Extinction and recovery patterns of the vegetation across the Cretaceous–Palaeogene boundary — a tool for unravelling the causes of the end-Permian mass-extinction

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2005.09.007Get rights and content

Abstract

High-resolution palynofloral signatures through the Cretaceous–Palaeogene boundary succession show several features in common with the Permian–Triassic transition but there are also important differences. Southern Hemisphere Cretaceous–Palaeogene successions, to date studied at high resolution only in New Zealand, reveal a diverse palynoflora abruptly replaced by fungi-dominated assemblages that are in turn succeeded by low diversity suites dominated by fern spores, then gymnosperm- and angiosperm-dominated palynofloras of equivalent diversity to those of the Late Cretaceous. This palynofloral signature is interpreted to represent instantaneous (days to months) destruction of diverse forest communities associated with the Chicxulub impact event. The pattern of palynofloral change suggests wholesale collapse of vascular plant communities and short-term proliferation of saprotrophs followed by relatively rapid successional recovery of pteridophyte and seed–plant communities. The Permian–Triassic transition records global devastation of gymnosperm-dominated forests in a short zone synchronous with one or more peaks of the fungal/algal palynomorph Reduviasporonites. This zone is typically succeeded by assemblages rich in lycophyte spores and/or acritarchs. Higher in the succession, these assemblages give way to diverse palynofloras dominated by new groups of gymnosperms. Although different plant families were involved in the mass-extinctions, the general pattern of extinction and recovery is consistent between both events. The major difference is the longer duration for each phase of the Triassic recovery vegetation compared to that of the Paleocene. The protracted extinction-recovery succession at the Permian–Triassic boundary is incompatible with an instantaneous causal mechanism such as an impact of a celestial body but is consistent with hypotheses invoking extended environmental perturbations through flood-basalt volcanism and release of methane from continental shelf sediments.

Introduction

The evolution of life on Earth has been interrupted by mass-extinction events at least five times. Of the major extinction events identified in the geological record, the Cretaceous–Palaeogene (K–Pg) extinction event (65 Ma) has been investigated most extensively and the impact of a celestial body is widely recognized as the primary cause for this biological crisis, which extinguished about 75% of species (Alvarez et al., 1980). However, this crisis was dwarfed by the largest of all mass-extinctions, the so-called Permian–Triassic event (251 Ma), which witnessed the loss of up to 95% of species according to reverse rarefaction analysis (Raup, 1979).
Both events record massive devastation of animal and plant communities. We compare the turnover and recovery of the vegetation between the two events by analysis of the dispersed spore–pollen record. There is now general agreement on an impact-related mechanism for mass-extinction at the Cretaceous–Palaeogene boundary (Alvarez et al., 1980). Our approach is to compare the broad composition of palynomorph assemblages at successive intervals through the well-studied Cretaceous–Palaeogene transition to provide clues to decode the causes of the less-studied and more enigmatic Permian–Triassic (P–Tr) mass-extinction and the influences on subsequent phases of vegetation recovery.

Section snippets

Material and methods

Our study principally utilizes palynological records from high latitude Southern Hemisphere (southeast Gondwana) terrestrial sequences for both the Permian–Triassic and Cretaceous–Palaeogene events. This minimizes the palaeonvironmental/palaeoclimatic differences between the compared successions as southeastern Gondwana was consistently located in high southern latitudes from Late Carboniferous to Palaeogene times (Veevers, 1984). Additionally, most studies of these extinction events have

Cretaceous–Palaeogene event

Late Cretaceous global palynofloras are divided into three major floristic provinces (Herngreen et al., 1998): (1) The Northern Hemisphere Province incorporating the Aquillapollenites, Normapolles and Schizaeoisporites Subprovinces, (2) The Equatorial Palmae Province, and (3) The Austral Nothofagidites/Proteacidites Province. During the latest Cretaceous, New Zealand (together with Australia and Antarctica) was part of the Austral floristic region characterized by Phyllocladidites mawsonii,

Summary of floristic trends across the mass-extinction events

Vegetation was disrupted globally at the Cretaceous–Palaeogene boundary but there were significant regional differences in floristic turnover. Whereas southern high latitude floras reveal a mass-kill of vegetation evidenced by dramatic but short-term changes in the relative abundance of plant groups (Vajda et al., 2001, Vajda and Raine, 2003, Vajda and McLoughlin, 2004) most North American sections indicate both massive devastation and mass-extinction of plants at the Cretaceous–Palaeogene

Discussion and conclusions

The similar signals in the palynological record point to a congruous pattern of vegetation turnover and recovery for the Cretaceous–Palaeogene and Permian–Triassic extinctions. Although this might be used to argue that both turnovers represent impact-related events, the palynofloras appear to reflect a general pattern of successional vegetation recovery manifest after any major environmental disruption as described by Mueller-Dombois (2000) from recovery successions on Hawaii. Causal models for

Acknowledgements

Valuable criticism of this manuscript by the reviewers David Cantrill and Stefan Piasecki is much appreciated. Dr. Ian Raine (IGNS) is acknowledged for sharing his great expertise in New Zealand palynology. This research was supported by the Swedish Research Council, the Crafoord Foundation #20051023, Carl Tryggers Foundation and the Swedish Wennergren Foundation to V. Vajda and by an Australian Research Council Discovery Grant (DP0557828) and an Australian Academy of Science, Scientific Visits

References (84)

  • N. Nagalingum et al.

    Patterns of fern diversification in the Cretaceous of Australia

    Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol.

    (2002)
  • D.J. Nichols et al.

    A new Cretaceous–Tertiary boundary locality in the western Powder River Basin, Wyoming: biological and geological implications

    Cretac. Res.

    (1992)
  • M.B. Steiner et al.

    Fungal abundance spike and the Permian–Triassic boundary in the Karoo Supergroup (South Africa)

    Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol.

    (2003)
  • S.A. Afonin et al.

    A bloom of Tympanicysta Balme (green algae of zygnematalean affinities) at the Permian–Triassic boundary

    Geodiversitas

    (2001)
  • L.W. Alvarez et al.

    Extraterrestrial cause for the Cretaceous Tertiary extinction

    Science

    (1980)
  • J.M. Anderson et al.

    Palaeoflora of southern Africa

    Prodromus of South African megafloras Devonian to Lower Cretaceous

    (1985)
  • J.M. Anderson et al.

    Heyday of the gymnosperms: systematics and biodiversity of the Late Triassic Molteno fructifications

  • R.A. Askin et al.

    Palynological change across the Cretaceous–Tertiary boundary, Seymour Island, Antarctica: environment and depositional factors

  • B.E. Balme

    Plant microfossils from the Lower Triassic of Western Australia

    Palaeontology

    (1963)
  • B.E. Balme

    Palynology of Permian and Triassic strata in the Salt Range and Surghar Range, West Pakistan

  • B.E. Balme

    Fossil in situ spores and pollen grains: an annotated catalogue

    Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol

    (1995)
  • B.E. Balme et al.

    Floral modifications at the Permian–Triassic boundary in Australia

  • A.R. Basu et al.

    Chondritic meteorite fragments associated with the Permian–Triassic boundary in Antarctica

    Science

    (2003)
  • L. Becker et al.

    Bedout: a possible end-Permian impact crater offshore of northwestern Australia

    Science

    (2004)
  • H. Brinkhuis et al.

    Palynology of the Geulhemmerberg Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary section (Limburg, SE Netherlands)

    Geol. Mijnb.

    (1996)
  • R.R. Brooks et al.

    Stratigraphic occurrences of iridium anomalies at four Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary sites in New Zealand

    Geology

    (1986)
  • M.J. de Wit et al.

    Multiple organic carbon isotope reversals across the Permo-Triassic boundary of terrestrial Gondwana sequences; clues to extinction patterns and delayed ecosystem recovery

    J. Geol.

    (2002)
  • M.E. Dettmann

    Cretaceous vegetation: the microfossil record

  • W.A. DiMichele et al.

    Tropical floras of the Late Pennsylvanian–Early Permian transition; Carrizo Arroyo in context

    Bull. New Mexico Mus. Nat. Hist. Sci.

    (2004)
  • Y. Eshet et al.

    Fungal event and palynological record of ecological crisis and recovery across the Permian–Triassic boundary

    Geology

    (1995)
  • R.F. Fleming

    Palynological observations of the Cretaceous–Tertiary boundary in the Raton Formation, New Mexico

    Palynology

    (1985)
  • Foster, C.B., 1979. Permian plant microfossils of the Blair Athol Coal Measures, Baralaba Coal Measures, and basal...
  • C.B. Foster et al.

    The Permian–Triassic boundary in Australia; where is it and how is it expressed?

    Proc. R. Soc. Vic.

    (1998)
  • C.B. Foster et al.

    A revision of Reduviasporonites Wilson 1962; description, illustration, comparison and biological affinities

    Palynology

    (2002)
  • R. Helby

    Review of Late Permian and Triassic palynology of New South Wales

    Spec. Publ. - Geol. Soc. Aust.

    (1973)
  • R.J. Helby et al.

    Cyclostrobus gen. nov., cones of lycopsidean plants from the Narrabeen Group (Triassic) of New South Wales

    Aust. J. Bot.

    (1965)
  • R. Helby et al.

    A palynological zonation of the Australian Mesozoic

    Assoc. Australas. Palaeontols Mem.

    (1987)
  • G.F.W. Herngreen et al.

    Biostratigraphy of Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary strata in the Curfs Quarry, the Netherlands

  • W.B.K. Holmes

    The Middle Triassic flora from Benolong near Dubbo, central-western New South Wales

    Alcheringa

    (1982)
  • C.L. Hotton

    Palynology of the Cretaceous–Tertiary boundary in central Montana; evidence for extraterrestrial impact as a cause of the terminal Cretaceous extinctions

    Spec. Pap. - Geol. Soc. Am.

    (2002)
  • D. Jablonski

    Causes and consequences of mass extinction: a comparative approach

  • Xiaochi Jin et al.

    Pattern of mass extinction near the Permian–Triassic boundary in South China

    Science

    (2000)
  • Cited by (89)

    • End-Permian (252 Mya) deforestation, wildfires and flooding—An ancient biotic crisis with lessons for the present

      2020, Earth and Planetary Science Letters
      Citation Excerpt :

      Losses of marine animal species during the EPE have been estimated at 80–96% (Stanley, 2016) and some authors argue that the extinction in the oceans was coeval with that on land (Payne and Clapham, 2012), whereas others have presented evidence of extinction on land preceding that in the oceans (Fielding et al., 2019; Mays et al., in press). The EPE in southern high-latitude non-marine successions has long been associated with the disappearance of broad-leafed deciduous forests dominated by glossopterid gymnosperms (Helby, 1970; Foster, 1979; Vajda and McLoughlin, 2007; McLoughlin, 2011; Van de Wetering et al., 2013a, 2013b). Glossopterids supplied nutrition and living space for diverse networks of vertebrates, invertebrates and micro-organisms (Slater et al., 2015) and were the prime contributors of biomass to the vast Permian coal deposits of Gondwana, hence their disappearance had major implications for ecosystem structure.

    • Plants and the K-T Boundary

      2008, Plants and the K T Boundary
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text