Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 1 – uploaded by Ezeddin H . Alshbuki

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
In this application, PIPESYS Version7.3 from Aspen Technology, Inc. and it's an extension of Aspet HYSYS 3.1 software the performance style of the little gas condensation assembly system was designed Th« steps and method of the solution that were performed in the program are shown previously (2021). The subsequent figure shows the physical composition of this technique on a topographical map. The systen consists of 3 wells cover a section of roughly one square mile connected to a gas plant through a network o} pipelines. Figure 1. Field data show that wells provide the following rates

Figure 1 In this application, PIPESYS Version7.3 from Aspen Technology, Inc. and it's an extension of Aspet HYSYS 3.1 software the performance style of the little gas condensation assembly system was designed Th« steps and method of the solution that were performed in the program are shown previously (2021). The subsequent figure shows the physical composition of this technique on a topographical map. The systen consists of 3 wells cover a section of roughly one square mile connected to a gas plant through a network o} pipelines. Figure 1. Field data show that wells provide the following rates

Related Figures (10)

The three wells have the same composition. The residue of all heavier components of the condensate has a molecular weight of 122 and a density of 760 kg / m*. The properties of this component are taken into account using the hypothetical installation of the component in HYSYS. The analysis of the composition of the gas condensate produced the following information in Table 1(Fanaei, 2010): Type 40 steel tubing is used everywhere and all branches are buried 0.914 meter deep. Not all pipes are insulated. The consequent table summarizes the peak knowledge for all branches. The peak provided for the tube units corresponds to the pipe termination (i.e. downstream end). The peak and diameters of the tube and also the length of every branch are shown in Table 2 (Fanaei, 2010):
The three wells have the same composition. The residue of all heavier components of the condensate has a molecular weight of 122 and a density of 760 kg / m*. The properties of this component are taken into account using the hypothetical installation of the component in HYSYS. The analysis of the composition of the gas condensate produced the following information in Table 1(Fanaei, 2010): Type 40 steel tubing is used everywhere and all branches are buried 0.914 meter deep. Not all pipes are insulated. The consequent table summarizes the peak knowledge for all branches. The peak provided for the tube units corresponds to the pipe termination (i.e. downstream end). The peak and diameters of the tube and also the length of every branch are shown in Table 2 (Fanaei, 2010):
The branches showing the uneven landscape are partitioned into a few areas with height focuses characterized for the focuses where the slant changes fundamentally. These situations in the exhibit are set apart in the schematic bar outline with the stature value. For each branch, the rise and distance data acquired from the geological guide is shown. With this information, it is conceivable to take off the presentation of a specific framework utilizing the PIPESYS augmentation, at that point figure significant boundaries, for example, pressure drops, temperature changes, and the measure of liquid maintenance. Notwithstanding determining stream frameworks. In this work, the pace of each borehole is determined and is autonomous of he pace of some other borehole. In such cases, the framework can be displayed with a solitary assurance of he pressing factor drop per branch. Simultaneously, temperature and pressing factor figuring’s can be made if the temperature of each well is known. As the pressing factors are constant all through the organization, pressing factors must be given in one spot. For instance, the pressing factor can be changed at each borehole or at the last conveyance point and PIPESYS will figure the pressing factor somewhere else. A pressing factor of 7308 kPa is indicated for opening A. PIPESYS at that point decides the pressing factors in different pieces of the framework that meet this detail. In the event that conceivable, heat move figuring’s should be made toward the stream. The temperatures of the wellheads are likewise known. For this work, the emperatures of the liquids in Welles A, B, and C are referred to and should be entered as indicated conditions. Figure 2. Schematic Process Flow Diagram for the pipeline system
The branches showing the uneven landscape are partitioned into a few areas with height focuses characterized for the focuses where the slant changes fundamentally. These situations in the exhibit are set apart in the schematic bar outline with the stature value. For each branch, the rise and distance data acquired from the geological guide is shown. With this information, it is conceivable to take off the presentation of a specific framework utilizing the PIPESYS augmentation, at that point figure significant boundaries, for example, pressure drops, temperature changes, and the measure of liquid maintenance. Notwithstanding determining stream frameworks. In this work, the pace of each borehole is determined and is autonomous of he pace of some other borehole. In such cases, the framework can be displayed with a solitary assurance of he pressing factor drop per branch. Simultaneously, temperature and pressing factor figuring’s can be made if the temperature of each well is known. As the pressing factors are constant all through the organization, pressing factors must be given in one spot. For instance, the pressing factor can be changed at each borehole or at the last conveyance point and PIPESYS will figure the pressing factor somewhere else. A pressing factor of 7308 kPa is indicated for opening A. PIPESYS at that point decides the pressing factors in different pieces of the framework that meet this detail. In the event that conceivable, heat move figuring’s should be made toward the stream. The temperatures of the wellheads are likewise known. For this work, the emperatures of the liquids in Welles A, B, and C are referred to and should be entered as indicated conditions. Figure 2. Schematic Process Flow Diagram for the pipeline system
Table 3:Summary of results of the mass and energy balancing values for all network lines Table 3 shows the results of the mass and energy balancing values for all network lines and streams shown in Figure 2 in SI units at Adjusted operating pressure and Normal operating pressure. This is evident in the pressure change of well A before and after the adjustment process of the network pressure operating system, and this is positive for the stability of the flow rate and the rate of production of the well.
Table 3:Summary of results of the mass and energy balancing values for all network lines Table 3 shows the results of the mass and energy balancing values for all network lines and streams shown in Figure 2 in SI units at Adjusted operating pressure and Normal operating pressure. This is evident in the pressure change of well A before and after the adjustment process of the network pressure operating system, and this is positive for the stability of the flow rate and the rate of production of the well.
Figures 3 and 4 shows the change in temperature and pressure on the arrangement through the fifth branch of the pipeline network. This was calculated using three models of state equations, namely Soave-Redlich- Kwong equation of state; (SRK), Peng-Robinson; (PR), Peng-Robinson-Stryjek-Vera; (PRSV). By observing the curves of the obtained results, they were close, and the Peng Robinson equation was adopted in calculating the rest of the results in this work because it is more appropriate and from Figure 4 it was found that the largest value of the pressure drop was in the middle of the branch approximately due to the influencing flow factors.
Figures 3 and 4 shows the change in temperature and pressure on the arrangement through the fifth branch of the pipeline network. This was calculated using three models of state equations, namely Soave-Redlich- Kwong equation of state; (SRK), Peng-Robinson; (PR), Peng-Robinson-Stryjek-Vera; (PRSV). By observing the curves of the obtained results, they were close, and the Peng Robinson equation was adopted in calculating the rest of the results in this work because it is more appropriate and from Figure 4 it was found that the largest value of the pressure drop was in the middle of the branch approximately due to the influencing flow factors.
Figure 3.Temperature change during the Branch 5 of the pipe network
Figure 3.Temperature change during the Branch 5 of the pipe network
Figure 4. Pressure change during the Branch 5 of the pipe network
Figure 4. Pressure change during the Branch 5 of the pipe network
Figure 5. Hydrate formation condition and Phase diagram Figure 6showing the thermal loss of each part of the pipelines in the case of thermal insulation with a layer of asphalt with a thickness of one mm and without insulation, as it was found that the largest event occurred in the second part and this is due to the large length of this part compared to the rest of the parts in the network.
Figure 5. Hydrate formation condition and Phase diagram Figure 6showing the thermal loss of each part of the pipelines in the case of thermal insulation with a layer of asphalt with a thickness of one mm and without insulation, as it was found that the largest event occurred in the second part and this is due to the large length of this part compared to the rest of the parts in the network.
Figure 6.Thermal loss in network branches
Figure 6.Thermal loss in network branches
Figure 7 shows the operating pressure of the three wells and Branch 5 in the case of normal operation an adjusted operation where there is a clear difference between the two cases and it is preferable to operate th network over the adjusted mode because of its more advantages. Figure 7. Normal and Adjusted pressure of three wells last stream
Figure 7 shows the operating pressure of the three wells and Branch 5 in the case of normal operation an adjusted operation where there is a clear difference between the two cases and it is preferable to operate th network over the adjusted mode because of its more advantages. Figure 7. Normal and Adjusted pressure of three wells last stream
Related topics:
Chemical Engineering
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved