following formats for each county:

Waacstats (talk) 07:24, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cicindelidae stubs

[edit]

Over 600 articles, can easily be split by the following two categories:

Waacstats (talk) 07:24, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

speedy

[edit]

A few speedies for this week:

Waacstats (talk) 07:24, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Compact object stub

[edit]

Compact object stubs ({{compact-object-stub}}) For neutron stars and black holes. Found 76 applicable articles via category search. Shocksingularity (talk) 05:49, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Presumably the parent cat would be Category:Compact stars? Her Pegship (?) 19:28, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, plus possibly some intermediate-mass/supermassive BHs Shocksingularity (talk) 21:11, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hymenobacter stubs

[edit]

I propose making Hymenobacter stubs ({{Hymenobacter-stub}}) for over 60 articles in Cytophagia stubs - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:23, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Myrmicinae sub-stub

[edit]

Myrmicinae stubs is pretty big; I propose the following split:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Potter wasp sub-stub

[edit]

Potter wasp stubs is pretty big; I propose the following sub-stub:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cicindelidae sub-stubs

[edit]

Cicindelidae stubs is pretty big; I propose the following splits:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lebiinae sub-stub

[edit]

Lebiinae stubs is pretty beefy; I propose the following split:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Trechinae sub-stub

[edit]

Trechinae stubs is pretty beefy, and not in the good way. I propose the following split:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Platyninae sub-stub

[edit]

Platyninae stubs is pretty big; I propose the following split:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Staphyliniformia stubs

[edit]

This category/template, Staphyliniformia stubs ({{Staphyliniformia-stub}}) will contain Staphylinoidea stubs and 353 pages - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 23:10, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bostrichoidea sub-stubs

[edit]

Bostrichoidea stubs is a little big; I propose the following splits:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Elaphidiini sub-stub

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Elaphidiini stubs is pretty big; I propose the following:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Saperdini sub-stub

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Saperdini stubs is pretty beefy. I propose the following subcats/temps:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Onciderini sub-stub

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Onciderini stubs is pretty big. I propose:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Mesosini sub-stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Mesosini stubs is pretty beefy, and not in the good way. I propose:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Agapanthiini sub-stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Agapanthiini stubs is getting really big; I propose the following splits:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Barisal Division geography sub-stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Barisal Division geography stubs is pretty beefy; I propose the following subcats/temps:

Support looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 21:51, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals/2025/October&oldid=1317612549"