Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Figure 5 – uploaded by Andi Kusumawati

See full PDFdownloadDownload figure
Table 9. Summary Model influenced by motivation with mathematical equations: Auditor Performance = 15,529 + 03,330 Motivation 0.326, this means that 32.6% of the variation in Table 10 results where the constant is 15.529 variations of the independent motivational variables, while 67.4% is explained by other causes outside the model.

Table 9 Summary Model influenced by motivation with mathematical equations: Auditor Performance = 15,529 + 03,330 Motivation 0.326, this means that 32.6% of the variation in Table 10 results where the constant is 15.529 variations of the independent motivational variables, while 67.4% is explained by other causes outside the model.

Related Figures (11)

variables. This test is used to determine the effect by men, this condition can be a consideration that
variables. This test is used to determine the effect by men, this condition can be a consideration that
Table 2. Gender, Age, Education, and Years of Research Respondents Years of service
Table 2. Gender, Age, Education, and Years of Research Respondents Years of service
Table 3. Descriptive Statistics
Table 3. Descriptive Statistics
Table 8. Coefficients experience working the 0447 audit performance variables influenced by the work experience with the mathematical equation: Performance = 11.113 +0447 Auditor Work Experience. Table8 the results where the constants of 1.113. and a_ regression coefficient of es ee, yy oy 7 Oe SE 0 ee Effect of Motivationon Auditor Performance
Table 8. Coefficients experience working the 0447 audit performance variables influenced by the work experience with the mathematical equation: Performance = 11.113 +0447 Auditor Work Experience. Table8 the results where the constants of 1.113. and a_ regression coefficient of es ee, yy oy 7 Oe SE 0 ee Effect of Motivationon Auditor Performance
Table 10. Coefficients
Table 10. Coefficients
Table 11. Summary Model Table 11 of the model summary regression analysis shows that the magnitude of adjusted R? culture with a mathematical equation: Auditor's Performance = 19,046 + 0,269 Culture. Table 12 results where the constant is 19.046
Table 11. Summary Model Table 11 of the model summary regression analysis shows that the magnitude of adjusted R? culture with a mathematical equation: Auditor's Performance = 19,046 + 0,269 Culture. Table 12 results where the constant is 19.046
Table 13. Summary Model Effect of Work Experience, Motivation, Culture on Auditor Performance mediated by Self-efficacy
Table 13. Summary Model Effect of Work Experience, Motivation, Culture on Auditor Performance mediated by Self-efficacy
Table 12. Coefficients
Table 12. Coefficients
Table 14. Coefficients variables are 0.243 and cultural variables are
Table 14. Coefficients variables are 0.243 and cultural variables are
regression tests, namely (1) the regression test of the independent variable to the mediator, (2) independent of the dependent, and (3) the mediator of the dependent. Baron and Kenny (1986) state that for the
regression tests, namely (1) the regression test of the independent variable to the mediator, (2) independent of the dependent, and (3) the mediator of the dependent. Baron and Kenny (1986) state that for the
Table 16. Coefficients 0.122, cultural variables are 0.137, and self-
Table 16. Coefficients 0.122, cultural variables are 0.137, and self-
Related topics:
Psychology
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved