Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If you are unable to complete a move for technical reasons, you can request technical help below. This is the correct method if you tried to move a page, but you got an error message saying something like "You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reasons:..." or "The/This page could not be moved, for the following reason:..."

  • Please make sure you really need technical assistance before making a request here. In particular, if the target page is a redirect back to the source page that has only one revision, you can usually move the page normally.
  • To list a technical request: edit the Uncontroversial technical requests subsection and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:
    {{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}
    
    This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page.
  • To request a reversion of a recent undiscussed move: Review the the guidelines at WP:RMUM of whether a reversion of an undiscussed move qualifies as uncontroversial and if so, edit the Requests to revert undiscussed moves subsection and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:
    {{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}
    
    This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page. Note that in some cases, clerks, such as administrators or page movers may determine that your request for a reversion does not pass the criteria and may move the request to the contested section or open a formal requested move discussion for potentially controversial moves on your behalf.
  • If you object to a proposal listed in the uncontroversial technical requests section, please move the request to the Contested technical requests section, append a note on the request elaborating on why, and sign with ~~~~. Consider pinging the requester to let them know about the objection.
  • If your technical request is contested, or if a contested request is left untouched without reply, create a requested move on the article talk and remove the request from the section here. The fastest and easiest way is to click the "discuss" button at the request, save the talk page, and remove the entry on this page. A bot will automatically remove contested requests after 72 hours of inactivity.

Technical requests

[edit]

Uncontroversial technical requests

[edit]

Requests to revert undiscussed moves

[edit]

Contested technical requests

[edit]
All reliable sources refer to him as "DeVante", no accent. 162 etc. (talk) 01:33, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Hukak to move forward, you can click "discuss", fill in your rationale and then click "publish" ASUKITE 14:28, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I would move to "Ingress Protection <code/rating>". The current title is too easily confusible with IP address, and the proposed title is too easily confusible with things like mw:IPoid, so I don't think this meets the relevant part of MOS:ACROTITLE that the abbreviation is primarily associated with the subject. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:54, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
When checking this, as well as trying to ensure we meet WP:NACTOR, it seems like they do meet notability, but in most of their articles I see without a hyphen. The official website does not overcome the commoname we see used in news sites reporting about the voice actor. [1] [2] [3] as well as the IMDB listing. Althought admittedly the was an interview that used the hyphenated version. TiggerJay(talk) 19:53, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This already has a pending AfC review, so please let that process finish, especially considering that your prior AfC review for this article was declined. TiggerJay(talk) 04:34, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Can you help me understand why the article and your claim above say "filming began" where the cited reference in the article says "production began" -- there is generally a difference between "principle filming" and "production". TiggerJay(talk) 03:49, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I've added an AFC submission template to the draft. I'd suggest that @KingArti utilise it if they think the article meets our notablity guidelines. TarnishedPathtalk 06:03, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Kuragehime000 The proposed name is an incomplete dab, as there are other musicians with that name. TiggerJay(talk) 04:47, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@St3095 This was moved to its current title in July 2022 with justification "no one plays an instrument in the group". Please take to a full discussion. TarnishedPathtalk 11:30, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Aspirex , because there was a move discussion at Talk:Preston Bullants Football Club, we should probably have another, especially since there have been several moves in recent history. ASUKITE 14:28, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator needed

[edit]