Jump to content

Template:Admin dashboard/light

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  1. Frequently, some pages transcluding {{Admin dashboard}} are going on overflow and appear at Category:Pages_where_post-expand_include_size_is_exceeded.
    This Template:Admin dashboard/light has been rewritten by including directly all the parts that were dispersed in so many sub-templates.
  2. The "leaks out boxes" error has been fixed.
  3. Pages RFPP and UNFAA are simply linked (i.e. not transcluded) when too busy


CAVEAT: all the |show= parameters have been set to 7 days.


Update this page
Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 0
Requests for unblock 34
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 9
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 46
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 4
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 212
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 0
Candidates for speedy deletion 31
Open sockpuppet investigations 204
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

AB = Administrative Backlogs

[edit]

Administrative backlog

[edit]
AfD debates relisted 3 or more times
All Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons
Copy to Wikimedia Commons with hidden file revisions
Requests for unblock
SPI cases awaiting administration
Wikipedia pages tagged for copyright problems
Template:Admin dashboard
Template:Admin dashboard/light
Template:Admin dashboard/light/sandbox
Template:Admin dashboard/uaarfpp
Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism
Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism/TB2
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion
Wikipedia:Closure requests
Wikipedia:Copyright problems
Template:Did you know/Queue
Template:DYK queue/backlog
Wikipedia:Files for discussion
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion
Wikipedia:Requested moves
Wikipedia:Requests for page protection
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/AutoWikiBrowser
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback
User talk:XLinkBot/RevertList
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations
Wikipedia:Templates for discussion
Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention/Bot
Wikipedia:WikiProject History Merge

WP:AIV

[edit]

AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism

Administrator intervention against vandalism

Reports

[edit]

Bot-reported

[edit]

User-reported

[edit]


CSD / PRODs

[edit]

CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions

Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
User requested 0
Empty articles 0
Nonsense pages 0
Spam pages 18
Importance or significance not asserted 1
Other candidates 12

The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )

Deletion backlog

{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat

BLP articles proposed for deletion by days left – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Proposed deletion – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 4 items

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 82 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 21 items

Requested RD1 redactions – 3 items

Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently

WP:UAA / WP:RFPP

[edit]

UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection

Usernames for administrator attention

Bot-reported

[edit]

User-reported

[edit]
Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

[edit]
Request addition of protection to a page, or increasing the current protection level
Shortcuts

Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Hyderabad Football Club

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP repeatedly vandalising the article by moving it (name change) mutiple times, even after "under construction " template was placed. The article is of a club whose name is changed due to rebranding. Kindly put a page protection immediately. It is causing too much disruption. Drat8sub (talk) 07:11, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

It is currently at S.C. Delhi Is that where it's supposed to be? Daniel Case (talk) 23:12, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

Mark Warford

[edit]

Reason: 2x copyvio in the past two weeks, first by an IP and second by a new user. SomeoneDreaming (talk) 19:56, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

Specifically I think temporary pending changes or semiprotection would work. It's not a very frequently edited article. SomeoneDreaming (talk) 19:57, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
I have initiated some non-templated discussion with the editor about what issues there are. Daniel Case (talk) 00:30, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

The Suicide Squad (film)

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated edit warring from IP, which was previously blocked for one week and returned to their disruption, only to be presently blocked for 31 hours. While protection is not really preemptive, I am requesting temporary protection to prevent further abuse and disruption from occurring. — Trailblazer101🔥 (discuss · contribs) 03:54, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Wonder Woman 1984

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated edit warring from IP, which was previously blocked for one week and returned to their disruption, only to be presently blocked for 31 hours. While protection is not really preemptive, I am requesting temporary protection to prevent further abuse and disruption from occurring. — Trailblazer101🔥 (discuss · contribs) 03:54, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

George Springer

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. tony 04:11, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Dejphon Chansiri

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Egghead06 (talk) 06:27, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Mount Zion

[edit]

Reason: An anonymous user (IP 51.223.134.141) has been repeatedly changing the page since 17 October 2025 without providing any explanation or engaging on the talk page despite requests to do so. Agmonsnir (talk) 06:45, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Nobody's attempted to contact the IP user on their talk page. Edit summaries are not a substitute for discussion. This is a content dispute. I have warned the IP about edit-warring. - The Bushranger One ping only 03:07, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

Anne-Marie

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. (CC) Tbhotch™ 06:46, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Gordie Howe International Bridge

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Hopefully semi-protection will prevent the edit war that an IP has been doing (and that TheTravelingGuy has decided to continue...). Turini2 (talk) 09:01, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

K'gari

[edit]

Reason: Requesting permanent protection as the page has had ongoing vandalism from IPs and new accounts for several years. The page has previously been temporarily protected but vandalism persists once this has lapsed. Turnagra (talk) 09:13, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

General debate of the eightieth session of the United Nations General Assembly

[edit]

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – This session is mainly about WP:PIA topic under ECR. Stylez995 (talk) 11:22, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Elxokas

[edit]

Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations. Entranced98 (talk) 11:31, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Charis Global School

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Entranced98 (talk) 11:34, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Quick follow-up - this seems to have died down, and thankfully it only went on for half an hour. Now that those responsible have been blocked where necessary, feel free to decline. Entranced98 (talk) 16:01, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Anton LaVey

[edit]

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Frequently the target of vandals and disruptive editors. SnowyRiver28 (talk) 11:52, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Harry Sisson (influencer)

[edit]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 12:23, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Template:New Zealand FIFA World Cup record

[edit]

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism. Template has previously been protected [1] but that only seems to serve as a temporary solution. Stevie fae Scotland (talk) 13:03, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Babushaan Mohanty

[edit]

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced puffery to the lede. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 13:05, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Tumminakatti

[edit]

Reason: Endless unsourced additions + PoV - has had to be semi-protected twice this year - Arjayay (talk) 13:07, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Charles Oliveira

[edit]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix (talk) 13:43, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Unnaipol Oruvan (2009 film)

[edit]

Reason: Edit warring LordStalin (talk) 13:50, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Fanum (streamer)

[edit]

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 14:06, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Sequel

[edit]

Reason: Continuous addition of grammatically incorrect original research by IP users. Signed, SleepyRedHair. (talk - contribs) 14:25, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Harare

[edit]

Reason: Talk:Harare#Heads up. Weird posters might alter this page; prediction seems to have come true Whyiseverythingalreadyused (talk) 14:38, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

W. W. Jacobs

[edit]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:13, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Blossoms Shanghai

[edit]

Semi-protection. Rastinition (talk) 15:45, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Aoxuan Lee

[edit]

Reason: Reason for protection: The page Aoxuan Lee has experienced repeated vandalism and unsourced or promotional edits from anonymous users. Requesting semi-protection to prevent further disruption. L3l4l5926 (talk) 16:07, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Securly

[edit]

Reason: Persistent Vandalism DudeJay17 (talk) 16:09, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Moana (2026 film)

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. — Trailblazer101🔥 (discuss · contribs) 16:40, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Jo Yuri

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 17:12, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:26, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Jain schools and branches

[edit]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Capankajsmilyo (talk) 17:49, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Suvarnabhumi Airport

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Constant addition of unsourced routes by various IPs. Danners430 tweaks made 19:14, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

2025 FIFA U-17 Women's World Cup

[edit]

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. Ikhouvanjou14 (talk) 01:19, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

Talk:R179 (New York City Subway car)

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 67.244.1.87 (talk) 01:27, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:32, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Already protected for some time. The Bushranger One ping only 02:47, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

Talk:R160 (New York City Subway car)

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 67.244.1.87 (talk) 01:27, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. No disruption since May. - The Bushranger One ping only 02:46, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

2026 FIFA World Cup qualification

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jalen Barks (Woof) 02:19, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

Surakarta

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper vandalism. Jalen Barks (Woof) 03:01, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

Semarang

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper vandalism. Jalen Barks (Woof) 03:01, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

Manado

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper vandalism. Jalen Barks (Woof) 03:01, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

Balikpapan

[edit]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper vandalism. Jalen Barks (Woof) 03:02, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

SS Edward L. Ryerson

[edit]

Semi-protection: Persistent unconstructive edits by an IP user, even after receiving a warning. ✦ Saltymagnolia ✦ 03:44, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

Chantal David

[edit]

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Continued drive-by edits by multiple IPs after removal protections. Edits also fall under WP:PIA related content. Morbidthoughts (talk) 03:53, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

[edit]
Request removal of protection from a page, or reducing the current protection level
Shortcuts

Before posting a request to this page, please discuss it with the protecting administrator first. You can create a request below only if you receive no response from them.

To find out which administrator protected the page, go to the page's edit history and click on the "View logs for this page" link (located underneath the page's title). The protecting administrator is listed in the protection log entry, next to the words "protected", "changed protection level", or "configured pending changes". If there are a large number of log entries on the page, use the drop-down menu near the top of the page and select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" to filter the logs accordingly.

DO NOT request a reduction in protection if...

  • ...you are being prevented from editing the page. A desire to change content is not a valid reason for unprotection. Instead:
    • If you can edit the article's talk page, use the WP:Edit Request Wizard to propose a change on the article's talk page. Include an explanation of the exact content that you want to change, and what the content will be afterward.
    • If the article's talk page is protected, you may propose a change at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Edit.
  • ...your reasoning for reducing protection is that the article has not been vandalized. That simply means the protection is working as intended.
  • ...your reasoning for reducing protection is basically "a long time has passed" without supporting details.
  • ...you haven't contacted the protecting administrator.

You may request a protection reduction below if...

  • ...you want to change the protection level of a template or module from full protection to template protection. You may add the request to this page without having to discuss it with the protecting administrator first.
  • ...you need to remove creation protection from a location where no page exists (redlinked pages) after a draft version of the intended article is prepared beforehand and ready to be published.
  • ...you are proposing a trial reduction in protection for a page that has been protected for several years, provided the proposal is supported by evidence such as talk page activity, page views, page traffic, number of watchers, frequency of edit requests, and prior history of vandalism.
  • ...the protecting administrator is inactive or has not responded to you in several days.

If you cannot locate your request, make sure to check the request archives to see if it's been moved there. Only requests that have been recently answered will still be listed here.

Shortcuts

Donald trump Tommy Robinson

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because .... The information published is false and biased to new levels Absolutely scandalous... . 83.216.48.6 (talk) 03:50, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

[edit]
Request a specific edit be made to a protected page
Please add an edit request to the talk page of the protected page before adding an edit request here
Shortcut

Edit requests should be made on the talk page of the protected article. You can create an edit request below only if the talk page is also protected, preventing you from adding a request there.

Otherwise, this is the correct place to use in order to add an edit request if you are unable to add one to the article's talk page. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to properly add a request.

Further information: Wikipedia:Edit requests


Handled requests

[edit]
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
Protected edit requests

7 protected edit requests
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Blocked text (request) 2025-09-12 16:11 Fully protected (log) Protected by MSGJ on 2022-02-25: "Highly visible template: used in interface messages"
MediaWiki:Autoblockedtext (request) 2025-09-14 19:58 MediaWiki page (log)
MediaWiki:Blockedtext (request) 2025-09-14 19:58 MediaWiki page (log) Protected by Ixfd64 on 2005-09-22: "ok test worked"
MediaWiki:Globalblocking-blockedtext-range (request) 2025-09-14 19:58 MediaWiki page (log)
Template:TFAFULL (request) 2025-09-20 14:24 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/Main Page/5 (log) Protected by Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection"
Template:Edit filter warning (request) 2025-10-14 19:31 Fully protected (log) Modified by MusikAnimal on 2019-02-25: "High-risk template or module; used in system message"
Module:Template parameter value (request) 2025-10-17 22:06 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/content (log) From Wikipedia/Protected templates: Protected by Rich Farmbrough on 2009-10-14: "Purpose of page - belt and braces."
Updated as needed. Last updated: 00:09, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
49 template-protected edit requests
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Hidden archive top (request) 2025-08-03 09:01 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mike V on 2014-08-01: "Highly visible template: per WP:RFPP request"
Template:Merge (request) 2025-08-12 19:08 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Module:Routemap (request) 2025-08-18 07:55 Template-protected (log) Modified by Materialscientist on 2016-11-21: "Highly visible template"
Template:Article for deletion (request) 2025-08-18 15:03 Template-protected (log) Modified by Fuhghettaboutit on 2013-11-02: "Enable access by template editors"
Template:Afd2 (request) 2025-08-20 19:47 Template-protected (log) Modified by Fuhghettaboutit on 2013-11-02: "Enable access by template editors"
Template:Edit COI (request) 2025-08-21 00:54 Template-protected (log) From Template:Request edit: Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
Template:Nutshell (request) 2025-08-22 09:02 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-11-12: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Template:Legend (request) 2025-08-23 01:36 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-20: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:Collapsible lists option (request) 2025-08-23 21:20 Template-protected (log) Protected by Zzuuzz on 2018-01-13: "High risk template"
Template:Post-nominals (request) 2025-08-26 21:42 Template-protected (log) Modified by Galobtter on 2019-03-07: "Highly visible template: 30000+ transclusions; while subpages are regularly edited by non-template editors, this does not appear to need so"
Template:IPA pulmonic consonants/table (request) 2025-08-27 19:29 Template-protected (log) Protected by Ivanvector on 2020-02-13: "Highly visible template"
Template:Old XfD multi (request) 2025-08-30 10:05 Template-protected (log) From Template:Old AfD multi: Modified by Callanecc on 2014-03-27: "Highly visible template: Over 80000 transclusions, allowing template editors"
Template:Afd-merged-from (request) 2025-08-30 10:07 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Image frame (request) 2025-08-31 18:04 Template-protected (log) Modified by Pppery on 2025-03-09: ""
Template:Country data Andorra (request) 2025-08-31 22:28 Template-protected (log) Modified by Courcelles on 2013-10-17: "Not quite high-risk enough now that we have a trusted template editor right."
Template:Talk quote inline (request) 2025-09-02 13:34 Template-protected (log) From Template:Talk quotation: Modified by KrakatoaKatie on 2016-06-02: "Highly visible template"
Template:Infobox automobile (request) 2025-09-02 22:17 Template-protected (log) Modified by Plastikspork on 2015-12-27: "Highly visible template"
Template:WikiProject cleanup listing (request) 2025-09-03 23:31 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Search box (request) 2025-09-04 00:25 Template-protected (log) Protected by Callanecc on 2014-02-05: "Highly visible template"
Template:Always substitute (request) 2025-09-06 14:12 Template-protected (log) From Template:Subst only: Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
Template:Infobox baseball biography (request) 2025-09-07 01:00 Template-protected (log) Modified by Courcelles on 2015-09-21: "Highly visible template"
Template:Strongbad (request) 2025-09-08 08:53 Template-protected (log) Modified by Edokter on 2014-05-04: ""
Module:College color (request) 2025-09-08 17:04 Template-protected (log) Protected by The Earwig on 2015-12-14: "High-risk Lua module: over 55,000 mainspace transclusions"
User:AmandaNP/UAA/Whitelist (request) 2025-09-10 17:06 Template-protected (log) Modified by AmandaNP on 2020-07-24: "Try Template editor per main blacklist page"
Template:Infobox animanga/Video (request) 2025-09-11 17:17 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
Template:Infobox dam (request) 2025-09-12 12:47 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2020-08-29: "High-risk template"
Template:Tree list/styles.css (request) 2025-09-14 00:34 Template-protected (log) Protected by Ymblanter on 2018-07-26: "Highly visible template: RFPP request"
Template:Infobox religious building (request) 2025-09-15 13:02 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Infobox company/styles.css (request) 2025-09-19 07:17 Template-protected (log) Protected by Izno on 2024-08-25: "Highly visible template, match parent"
Module:Archive list (request) 2025-09-19 09:34 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mr. Stradivarius on 2013-11-15: "High-risk Lua module: allow template editors"
Template:AfC submission/draft (request) 2025-09-19 18:42 Template-protected (log) From Template:AFC submission/draft: Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-17: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Module:College color/data (request) 2025-09-22 05:18 Template-protected (log) Modified by Galobtter on 2019-01-24: "High-risk Lua module"
Template:Country showdata (request) 2025-09-25 18:30 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Format linkr (request) 2025-10-02 16:28 Template-protected (log) Modified by Pppery on 2025-08-13: ""
Template:Tracked (request) 2025-10-02 21:38 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mr. Stradivarius on 2014-10-02: "Highly visible template: allow template editors"
Template:SPI case status/core (request) 2025-10-06 20:17 Template-protected (log) Modified by LFaraone on 2014-01-13: "Highly visible template"
Template:SPIstatusentry (request) 2025-10-06 20:17 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mr. Stradivarius on 2014-11-05: "Highly visible template: allow template editors"
Template:SPIstatusheader/styles.css (request) 2025-10-06 20:17 Template-protected (log) Modified by Pppery on 2025-04-12: "Template:SPI case status also uses this and is template-protected"
Module:Section link (request) 2025-10-07 21:49 Template-protected (log) Protected by Mr. Stradivarius on 2014-12-09: "High-risk Lua module"
Wikipedia:RedWarn/Default Warnings (request) 2025-10-11 06:08 Template-protected (log) Modified by Queen of Hearts on 2025-07-11: "Special:GoToComment/c-Sportzpikachu-20250711140400-Wikipedia:RedWarn/Default_Warnings"
Template:Merge done (request) 2025-10-11 08:21 Template-protected (log) Protected by Fish and karate on 2017-11-13: "Highly visible template"
Template:Infobox ancient site (request) 2025-10-13 09:59 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
Template:Infobox (request) 2025-10-14 19:52 Template-protected (log) Modified by Andrew Gray on 2017-02-15: "Degrade to template permission per request, in line with WP:PP"
Template:Album chart (request) 2025-10-18 02:45 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:WikiProject Fictional characters (request) 2025-10-19 13:30 Template-protected (log) Modified by Renamed user mou89p43twvqcvm8ut9w3 on 2016-11-08: "Highly visible template"
Template:Param value (request) 2025-10-20 09:19 Template-protected (log) Protected by MusikBot II on 2023-07-29: "High-risk template or module: 134494 transclusions (more info)"
Module:Gridiron color/data (request) 2025-10-20 10:36 Template-protected (log) Protected by CambridgeBayWeather on 2018-06-22: "Highly visible template"
Template:Requested move/dated (request) 2025-10-21 07:44 Template-protected (log) Modified by Oshwah on 2019-03-11: "Highly visible template"
Template:Period start (request) 2025-10-21 07:56 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mr. Stradivarius on 2014-06-11: "Highly visible template: allow template editors"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 19:58, 21 October 2025 (UTC)


WP:RFA

[edit]

RFA= Requests for adminship

WP:RFP

[edit]

RFP= Requests for permissions

Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Sswonk

[edit]

Permission was revoked at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&logid=169754554 . The permission was revoked four months ago before I recently returned after 14 years of absence from the project, please reinstate. Sswonk (talk) 15:03, 9 September 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days ([2]). — MusikBot talk 15:10, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
This RfC recently established that autopatrolled can be procedurally revoked from inactive contributors, but I don't think there was consensus that it could be procedurally reinstated upon request, so I would encourage the reviewing administrator (I'm not one) to consider this like any other request. @Sswonk: I had a couple of questions about the articles you recently created: what makes this website (on Loretta Lynn: Coal Miner's Daughter) and this website (on Honky Tonk Girl: My Life in Lyrics) reliable sources? Also, since IMDb is an unreliable source, is there another citation that could be used for the award on that first article? —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 16:10, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
Also, I forgot to say: welcome back to the project! I realized my comments above could come across as trying to shoot you down after your wikibreak, but I did mean it as genuine questions/feedback. :) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 16:20, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
Thanks TS69, I did not realize that you had posted here before I went to your talk, I am copy-pasting that here so we can continue the conversation in one place. Below is re: Jeff Burger, will respond on other questions momentarily.
I added a second citation to the first paragraph of Loretta Lynn: Coal Miner's Daughter. I think the first citation is fine, yes it is a self-published source by Jeff Burger however Burger is well-known (https://www.chicagoreviewpress.com/burger--jeff-contributor-301827.php) and the site serves as an archive of his previously published reviews. The page I cite is a reprint of a review first published in 1976, the publication is not specified, however the information about Burger suggests it satisfies "Self-published sources may be considered reliable when produced by an established subject-matter expert, whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable, independent publications." See also https://search.worldcat.org/search?q=au=%22Burger%2C%20Jeff%22 -- Burger should be considered reliable. Sswonk (talk) 16:34, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
Regarding the second question about Chapter 16, please see https://chapter16.org/about-us/ and https://www.humanitiestennessee.org/about/our-story/?cn-reloaded=1 publisher of the cited, archived website. I would also consider that as satisfying WP:V.
I did not realize IMDb was unreliable, I used that because it is the single source of the page 38th Golden Globe Awards. I added the actual Golden Globes as a source. Sswonk (talk) 17:01, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
Thanks for making those changes — your point about Burger makes sense to me, so I'll remove the {{sps?}} tag, and citing the Golden Globes' website for that award looks appropriate. I'm less sure about the reliability of Chapter 16, but I think I'll leave this for an administrator to weigh whether or not that would be a significant blocker to granting the permission. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 17:24, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
I appreciate that, thank you. Sswonk (talk) 18:20, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
The question remaining from TechnoSquirrel69 asks for administrator input on the reliability of the Chapter 16 web outlet of the Tennessee Humanities organization. Links are provided a couple of paragraphs above. I am noting here that this morning I changed the previously existing citation link on the Honky Tonk Girl: My Life in Lyrics page to a direct link rather than to the archived page, as I was able to find the current url for the review. The link TechnoSquirrel69 includes above in his initial post has been updated to a current page. So we are dealing with the WP:RS status of a current page on a site that supports a 51-year old Tennessee institution funded by the National Endowment for the Humanities. I think Chapter 16 is entirely reliable and should be used on Wikipedia articles related to Tennessee culture and history as needed. However, I want to thank TechnoSquirrel69 for diligence in finding areas for improvement in these stubs. Like him, I strive for the best references available and had determined the Chapter 16 and Jeff Burger sites were satisfactory prior to opening this request for permission; however I have been away for over a decade and am prepared to face challenges with humility. Fifteen years ago I worked on Led Zeppelin which was at the time poorly organized but since I left has been promoted to GA status. My opinion is that Loretta Lynn is on a similar level as a significant performer and figure in popular music history, and naturally I want articles about her and her work to have

top-shelf reviews; even stubs should strive for high quality, especially references within them, to help other editors find further material, to set a tone of sincerity and professionalism. Thank you again TechnoSquirrel69. Sswonk (talk) 14:17, 10 September 2025 (UTC)

What makes the Treaty of Southampton notable? voorts (talk/contributions) 21:56, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
@Sswonk voorts (talk/contributions) 22:19, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
@Voorts -- The notability rises from its mention in reliable sources as the first alliance between England and the Dutch Republic and as an initial policy forming act of Charles I. There was an existing maritime agreement, but the treaty went further and allied the two nations against Spain during a volatile period. To quote Anton Poot whose PhD thesis is one of the sources, "the maritime agreement had not mentioned Spain by name as the common enemy; the Treaty of Southampton left no doubt. It created an Anglo-Dutch partnership for a joint war against Spain, effectively meaning that England joined the Dutch in a war they had been waging already for decades." Charles was asserting England against Spain formally. The sources find it significant in the history of the Eighty Years War and of pre-civil war England. Sswonk (talk) 13:34, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
It seems like your ping didn't go through @Sswonk. Are there any sources other than the PhD dissertation that discuss the treaty in depth? voorts (talk/contributions) 01:11, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
@Voorts yes, odd about the ping. Well, as you can see in the article I posted about a month ago, I was able to identify the three sources plus the "further reading" thesis as verification for the information in the article at the time I posted it. I did not find much more, at least not that well sourced. The timing, the fact that the king did not stick by the Dutch, may make Southampton more obscure, and conceivably it might be well-challenged as not WP:RSed enough, but why? What I posted might be merged with an article that treated (pun?) the entirety of pre-civil war relations, something like that "further reading", don't know. I mean, I simply decided to write that stub article because it (the subject) is an entity that exists in history, that was mentioned in timelines, had a "redlink" where I first saw the treaty mentioned in Wikipedia, and that has sourced material about it. The entire treaty, albeit in French, is available to follow leads from. So I think it is worth posting a brief article about. This project is really a good jumping off point for people to explore and edit articles about obscure history topics. What is your opinion, Voorts, isn't what is sourced and the quality of those sources sufficient? And, shouldn't the topic be part of the encyclopedia? I have less than 8K edits in over four years of active editing, maybe I am missing something; I fell as though Treaty of Southampton fills a gap in coverage, without relying on original research. I understand WP:OWN and basically, whether obvious or not, I stepped away from editing the article the day I started it, hoping others might follow up, it isn't anything I claim to know a lot about other than those sources. But someone, or a few someones, might be able to expand the article to have more sources in a way I can't grasp this morning, and I hope that they do. Sswonk (talk) 13:52, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

User:QEnigma

[edit]

Hello, I am requesting Autopatrolled rights in order to reduce the backlog of articles awaiting review. I primarily create new articles on politics and law with a focus on biographies of notable individuals. I ensure that the content I add are verifiable and the articles comply with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. My previous request was declined in March 2025. Since then, I have strived to improve the quality of my contributions and have made substantial improvements to several existing ones, upgrading them to B-grade, e.g., [3], [4] and [5]. Regards. QEnigma 论 03:46, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

User:TheRichic

[edit]

Hello! I formally request the autopatrolled user right. I'm a regular user of Wikipedia, both in English and Spanish, and I consider that, after so many years and hundreds of articles created on both wikis, i am in the position to say that I know the rules and styles. I've never cared much about user rights, but now that I've started a personal project (ambassadors of Spain and all its lists) to expand diplomatic information about my country, Spain, I'd like to avoid the workload that comes with reviewing articles that comply with our rules. Thank you. TheRichic (Messages here) 11:12, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

@TheRichic: why is Francisco Javier Conde de Saro notable? voorts (talk/contributions) 01:20, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

User:ႧႤႧႰႨ ႾႠႰႨ

[edit]

Hello! I formally request the Autopatrolled user right. I'm a regular user of Wikipedia, both in Turkish and English. I have contributed to the Turkish Wikipedia, particularly on the Tao-Klarjeti region. I have also started to transfer these contributions to the English Wikipedia. I think it would be good to reduce the workload involved in reviewing the items I have written. Thank you. --ႧႤႧႰႨ ႾႠႰႨ (talk) 15:32, 15 October 2025 (UTC)

User:Aeternus

[edit]

I have been editing Wikipedia since 2006, have created numerous new articles, edited countless others, and am very familiar with its policies. Λeternus (talk) 12:46, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

User:Guylaen

[edit]

User regularly creates articles relating to military history, biographies, and the US. User has created over 200 articles. SnowyRiver28 (talk) 05:57, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

User:Michelangelo1992

[edit]

I've periodically patrolled Michelangelo1992's articles, and consistently found them to be in good shape. Focused on books as a topic area and very clear familiarity with WP:NBOOK. He's created 135 articles. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 22:56, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Requests for confirmation


Confirmed

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Rachel at Smart Warehousing

[edit]

Would like to upload company logo for an infobox. Rachel at Smart Warehousing (talk) 19:55, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

 Not done. The company logo can't be used while the article is in draftspace anyway, so don't worry about it for now. You will very likely be autoconfirmed by the time your draft is accepted. If not, you can ask again. -- asilvering (talk) 20:07, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Requests for page mover


Page mover

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Easternsahara

[edit]

I meet all of the Wikipedia:PMCRITERIA. I have never been blocked and I have never violated the 3RR. Otherwise, my history of contribution] has been fairly good, I have reviewed GAN, FLCS, and FACS, and currently have to FLCs running right now. I have 3,000 edits and my account hit the 6 month mark last month. As you can see, I have a history of moving things unopposed and contributing to Requested Moves, even in contentious topics where there are more things to take into consideration (I don't know how to link it, just go through my user contributions). I am also good at moving-adjacent things, like discussing changes on the talk page and I am familiar with redirects. In addition to moving things often, I am also a reviewer at AFC. Giving me this right will create less burden at WP:RMTR and will prevented other unopposed moves which I create discussions for. I will not use this right to bypass discussion, and have never used moving to bypass RM for topics which could be controversial. Thanks, 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 02:19, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

@Easternsahara "will prevented other unopposed moves which I create discussions for" – what would you check for before deciding that a move is sufficiently uncontroversial to be performed without discussion? Toadspike [Talk] 15:05, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
@Toadspike:, hey thanks for the quick response. Sorry for the bad grammar, I had created this when I was sleepy. By uncontroversial, I mean in violation of policies like disambiguation. Some examples that I have moved Talk:Israeli attack on Doha#Requested move 1 October 2025 (although this was in contentious topic, so maybe I'd put it in RM just in case), both Shah Abdul Wahhab which had unnesscary disambiguation of scholar (they were both scholars and the only Shah Abdul Wahhab's on wikipedia, John Quested (RAF officer) (RAF unneeded), Side A, Side B, Side X, Side Y (theological views), Route of the Franciscan Evangelisation in Guatemala, Akbar Aghayev (lieutenant), Jason "Human Kebab" Parsons, Smoke-free bathhouse (Vysotsky's song) etc. If it is not obviously the common name, or if the current article name does not directly fail any article-naming criteria, then it could be controversial (or if it does but is in a contentious topic). Thanks, 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 21:41, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
@Easternsahara How would you factor in previous moves or RMs when deciding whether a move could be controversial? Toadspike [Talk] 07:08, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Previous RMs go towards building consensus and I can not go against consensus even if I think my idea is good. Consensus if how Wikipedia works, and if I think my argument is good enough, I can create a new RM with my arguments. I should not use my Page mover powers to move it instead because that would be disrupting consensus. Thanks, 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 07:52, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Thanks. I will do some more looking around. In the meantime, please remember to do post-move cleanup. It looks like you forgot to de-bold "in Guatemala" after moving Route of the Franciscan Evangelisation. If you don't already, you should also try using User:Nardog/MoveHistory.js to check for past moves, which can sometimes indicate whether a move is controversial. Toadspike [Talk] 22:25, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
The candidate's two most recent RM/TR requests were contested. They have made six RM/TR requests total, which is not much of a burden. I don't feel ready to grant at this time. However, I will leave the final decision to another admin. Toadspike [Talk] 22:39, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
To the other admin(s), the first one was contested and then it got almost unanimously passed at RM and the latest one should just be Long Island, Madang Province per WP:NCDAB: "Comma-separated disambiguation. Ambiguous geographic names are often disambiguated by adding the name of a higher-level administrative division, separated by a comma, as in Windsor, Berkshire. See Naming conventions (geographic names)." Thanks, 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 16:07, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
The RMTR was contested by a different editor to the RM with very good rationale.[6] Moves which override RM consensus are controversial by default and this remains an convincing interpretation overall. CNC (talk) 18:01, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
I agree with you in that moves which override RMs are controversial, but note that people in the RM itself were proposing that 2025 be removed from the title as it is unnecessary (one could also argue that it is not neutral as it implies that bahrain let itself get attacked twice or that israel attacked bahrain twice). the only reason the moving admin didnt move it to not have the 2025 is because the people who voted at the beginning (and didn't change their vote after that) didn't notice that 2025 was not needed. The TR that i created also was not overriding the RM, the title was the same save for 2025. Thanks, 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 23:37, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
 Not done per Toadspike. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:28, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

User:JuniperChill

[edit]

I would like to renew my page mover rights seeing as it will expire this Sunday. Since having the right from late August, I have been working at WP:RM and done a lot of page moving. I have enacted several WP:RM/TR requests as well as closing RMs, much of which involved the tool. Seeing as I done a lot of work, and no issues on my talk page relating to page moves (since being granted the right) I hope to have the right granted indefinitely. JuniperChill (talk) 13:49, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary page mover rights by SilverLocust (expires 00:00, 26 October 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 13:50, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Requests for pending changes reviewer


Pending changes reviewer

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Inu06

[edit]

I'd like reviewer rights so I can help with pending changes and speed up the review process. Inu06 (talk) 07:19, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

User:Yerlo

[edit]

I have been reverting spam and vandalism on Special:RecentChanges, and I'd like pending changes reviewer to review pending edits as they show up there. Yerlo (talk) 14:53, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

User:Tactical Falcon

[edit]

I've been editing Wikipedia for about 7 months now, and made just under 500 edits. While sometimes I make mistakes, I learn from them and try to be as understanding as possible. I've merged one article, and recently split several. I think this permission would help me improve Wikipedia,and help take some pressure of other reviewers. Tactical Falcon (talk) 22:58, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

User:I am bad at usernames

[edit]

Looking to get pending changes reviewer in order to reduce the backlog. I've been editing for long enough to be familiar with policies. I am bad at usernames (talk | contribs) 01:00, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * it has begun... 21:20, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

User:PaulHSAndrews

[edit]

Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights

Requesting pending changes reviewer. I’ve been working in content areas with BLP/RS sensitivity and am comfortable checking for vandalism, BLP issues, and obvious policy problems. I’ll apply PCR as a quick sanity check, not a deep review.

A selection of articles created:

• Australian Naval Infrastructure Pty Ltd https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Diff/1317083245

• National Intermodal Corporation Limited https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Diff/1317083587

• National Housing Supply and Affordability Council https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Diff/1317084068

• Centre for Australia-India Relations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Diff/1317083813

• Financial Regulator Assessment Authority https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Diff/1317084307

• Offshore Infrastructure Registrar https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Diff/1317084530

• Administrator of the National Health Funding Pool https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Diff/1317084952

• Asbestos and Silica Safety and Eradication Council https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Diff/1317085146

• Defence Honours and Awards Appeals Tribunal https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Diff/1317087104

• Copyright Tribunal of Australia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Diff/1317086681

• Independent Parliamentary Expenses Authority https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Diff/1317084181

• Domestic, Family and Sexual Violence Commission https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Diff/1317085281

• Office of the Special Investigator https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Diff/1317085090

• Organ and Tissue Authority https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Diff/1317084920

• National Health Funding Body https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Diff/1317084752

• Office of the Inspector-General of Aged Care https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Diff/1317084541

• Professional Services Review https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Diff/1317085498

• Helen Rofe https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Diff/1317082184

• Elizabeth Cheeseman https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Diff/1317081695

• John Halley https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Diff/1317081328

• Kylie Downes https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Diff/1317081008

• John Snaden https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Diff/1317080062

• Dirk Boutkan https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Diff/1317491218

• Philip Durkin https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Diff/1317490813

• Guus Kroonen https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Diff/1317490555

• Evan Z. Macosko https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Diff/1317482053

• Allon M. Klein https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Diff/1317481404

• Christopher Legoe https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Diff/1317290611


}} PaulHSAndrews (talk) 19:37, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

 Not done. Please immediately cease using LLMs/AI to edit Wikipedia. -- asilvering (talk) 05:36, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

User:Seercat3160

[edit]

I already make a habit of keeping an eye on Special:PendingChanges when I'm spending time on Wikipedia, and it would be great to be able to accept edits that meet the requirements rather than just reverting those that don't, especially when the backlog fills up with acceptable edits waiting for a reviewer. If I could do with any constructive criticism, please let me know. Seercat3160 (talk) 10:09, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

User:HwyNerd Mike

[edit]

Hi! I have been recent change patrolling for quite awhile now, mostly reverting and warning users with Twinkle. The process of counter-vandal, though, does involve reviewing constructive or unconstructive edits on PC protected pages. I've created some articles, learned JavaScript (not the most important thing to say here, huh?), and have had good experience with countering vandalism and identifying edits.

As of the time I post this edit (including this edit), I will have 1,215 edits, 543 mainspace edits, and significantly expanded and created 3 articles. Any advice will be appreciated. HwyNerd Mike (tokk) 03:50, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * it has begun... 21:19, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
Requests for rollback


Rollback

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:HurricaneZeta

[edit]

Looking to renew my rollback rights indefinitely as they are expiring in a week HurricaneZeta (T) (C) 20:06, 15 October 2025 (UTC) HurricaneZeta (T) (C) 20:06, 15 October 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary rollback rights by Giraffer (expires 00:00, 22 October 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 20:10, 15 October 2025 (UTC)

User:CocaPopsRather

[edit]

I am requesting rollback permissions so I can explore and use other anti-vandalism tools such as Huggle, or antivandal- so I can be faster at reverting vandalism. CocaPopsRather 10:35, 16 October 2025 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * it has begun... 21:34, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

User:Ludus56

[edit]

I've been a long-time recent changes patroller, and having rollback permissions would improve my efficacy as a patroller. I almost always notify editors when I've reverted (even for obvious vandalism), and I have no history of edit warring. Ludus56 (talk) 22:31, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

User:SnowyRiver28

[edit]

I've been using RedWarn to patrol recent changes for over a month and I'd like to use tools like Huggle and AntiVandal to continue my patrolling. SnowyRiver28 (talk) 07:02, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([7]). — MusikBot talk 07:10, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
Apologies for my previous application. I read the requirements at Wikipedia:Rollback#Requesting rollback rights and assumed they'd be consistent with the requirements listed at the top of this page (which they aren't). I'll be more thorough in future! SnowyRiver28 (talk) 11:25, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
 Done * Pppery * it has begun... 21:24, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

User:Khagendrawiki

[edit]

I was suggested that i am on right track but reverting from only 2 week and need to gain some more experience [8].Hence Re-requesting this perm as i regularly patrol Special:AbuseLog and Special:RecentChanges to fight vandalism, and always leave msg on user's talk page after reverting their edits. Khagendra (talk) 14:45, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([9]). — MusikBot talk 15:00, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

User:Monkeysmashingkeyboards

[edit]

I'm getting back into patrolling recent changes, and I'd like to use AntiVandal(which I have used a couple years back) to allow me to patrol more efficiently. I've read all the reading material that HKLionel([10]) gave me, and I'm confident in my understanding of all the policies concerning vandalism and AGF. monkeysmashingkeyboards (talk) 16:07, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * it has begun... 21:22, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
Requests for template editor

Template editor

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:4TheWynne

[edit]

Hey there. I am a pretty frequent editor and creator of templates (especially navboxes – pretty stringent when it comes to formatting, etc.) and an experienced enough editor to know how to conduct myself when it comes to controversial changes, reverts, etc., but I am occasionally faced with protected templates (e.g. {{Infobox AFL biography}}, {{Infobox musical artist}}, {{Colored link}}) and would love to be able to very carefully edit them; this is something that I've considered for a while, and not because of any one template. I promise not to abuse this privilege if granted; thank you – regards, 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 15:37, 16 October 2025 (UTC)

Standard Guidelines review:
  1. Green tickY (guideline: >1 year, applicant: 11)
  2. Green tickY (guideline: >1000 edits, applicant: 54k)
  3. Green tickY (guideline: >150 template edits, applicant: ~2600)
  4. Green tickY (guideline: !<6 months, applicant: NA)
  5. Red XN (guideline: 3 sandboxes, applicant: 1)
  6. Red XN (guideline: 5 requests, applicant: 1 (reverted))
Primefac (talk) 19:39, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
@4TheWynne Please review WP:TPEGRANT. Have you worked on at least three sandboxes of template-protected templates or modules? Have your requested and had enacted at least five significant edits to template-protected templates or modules? --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 17:14, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
Hmmm. Are you requesting this permission only to revert this edit to Template:Colored link? sapphaline (talk) 18:15, 16 October 2025 (UTC)

but I am occasionally faced with protected templates (e.g. {{Infobox AFL biography}}, {{Infobox musical artist}}, {{Colored link}}) and would love to be able to very carefully edit them

What do you plan to improve for these templates? sapphaline (talk) 18:23, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
 Not done per Primefac. If you were close to the criteria I might be willing to make an exception, but one edit request and one sandbox doesn't suffice. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:35, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Footer

[edit]

Policies and links

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Admin_dashboard/light&oldid=1277922312"