Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 7 – uploaded by Anna Exner

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
3.3. Summary Statistics for Power Calculation with 20 pct. Missing Data and Varying Intercepts:

Table 7 3.3. Summary Statistics for Power Calculation with 20 pct. Missing Data and Varying Intercepts:

Related Figures (32)

Figure 1. This figure (adapted from Bergmann and Cristia*) depicts Hunter & Ames’ model?® of infant looking to familiar (plotted up) and novel (plotted down) stimuli at different levels of pre- test familiarization time (shown on the x-axis). The dashed line indicates equal preference for familiar and novel stimuli. The grey line represents the model’s prediction for older infants, and the black line for younger infants. The “lower complexity” and “higher complexity” arrows social cognition, among others.*!?3!-*4
Figure 1. This figure (adapted from Bergmann and Cristia*) depicts Hunter & Ames’ model?® of infant looking to familiar (plotted up) and novel (plotted down) stimuli at different levels of pre- test familiarization time (shown on the x-axis). The dashed line indicates equal preference for familiar and novel stimuli. The grey line represents the model’s prediction for older infants, and the black line for younger infants. The “lower complexity” and “higher complexity” arrows social cognition, among others.*!?3!-*4
Figure 2. Examples of low- and high-complexity Fribble and Fractal stimuli. The full set of stimuli will be available in the project repository on OSF. of the same pattern. All stimuli will be openly available in the project repository on OSF.
Figure 2. Examples of low- and high-complexity Fribble and Fractal stimuli. The full set of stimuli will be available in the project repository on OSF. of the same pattern. All stimuli will be openly available in the project repository on OSF.
encouraged to use any attention-getter that is a better match for their lab or community. Figure 3. This figure depicts the design of an example trial. At familiarization, a single image is shown for 5, 10, or 15 s. After the desired familiarization time is reached (based on the infant- controlled or fixed-length design criteria), infants are presented with a central fixation stimulus. During the two test phases (5 s each), infants view the same image to which they were familiarized paired with a new stimulus from the same set (e.g., fribbles or fractals) and the same
encouraged to use any attention-getter that is a better match for their lab or community. Figure 3. This figure depicts the design of an example trial. At familiarization, a single image is shown for 5, 10, or 15 s. After the desired familiarization time is reached (based on the infant- controlled or fixed-length design criteria), infants are presented with a central fixation stimulus. During the two test phases (5 s each), infants view the same image to which they were familiarized paired with a new stimulus from the same set (e.g., fribbles or fractals) and the same
Table 1.
Table 1.
§ Power Calculation with Full Data and Varying Intercepts and Varying Slope: 5 Grid Search Code
§ Power Calculation with Full Data and Varying Intercepts and Varying Slope: 5 Grid Search Code
Familiarization x Complexity Interaction
Familiarization x Complexity Interaction
Table 1: Power for Simulations with Full Data and Varying Intercepts and Varying Slopes
Table 1: Power for Simulations with Full Data and Varying Intercepts and Varying Slopes
Table 3: Power for Simulations with 20 pct. Missing Data and Varying Intercepts and Slopes 3.4 Summary Statistics for Power Calculation with 50 pct. Missing Data and Varying Intercepts:
Table 3: Power for Simulations with 20 pct. Missing Data and Varying Intercepts and Slopes 3.4 Summary Statistics for Power Calculation with 50 pct. Missing Data and Varying Intercepts:
Table 5: Bias for Simulations with Full Data and Varying Intercepts and Varying Slopes Table 6: Bias for Simulations with Full Data and Varying Intercepts
Table 5: Bias for Simulations with Full Data and Varying Intercepts and Varying Slopes Table 6: Bias for Simulations with Full Data and Varying Intercepts
Table 7: Bias for Simulations with 20 pct. Missing Data and Varying Intercepts and Slopes
Table 7: Bias for Simulations with 20 pct. Missing Data and Varying Intercepts and Slopes
Table 8: Bias for Simulations with 50 pct. Missing Data and Varying Intercepts and Slopes
Table 8: Bias for Simulations with 50 pct. Missing Data and Varying Intercepts and Slopes
Related topics:
PsychologyCognitive Psychology
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved