Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Table 1. Companies with extreme earnings management coefficients  Analyzing the earnings management variable we found there were 12 observations with extreme values, i.e., excessively large values in relation to the other observations in the data set, as shown in Table 1 below. In the years when these extreme values occurred, the independent auditors’ reports all expressed no reservation. Besides , only one of the companies (Aco Altona) was audited by one of the Big Four (Ernest & Young Auditores Independentes S.C.). In the years before and after the extreme value occurrence the auditor was the same, except for Bicicletas Caloi S.A., which changed the auditor in the year of the extreme value.  We performed a descriptive analysis with and without these outliers. The results showed that the earnings management coefficients of the companies were on average higher when analyzed with the extreme values. In terms of relative dispersion, the earnings management values were more dispersed when analyzed with outliers, as expected. The highest and lowest earnings management values were 28.4936 and 4.3773e-05, respectively, as shown in Table 2.

Table 1 Companies with extreme earnings management coefficients Analyzing the earnings management variable we found there were 12 observations with extreme values, i.e., excessively large values in relation to the other observations in the data set, as shown in Table 1 below. In the years when these extreme values occurred, the independent auditors’ reports all expressed no reservation. Besides , only one of the companies (Aco Altona) was audited by one of the Big Four (Ernest & Young Auditores Independentes S.C.). In the years before and after the extreme value occurrence the auditor was the same, except for Bicicletas Caloi S.A., which changed the auditor in the year of the extreme value. We performed a descriptive analysis with and without these outliers. The results showed that the earnings management coefficients of the companies were on average higher when analyzed with the extreme values. In terms of relative dispersion, the earnings management values were more dispersed when analyzed with outliers, as expected. The highest and lowest earnings management values were 28.4936 and 4.3773e-05, respectively, as shown in Table 2.