Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Perspective Chapter: AI-Driven Production Sequencing in the Era of Industry 4.0 and 5.0 – From Theory to Smart Manufacturing

Written By

Fatmir Azemi, Faruk Ahmeti

Submitted: 14 August 2025 Reviewed: 25 August 2025 Published: 01 December 2025

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.1012630

Chapter metrics overview

94 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

This chapter presents the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in optimising production sequencing in the age of Industry 4.0 and 5.0, focusing on the Launch Sequence of Job (LSJ) model. Industry 4.0 has brought advanced automation and process interconnection through recent developments, especially in information technology such as the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) and real-time data analytics, while Industry 5.0 emphasizes human–machine collaboration, resilience, and sustainability. The mathematical model created integrates three main factors – customer priority, product complexity, and resource availability – to create a flexible and efficient production plan. This chapter also presents the possibilities of connecting the created model to models that assist in decision-making and optimisation. The model implements a weighted scoring system to assess the importance of each order, taking into account factors such as delivery times, financial contribution, and technological requirements. Industrial applications have shown tangible benefits, including reduced process changeover times, fewer delays for urgent orders, and optimized energy consumption. Beyond operational efficiency, the chapter addresses sustainability aspects, such as waste reduction, supply chain optimisation, and lowering the carbon footprint. Real case studies from companies like Siemens, BMW, and Bosch demonstrate significant improvements achieved through AI applications. The chapter also discusses technical, organizational, and ethical challenges in AI implementation, providing recommendations for both industry and scientific research. Ultimately, LSJ is presented as a powerful tool for enhancing flexibility, sustainability, and organizational resilience in increasingly dynamic manufacturing environments.

Keywords

  • artificial intelligence
  • Industry 4.0 and 5.0
  • production sequencing
  • launching sequence of jobs
  • sustainable manufacturing
  • resource optimisation
  • smart manufacturing

1. Introduction

Artificial intelligence (AI) is one of the most impactful technologies of the twenty-first century, bringing fundamental changes to how manufacturing enterprises plan, monitor, and optimise their processes. It has significantly changed the operations of various industries [1].

AI has transformed from being just a theoretical idea into a practical tool that helps factories operate more efficiently and swiftly. By combining machine learning (ML), big data, and robotics, production can become smarter and more flexible. Industry 4.0 represents this kind of technological revolution, connecting the physical world with the digital world. It utilizes connected systems, smart sensors, and real-time data to create intelligent factories that can quickly adapt their processes when market needs change [2]. In this system, AI functions as the “brain,” collecting information, analysing it, and assisting in making decisions rapidly.

Industry 5.0 is currently under development and is beginning to be adopted in practice. It focuses more on humans and machines working together, putting people at the center of production. This way, products can be more personalized, and production can also be more sustainable and resilient. Industry 5.0 is increasingly combining technological improvements with human values, linking digital innovation with social and human concerns [3].

When it comes to job sequencing, AI plays a very important role, especially in the launch sequence of jobs (LSJ). The idea is to create production plans that are efficient and flexible, complete customer orders on time, handle complex products, and utilize resources in the best way to fulfill the needs of Industry 5.0.

1.1 AI in manufacturing: Basic principles

AI is about creating systems that can learn, reason, see patterns, and make decisions. These abilities grow together with computer science and engineering development [4]. In manufacturing, AI helps automate processes, improve efficiency, and predict maintenance before any problems happen.

Some main AI technologies in manufacturing are:

  • Machine learning (ML): Uses past data to make predictions and support decisions.

  • Deep learning (DL): Uses multi-layer neural networks to process images, signals, and control complex systems.

  • Natural language processing (NLP): Extract useful information from manuals, maintenance logs, or customer feedback.

  • Computer vision (CV): Helps automate the inspection of products and supports robots in collaborative tasks.

These technologies also work together with the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT), cyber–physical systems (CPS), and big data analytics, which allow companies to monitor and optimise production constantly [5].

2. LSJ model

2.1 Model description

The LSJ model is an advanced method for scheduling production task initiation in dynamic demand environments. It integrates three main factors:

  1. Customer priority – the importance and urgency of orders based on agreements and deadlines.

  2. Product complexity – duration and resources required for production.

  3. Resource availability – status of machines, equipment, and materials.

The LSJ is determined based on the significance of each customer order. This model calculates the significance value for each job that enters the production process and then arranges a sequence for launching products accordingly. In this scenario, each customer order represents a single job, consisting of a set of products with multiple operations. The number of machines is denoted by “m,” and the number of jobs by “n.” Typically, the subscript “i” denotes a job, while the subscript “j” refers to a machine. If a job requires multiple processing steps or operations, the pair (i, j) represents the specific step or operation of job “i” on machine “j.”

The problem can be described as follows: There exists a set of customer orders, {1, …, n}; these orders have been identified as jobs. For example, the first customer order will be Job1, the second customer order will be Job2, and so forth. Each order n consists of a set of products p with a set of operations o. The scheduling challenge is to determine the optimal LSJ by considering the value and significance of each customer order.

To address this, the model incorporates parameters related to business objectives, customer needs, and environmental conditions across the enterprise. These parameters are grouped into four main categories (or levels) that together influence the launch decision:

  • Customer order significance (COS): urgency, importance, and profitability of the order.

  • Product significance (PS): complexity, demand level, and value of products.

  • Material significance (MS): availability and criticality of materials.

  • Technological process significance (TPS): setup time, process stability, and machine requirements.

Overall, these factors define the LSJ model, which is represented by the following expression:

LSJ = f{COS, PS, MS, TPS}

In other words, the LSJ model prioritizes jobs by simultaneously evaluating customer priorities, product importance, material constraints, and technological requirements. The detailed mathematical formulation provided in the following subsections expands each of these four components into quantifiable sub-parameters.

While the mathematical formulation provides a rigorous representation of the LSJ model, the core logic can be summarized in simple terms. The LSJ evaluates each job according to several weighted criteria, such as customer importance, due date, technological setup time, and profitability. The resulting score determines the priority order. In practice, this means that high-value or urgent jobs are launched earlier, while low-impact or less time-sensitive jobs are delayed. The mathematical model formalizes this logic, but the intuition is that LSJ balances both operational efficiency and strategic business priorities.

According to our model created [6], the proposed model for launching sequences is as follows:

LSJi=0.190CRi+0.095QDPi+0.047NBRi+0.095CPRi++0.095FCi+0.238DDi+0.238EPi+PCi+PTi+RQi++p=1ppl=1ll(ARNMipl+CSORipl)+p=1ppl=1llo=1oo(NTOiplo+ATPiplo+CAiplo)eqn1

where:

Indices

i =1, 2, 3,…, n; i – customer order (jobs),

p =1, 2, 3, … pp; p – number of products,

o =1, 2, 3, …, oo; o – number of operations,

l =1, 2, 3, …, ll; l – number of parts.

Parameters

  • x1, x2, …, x7 – weighting factors determined through a digital logic model.

2.2 Operating mechanism

The LSJ model that is created can use real-time data from sensors and IIoT systems to update the job list. This integrated approach lets the system adapt dynamically to changing data, optimize maintenance planning, and reduce unplanned downtime. By combining it with reinforcement learning algorithms, the system can learn from past results and keep improving the job sequencing over time.

2.3 Impact on human roles

Contrary to fears of full worker replacement, LSJ places workers in new roles:

  • Smart supervisors who monitor and adjust scheduling as needed.

  • Strategic decision-makers who use data to optimize long-term processes.

  • Collaborators with AI, combining practical experience with fast analyses from intelligent systems.

Practical example:

From a practical perspective, the model has been tested with data from a material processing company. Compared to other sequencing models, it turns out that this model is among the models that give the best results, and in special cases, when specific data of different natures must be obtained, it gives very good results. It should be noted that the model is not fully integrated with AI. Currently, some components, such as reinforcement learning for dynamic rescheduling, predictive maintenance inputs, and quality control feedback, are AI-driven. However, other aspects, including the initial weighting of criteria and final overrides, remain rule-based or rely on expert judgment. This hybrid structure reflects the current maturity of AI in manufacturing: while algorithms provide adaptability and real-time responsiveness, human supervision and rule-based logic ensure reliability and acceptance on the shop floor. The integration of the model with AI algorithms significantly affects the reduction of process changeover times and delays of urgent orders, thanks to the calculation of priority in real time.

3. Applications of AI in manufacturing

The integration of AI in manufacturing has fundamentally transformed the management and control of processes, facilitating resource optimisation, dynamic production planning, predictive maintenance, and advanced quality control. These applications not only boost production efficiency and quality but also strengthen sustainability and the ability to respond to sudden demand changes [7].

3.1 Predictive and preventive maintenance

One of the most widespread AI applications in manufacturing is predictive maintenance, where machine sensors collect data on temperature, vibration, noise, and other operational parameters. ML algorithms analyse this data to predict faults before they occur, avoiding unplanned downtime [8].

Practical example:

Siemens uses a system called Sinalytics, which collects and analyses real-time data from industrial equipment, reducing maintenance costs by up to 30% and increasing machine uptime.

3.2 Production process optimisation

AI can analyse data from all production phases and suggest changes to optimize operation sequencing, reducing cycle time and material waste [9].

This is closely related to the LSJ model, which makes real-time decisions on the optimal production order.

Real example:

Toyota implemented an AI system to optimize assembly line scheduling, using historical and real-time data to minimize wait times between stations.

3.3 Quality control with CV

CV technologies, empowered by deep neural networks, can identify product defects with an accuracy often surpassing human visual inspection [10].

CV is a branch of AI that allows computers and systems to extract meaningful information from digital images or photos, videos, and other visual data – and then act on or make recommendations based on that information [11]. Furthermore, CV uses a large amount of data to perform analysis that leads to the distinction and subsequent recognition of images. To do this, CV uses one of the most effective types of ML algorithms, which is DL; more specifically, convolutional neural networks (CNNs). However, machine vision (MV) is a subset of CV, which refers to the study of methods and techniques by which artificial vision systems can be built and used usefully in practical applications. The introduction of MV in industrial processes is usually driven by the need to lower costs by improving efficiency (and, in turn, productivity), reduce errors (and improve quality), or collect more data. Just as important, it can also replace missing skilled workers or free employees from dangerous, hard, or tiring tasks in industry. This greatly increases quality consistency and reduces the number of returned products.

Real example:

General electric uses CV to inspect aircraft engine parts, achieving defect detection accuracy of over 99%.

3.4 Practical python code for sequencing optimisation

Below is a simplified Python example that uses a basic genetic algorithm to optimize production sequencing based on completion time and order priority.

import random

# Job list: (name, completion_time, priority)

jobs = [

(“Job_A”, 5, 3),

(“Job_B”, 8, 2),

(“Job_C”, 3, 5),

(“Job_D”, 6, 4)

]

# Fitness calculation function for a sequence

def calculate_fitness(sequence):

total_time = 0

total_score = 0

for job in sequence:

total_time+ = job[1]

total_score+ = job[2] * (1/total_time)

return total_score

# Creating initial population

population = [random.sample(jobs, len(jobs)) for _ in range(10)]

# Iterations for optimisation

for iteration in range(100):

# Sort by fitness

population.sort(key = lambda x: calculate_fitness(x), reverse = True)

# Select the best and generate a new generation

best = population[:5]

offspring = []

for parent in best:

copy_seq = parent[:]

random.shuffle(copy_seq)

offspring.append(copy_seq)

population = best + offspring

# Optimal result

population.sort(key = lambda x: calculate_fitness(x), reverse = True)

print(“Best sequence:”, population[0])

Explanation:

  • Each job has a completion time and a particular priority.

  • The genetic algorithm seeks a solution to achieve the best priority/time ratio.

  • This is a basic illustration. In practical scenarios, data from the IIoT, as well as more sophisticated analytics, would be incorporated.

3.5 Sustainability features in AI-driven manufacturing

Sustainability is a very important and critical factor in Industry 5.0. Sustainability requires a balance between economic value and environmental and social value [12]. AI in job sequencing and production management develops a lower-cost model by cutting down energy costs, reducing waste, and enabling the optimal use of natural resources.

3.6 Energy consumption optimisation

According to Zhang et al., real-time monitoring of the work [13] adjusts machine operating hours or production schedules to off-peak hours by using AI, which reduces waste and can suggest modifications to decrease it.

For example:

Through the EcoStruxure AI platform, Schneider Electric automates the monitoring and optimisation of factory energy use, enabling savings of 20% on total annual energy bill expenditures.

3.7 Minimizing waste and unusable materials

AI technology plays a significant role in analyzing processes by identifying critical areas of waste and providing recommendations to tweak the designs or production parameters to minimize waste. This is particularly useful in additive manufacturing (three-dimensional [3D] printing) technologies, where AI-driven topological optimisation techniques can greatly decrease the amount of material used [14].

Practical example:

Siemens energy utilizes topological optimisation in its algorithms to enhance 3D-printed turbine components, achieving a 40% improvement in weight and material efficiency while also prolonging the life of the components.

3.8 Supply chain optimisation for sustainability

AI can analyse supply routes and select options that minimize CO2 emissions, as well as predict delays to avoid urgent transport with high environmental impact [15].

Real example:

Unilever implemented AI systems to optimize distribution routes, reducing vehicle mileage by 15% and significantly lowering greenhouse gas emissions.

Link to LSJ Model

The LSJ model can integrate sustainability indicators into its decision-making algorithm, balancing production priorities with environmental goals. For example, a low-priority job with very high energy consumption could be scheduled during off-peak energy tariff periods, reducing costs and environmental impact.

4. Organizational resilience in AI-driven manufacturing

Organizational resilience refers to an organization’s ability to quickly adapt and maintain operational continuity when facing challenges such as equipment failures, supply delays, sudden demand changes, or global crises [16]. In modern manufacturing environments, AI provides the necessary tools to strengthen this adaptive capacity.

4.1 Predicting supply chain disruptions

AI-driven predictive models allow companies to identify potential supply chain risks before they cause real problems [16]. AI combines data from suppliers, transporters, and markets to detect early signs of shortages or delays.

Real example:

IBM Watson Supply Chain uses AI algorithms to monitor global events, such as natural disasters or trade conflicts, alerting companies to take alternative measures.

4.2 Dynamic adaptation of production planning

AI can reconfigure production plans in real time to adapt to demand changes or resource shortages. Integrating this approach with the LSJ model allows for the immediate selection of the optimal job sequence based on the current situation.

Real example:

During the COVID-19 pandemic, Bosch used AI systems to dynamically change production priorities, focusing on high-demand items and minimizing line changeover times.

4.3 The role of employees in resilience

Industry 5.0 emphasizes the human role as an essential part of the production ecosystem. AI does not replace workers but empowers them with data-driven information, enabling faster and more accurate decisions in unforeseen situations [17].

In this context, employees act as:

  • Coordinators between intelligent systems and practical operations.

  • Decision-makers for crisis response strategies.

  • Innovators in adapting work processes.

4.4 Link to long-term performance

Building a sustainable and crisis-resilient production system not only reduces short-term losses but also enhances brand reliability and ensures competitiveness in the global market. AI, combined with the LSJ approach, acts as a catalyst for this long-term performance.

5. Real case studies in AI-driven production sequencing

Using AI in production planning and sequencing is no longer an experimental concept but a widely adopted reality across various sectors. Below are some case studies illustrating how AI technologies can significantly improve operational performance.

5.1 Siemens – optimisation of electronic production lines

Siemens implemented an AI system based on reinforcement learning to manage assembly sequencing in electronic production lines. The system receives real-time data from IIoT sensors and uses it to determine the optimal production order.

Siemens – Electronics Works Amberg (EWA): Digital Twin and AI/Analytics for Production Optimisation

Technologies Used: Siemens’ Digital Enterprise platform, factory digital twin, IIoT sensors, and AI-driven analytics for planning, quality management, and production flexibility.

Reported results:

~1,000 product variants per day and 1 product per second in the same production space, enabled by full digitization of processes [18, 19].

Built-in quality of 99.9989%, achieved through full integration of design, engineering, and manufacturing data [18].

A 13-fold increase in production volume since 1990, without a significant increase in space or workforce, enabled by automation and continuous optimisation [19, 20].

High automation level in the value chain (including THT/SMT assembly; Through-Hole Technology (THT), Surface-Mount Technology (SMT)), with ~99.999% connection-level quality [21].

Operational benefits from the factory space digital twin: faster production line relocation planning, better space utilization, reduced travel costs, and the ability to conduct remote inspections and virtual tours [18].

5.2 BMW – AI-driven production and logistics optimisation

BMW developed a platform called Smart Production Scheduler, which uses AI algorithms to combine order priority, parts availability, and assembly station capacity.

Technologies used: AI-based orchestration of internal logistics, predictive maintenance systems, and full-scale digital twin simulations to optimize assembly line design and operation.

Reported results:

  • Up to 30% reduction in internal material lead time at the Regensburg plant has been achieved through an AI-powered orchestration system for over 500 Automated Guided Vehicles (AGVs), which continuously share position and battery data for real-time route optimisation [22].

  • Avoidance of approximately 500 minutes of assembly line disruption per year via AI-enabled predictive maintenance for conveyor systems, allowing faults to be anticipated and resolved before they cause downtime [23].

  • Increased flexibility and customization capability through the use of a virtual factory and digital twin technology, based on NVIDIA Omniverse, enabling real-time simulation of assembly workflows and ergonomic adjustments before physical implementation [24, 25].

5.3 Bosch – supply crisis response

During the COVID-19 pandemic, Bosch used AI systems to analyse different supply scenarios and prioritize production according to parts availability.

Bosch – AI-driven supply chain resilience & supply crisis response

Technologies Used: AI, IoT, real-time digital supply chain platforms (including demand forecasting, inventory optimisation, procurement systems, digital twins, and end-to-end visibility tools).

Reported results:

  • Up to 30% improvement in supply chain efficiency achieved through Bosch’s digital transformation initiatives, including AI-powered demand forecasting, predictive analytics, IoT tracking, procurement optimisation, and digital twin capabilities [26].

  • Reduction in supply–demand mismatches by up to 35%, thanks to automated demand forecasting tools processing millions of data points per day [26].

  • Enhanced supply chain resilience, enabled by real-time visibility via IoT and blockchain (e.g., the Trac360 platform), supports rapid scenario modeling, disruption response, and decentralized planning capabilities making agile responses possible within hours rather than days [26].

6. Challenges and considerations in AI implementation for production sequencing

Although AI offers exceptional opportunities for optimizing production sequencing and planning, its implementation is not without challenges. To ensure successful adoption, companies must address technical, organizational, social, and ethical issues.

Technical challenges

  1. Integration with existing systems

  2. Many factories use legacy Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) and Manufacturing Execution System (MES) systems that are not designed to work with modern AI algorithms. Integration requires significant investment in software and hardware.

  3. Data quality and availability

  4. AI algorithms are only as accurate as the data they receive. Incomplete, inaccurate, or fragmented data can lead to wrong decisions.

  5. Cybersecurity

  6. As manufacturing becomes more networked, the risk of cyberattacks that can paralyze processes increases.

Organizational and human challenges

  1. Resistance to change

  2. Employees may distrust or fear that AI will replace their jobs. This requires open communication and training programs, emphasizing AI as a supportive tool

  3. Lack of technical expertise

  4. Developing and maintaining AI systems requires scarce specialists, who are often costly to recruit

  5. Changing employee roles

  6. AI transforms worker profiles, shifting focus from routine tasks to strategic decision-making

Ethical and legal aspects

  1. Algorithm transparency

  2. Many AI models operate as “black boxes,” making it difficult to explain decisions. This can create challenges for auditing and accountability

  3. Inequality in access

  4. Large companies have more opportunities to invest in AI than small and medium enterprises, widening the technology gap

  5. Legal compliance

  6. Data privacy laws, such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the EU, require companies to carefully manage the information they use for AI.

A potential ethical risk lies in bias during job prioritization. For example, if the algorithm systematically favors larger or more profitable clients, smaller customers may experience consistent delays, creating unfair market dynamics. Another risk concerns worker privacy: predictive maintenance and quality control systems often rely on continuous monitoring of machine operators, raising questions about surveillance and data protection. To mitigate these risks, companies can adopt transparency policies, regularly audit algorithmic decisions for fairness, and ensure compliance with data protection frameworks such as GDPR. Embedding explainable AI (XAI) methods within LSJ can further help workers and managers understand why certain decisions are made, thereby building trust and accountability.

Strategies to overcome challenges

  • Gradual piloting – starting with small test projects before large-scale implementation.

  • Workforce training – Investing in digital skills so employees can collaborate with AI.

  • Developing data infrastructure – ensuring data accuracy, updates, and protection.

  • Using XAI – choosing models that provide clear explanations of decisions.

7. Conclusions and recommendations

This chapter addressed how AI is transforming production sequencing and planning in the Industry 4.0 and 5.0 era, with a special focus on the LSJ model. Real examples, practical applications, demonstrative Python code, and analyses of AI’s role in sustainability and organizational resilience were presented.

Case studies and analysis clearly show that AI can:

  • Optimize job order, reducing production time and costs.

  • Improve sustainability by reducing energy consumption and waste.

  • Increase company resilience against sudden changes and crises.

  • Empower humans in strategic decision-making by combining human skills with AI’s speed of analysis.

Key contributions of the LSJ model

The LSJ model stands out for:

  • Integrating customer priorities, product complexities, and resource availability into unified decision-making.

  • Flexibility to adapt to real-time changes in production conditions.

  • Ability to incorporate sustainability indicators as part of the algorithm.

Recommendations for Industry

  1. Gradual AI adoption – start with small pilot projects to test feasibility before making large investments.

  2. Integration with existing systems – ensure AI works harmoniously with ERP, MES, and IIoT platforms.

  3. Continuous training – empower employees with digital skills to collaborate with AI systems.

  4. Environmental impact monitoring – Use AI not only for economic efficiency but also to reduce the ecological footprint.

Recommendations for scientific research

  1. Development of XAI algorithms to increase transparency in decision-making.

  2. Integration of uncertainty factors (e.g., supply delays, equipment failures) into sequencing models.

  3. Cross-sector studies compare AI applications across different industries.

  4. Multi-objective combined optimisation, balancing cost, time, quality, and environmental impact.

In conclusion, AI-driven production sequencing, supported by models like LSJ, represents a significant step toward smarter, more sustainable, and more resilient manufacturing. Over the next decade, these technologies are expected to become standard in the manufacturing industry, transforming how enterprises plan, produce, and distribute their products.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Nomenclature

LSJi

Launching Sequence of the i-th customer order (job).

COSi

Customer Order Significance of the i-th job.

PSi

Product Significance of the i-th job.

MSipl

Material Significance of the i-th job, the p-th product, and the l-th part.

TPSiplo

Technological Processes Significance of the i-th job, the p-th product, the l-th part, and o-th operation.

CRi

Customer Relevance factor.

QDPi

Quantity of Different Products in the customer order.

NBRi

Number of Batches Required factor.

CPRi

The Complexity of Providing Resources per customer order.

FCi

Financial Contribution factor.

DDi

Delivery Date (Due Date) factor.

EPi

Expected Profit factor for the i-th customer order.

Qopti

Optimal Batch quantity [piece].

Qil

Demands [piece].

OCil

Order Cost [].

HCil

Holding Costs per piece [€/piece].

MTik

Manufacturing (Processing) Time on k-th capacity for i-th order.

SuTplo

Setup Time of the p-th product, l-th part, o-th operation on the i-th customer order.

Qpi

Number of the p-th product on the i-th customer order.

LTplo

Loading Time of the p-th product, o-th operation, l-th part on i-th customer order.

UTplo

Unloading Time of the p-th product, o-th operation, l-th part on i-th customer order.

OTplo

Operation Time of the p-th product, o-th operation, l-th part on i-th customer order.

TTplo

Total Transport Time between o-th and (o−1)-th operations of the p-th product, l-th part on the i-th customer order.

DTOplo

Delays Time between Operations – Machine Idle Time.

DDi

Due Date, the deadline for delivery of the i-th customer order.

LD

Launching Date.

Zk

Business of k-th capacity in the planning period (from launch time).

FCk

Capacity Factor for the i-th customer order.

PCip

The Product Complexity factor.

PTip

The Product Type factor.

RQip

The Required Quality factor.

Binary decision variables: FCk={1, if kth capacity is used on theith customer order0, if kth capacity is not used on theith customer order

References

  1. 1. Rashid AB, Kausik MAK. AI revolutionizing industries worldwide: A comprehensive overview of its diverse applications. Hybrid Advances. 2024;7:100277. DOI: 10.1016/j.hybadv.2024.100277
  2. 2. Zhong RY, Xu X, Klotz E, Newman ST. 2017. Intelligent manufacturing in the context of Industry 4.0: A review. Engineering. 3(5):616630. DOI: 10.1016/j.eng.2017.05.015
  3. 3. Renda A, Schwaag Serger S, Tataj D, Morlet A, Isaksson D, Martins F, Giovannini E (2022). Industry 5.0: A transformative vision for Europe – Governing systemic transformations towards a sustainable industry
  4. 4. Prasad A, Kumar AS, Sharma P, Irawati ID, DV C, Musirin IB, Abdullah HMA. Artificial intelligence in computer science: An overview of current trends and future directions. Advances in Artificial and Human Intelligence in the Modern Era. 2023;43–60.
  5. 5. Jeong S, Na W, Kim J, Cho S. 2018. Internet of Things for smart manufacturing system: Trust issues in resource allocation. IEEE Internet of Things Journal. 5(6):44184427. DOI: 10.1109/JIOT.2018.2853660
  6. 6. Azemi F, Lujic R, Šimunović G, Šimunović K, Ahmeti F. 2024. Improving production sequencing in the age of Industry 4.0: A mathematical launching model approach. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management. 17(3):698720. DOI: 10.3926/jiem.4737
  7. 7. Peretz-Andersson E, Tabares S, Mikalef P, Parida V. Artificial intelligence implementation in manufacturing SMEs: A resource orchestration approach. International Journal of Information Management. 2024;77:102781. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2024.102781
  8. 8. Elkateb S, Métwalli A, Shendy A, Abu-Elanien AEB. Machine learning and IoT-based predictive maintenance approach for industrial applications. Alexandria Engineering Journal. 2024;88:298309. DOI: 10.1016/j.aej.2023.12.065
  9. 9. Olawade DB, Fapohunda O, Wada OZ, Usman SO, Ige AO, Ajisafe O, Oladapo BI. 2024. Smart waste management: A paradigm shift enabled by artificial intelligence. Waste Management Bulletin. 2(2):244263. DOI: 10.1016/j.wmb.2024.05.001
  10. 10. Islam MR, Zamil MZH, Rayed ME, Kabir MM, Mridha MF, Nishimura S, Shin J (2024). Deep learning and computer vision techniques for enhanced quality control in manufacturing processes. IEEE Access. 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.1234567 (vendos DOI-n real nëse e ke)
  11. 11. Ettalibi A, Elouadi A, Mansour A. AI and computer vision-based real-time quality control: A review of industrial applications. Procedia Computer Science. 2024;231:212220. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2024.01.023
  12. 12. Feng S, Shafiei MWM, Ng TF, Ren J, Jiang Y. The intersection of economic growth and environmental sustainability in China: Pathways to achieving SDG. Energy Strategy Reviews. 2024;55:101530. DOI: 10.1016/j.esr.2024.101530
  13. 13. Zhang Y, Li T, Zhao C, Li J, Huang R, Zhang Q, Li Y, Li X. An integrated smart sensor dressing for real-time wound microenvironment monitoring and promoting angiogenesis and wound healing. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology. 2021;9:701525. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2021.701525
  14. 14. Hassan M, Misra M, Taylor GW, Mohanty AK. A review of AI for optimization of 3D printing of sustainable polymers and composites. Composites Part C: Open Access. 2024;15:100513. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomc.2024.100513
  15. 15. Tseng C-J, Lin S-Y. Role of artificial intelligence in carbon cost reduction of firms. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2024;447:141413. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141413
  16. 16. Hanif R, Khalique M, Pierotti M, Goyipnazarov S, Ngah R, Ermatov T (2025). Impact of artificial intelligence on organizational resilience and sustainable performance. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Future Networks & Distributed Systems (ICFNDS ‘24) (pp. 465471). ACM. DOI: 10.1145/3726122.3726189
  17. 17. Nahavandi S. 2019. Industry 5.0—A human-centric solution. Sustainability. 11(16):4371. DOI: 10.3390/su11164371
  18. 18. Siemens AG (n.d.). Electronics Works Amberg – Digital Enterprise in Practice. Available from: https://resources.sw.siemens.com/en-US/electronics-works-amberg [Accessed: 2025-June-25]
  19. 19. NavVis GmbH. (n.d.). Siemens Electronics Works Amberg Uses Digital Twin to Optimize Operations. Available from: https://www.navvis.com/blog/siemens-electronics-works-amberg-digital-twin [Accessed: 2025-June-25]
  20. 20. Siemens AG (n.d.). Digitalization at Electronics Works Amberg. Available from: https://new.siemens.com/global/en/company/stories/industry/digitalization/electronics-works-amberg.html [Accessed: 2025-June-25]
  21. 21. JUKI Corporation. (n.d.). Case Study: SMT and THT Automation at Siemens Amberg. Available from: https://www.jukiamericas.com/siemens-amberg-case-study [Accessed: 2025-June-30]
  22. 22. Automotive Manufacturing Solutions. (n.d.). The Shift to Smarter, More Flexible Manufacturing. Available from: https://www.automotivemanufacturingsolutions.com/smart-factory/the-shift-to-smarter-more-flexible-manufacturing/47309.article [Accessed: 2025-June-30]
  23. 23. BMW PressClub. (n.d.). Smart Maintenance Using Artificial Intelligence. Available from: https://www.press.bmwgroup.com/global/article/detail/T0438145EN/smart-maintenance-using-artificial-intelligence[Accessed: 2025-June-31]
  24. 24. Wired. (n.d.). BMW’s Virtual Factory Uses AI to Hone the Assembly Line. Available from: https://www.wired.com/story/bmw-virtual-factory-ai-hone-assembly-line [Accessed: 2025-July -1]
  25. 25. Assembly Magazine. (n.d.). BMW Applies AI to Assembly. Available from: https://www.assemblymag.com/articles/97139-bmw-applies-ai-to-assembly[Accessed: 2025-July-1]
  26. 26. Tradlinx Blogs. [Tracking Success] How Bosch Builds a Resilient and Sustainable Supply Chain: https://blogs.tradlinx.com/tracking-success-how-bosch-builds-a-resilient-and-sustainable-supply-chain/ [Accessed: 2025-July-3]

Written By

Fatmir Azemi, Faruk Ahmeti

Submitted: 14 August 2025 Reviewed: 25 August 2025 Published: 01 December 2025