Agree & Join LinkedIn

By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.

Sign in to view more content

Create your free account or sign in to continue your search

Welcome back

Forgot password?

or

By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.

New to LinkedIn? Join now

or

New to LinkedIn? Join now

By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.

LinkedIn

LinkedIn is better on the app

Don’t have the app? Get it in the Microsoft Store.

Open the app
Skip to main content
LinkedIn
  • Top Content
  • People
  • Learning
  • Jobs
  • Games
  • Get the app
Join now Sign in
  1. All
  2. Application Architecture

Your agile team is divided on feature requests. How do you navigate conflicting priorities?

When your agile team is divided on feature requests, balancing everyone's priorities can be challenging. Here's how you can navigate these conflicting priorities:

  • Hold a prioritization meeting: Facilitate a session where team members can discuss and rank the importance of each feature.

  • Use data-driven decisions: Base your choices on user feedback, analytics, and business value to ensure impartiality.

  • Implement a voting system: Allow the team to vote on features, ensuring that the decision reflects the collective opinion.

How do you handle conflicting priorities in your agile team?

Application Development Application Development

Application Development

+ Follow
  1. All
  2. Application Architecture

Your agile team is divided on feature requests. How do you navigate conflicting priorities?

When your agile team is divided on feature requests, balancing everyone's priorities can be challenging. Here's how you can navigate these conflicting priorities:

  • Hold a prioritization meeting: Facilitate a session where team members can discuss and rank the importance of each feature.

  • Use data-driven decisions: Base your choices on user feedback, analytics, and business value to ensure impartiality.

  • Implement a voting system: Allow the team to vote on features, ensuring that the decision reflects the collective opinion.

How do you handle conflicting priorities in your agile team?

Add your perspective
Help others by sharing more (125 characters min.)
9 answers
  • Contributor profile photo
    Contributor profile photo
    Nadeem Malik

    Enterprise Architect - providing enterprise-wide insights, promoting standardization, reducing costs, mitigating risk, increasing agility, realizing strategies, and driving innovation.

    • Report contribution

    Looking at this through an architectural lens, effective prioritization requires a multi-layered approach. Try combining WSJF (Weighted Shortest Job First) scoring with capability heat mapping - it's like having both traffic lights and GPS for your feature roadmap! Don't forget to establish clear governance patterns upfront; tools like modified Delphi technique can help prevent "loudest voice wins" scenarios. Key is creating visual decision frameworks that connect business capabilities to features, making trade-offs transparent. Remember, good architecture isn't about perfect solutions, but about managing trade-offs effectively! 🎯

    Like
    3
  • Contributor profile photo
    Contributor profile photo
    Ashiqul Islam

    Media, Home Solutions & GTM Team Leader 14 years in the Consumer Electronics Industry

    • Report contribution

    1. Arrange a survey among office employee and existing customers for their opinion 2. Find the common grounds first so can set priorities of feature based on it 3. Calculate feature ROI as some feature may seem attractive but implementation will impact bottom line

    Like
    3
  • Contributor profile photo
    Contributor profile photo
    leela kumili

    Solution Enabler| Engineering Specialist

    • Report contribution

    To navigate conflicting feature priorities in an agile team, I focus on communication and collaboration. I gather input from stakeholders to understand the business value and complexity of each feature, using factors like ROI and urgency to prioritize. During sprint planning, I facilitate open discussions to ensure transparency. If conflicts persist, I align decisions with the product roadmap and prioritize features delivering the most value. For example, I prioritized a performance fix over an enhancement to ensure immediate impact, scheduling the enhancement for the next sprint. This approach ensures alignment and user satisfaction.

    Like
    1
  • Contributor profile photo
    Contributor profile photo
    Mohammad Alam

    Strategic Business Process Lead | Financial & Operational Excellence | Digital Transformation | Lean Six Sigma Black Belt | Empowering Data-Driven Growth

    • Report contribution

    To effectively prioritize we may hold workshops to discuss factors such as user value, business impact, technical feasibility, and dependencies. These collaborative sessions encourage open communication techniques like the MoSCoW method to reach a consensus. In addition to collaborative decision-making, we can also rely on data-driven insights by tools like heatmaps, hypothesis testing, and user surveys help us understand user preferences and the long-term implications of feature implementation. We can also utilize agile estimation and planning techniques like story points or sizing exercise. By effectively prioritizing and managing our workload, we can ensure that team delivers value to our customers and stakeholders.

    Like
    1
  • Contributor profile photo
    Contributor profile photo
    David G. Moore, Jr., PhD, MBA, PMP, CSDP, NREMT

    Lead Software Architect @ HHS/CMS | Chief Technology Officer @ Restoring Pride | PhD, Computer Science | MBA, IT Management

    • Report contribution

    This one's easy: the highest priority customer's stuff gets done first. In my case, that'd be the POTUS, the Secretary of HHS, Director of CMS, and on down. If you've got two customers of coequal priority both calling for something different, then you go to the person one step above them and ask him or her to make the call. #problemsolved

    Like
    1
View more answers
Application Development Application Development

Application Development

+ Follow

Rate this article

We created this article with the help of AI. What do you think of it?
It’s great It’s not so great

Thanks for your feedback

Your feedback is private. Like or react to bring the conversation to your network.

Tell us more

Report this article

More articles on Application Development

No more previous content
  • You're integrating new technologies into an application. How can you avoid causing downtime?

  • Your client keeps adding new features to the app. How do you maintain its quality without scope creep?

  • Your high-traffic app needs new features and better performance. Can you achieve both?

  • Your high-traffic app needs new features and better performance. Can you achieve both?

No more next content
See all

More relevant reading

  • Agile Methodologies
    What is the most effective way to prioritize user stories based on estimated effort?
  • Agile Methodologies
    What are the best ways to overcome user story blockers?
  • Agile Methodologies
    What are the best ways to identify and address impediments during a sprint?
  • Agile Methodologies
    How do you handle feedback on user stories that is too early or too late?

Are you sure you want to delete your contribution?

Are you sure you want to delete your reply?

  • LinkedIn © 2025
  • About
  • Accessibility
  • User Agreement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Copyright Policy
  • Brand Policy
  • Guest Controls
  • Community Guidelines
Like
1
9 Contributions