Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

The Rest is Silence: A Remark on the Micro-Fascism of Critique

Abstract

But the other night is always other. It is only during the day one believes to understand it, to seize it. In the day it is that secret which can be revealed, that darkness that awaits to be unveiled. The passion for the night only the day can feel. It is only during the day that death can be desired, contemplated, decided: attained. It is only during the day the other night can show itself as that love which can break all ties, and desires an ending and to join the abyss. But in the night it is that which one cannot be united, the reiteration that will never end, the saturation that possess nothing, a sparkling of something without ground and without depth. (Maurice Blanchot, L'inspiration, 1955)

Key takeaways
sparkles

AI

  1. The text critiques micro-fascist intellectualism within the context of artistic critique and its societal implications.
  2. It explores the concept of silence as a space for potentiality, not merely absence or negation.
  3. Death and life are intertwined, representing a continuum rather than oppositional states.
  4. Art's originality emerges from its inherent nothingness, challenging traditional critiques of historical significance.
  5. Translation serves as a transformative process that simultaneously destroys and creates meaning within language.

FAQs

sparkles

AI

What key finding relates to micro-fascism and critique in intellectual discourse?add

The work reveals that micro-fascist intellectualism emerges from a position of moral-rightfulness, which creates an intense ressentiment and restricts voices of the marginalized.

How does silence function as a concept in the text's critique of art?add

Silence is described as the inherent secret of art, a space filled with potentiality that resists historical and moral interpretations, embodying a form of 'virtual singularis'.

What implications does the paper suggest for the role of the critic in art?add

The paper argues that the critic should destructively engage with the artwork, freeing it from historicism rather than providing moral judgments or privileged commentary.

How does death relate to the notion of becoming in the paper's arguments?add

Death is framed as not oppositional to life but a continuum that facilitates a perpetual state of becoming, reflecting an ongoing cycle within the artistic and existential experience.

What unique perspective does the text offer regarding translation and language?add

Translation is presented as a destructive yet renewing force in language, pointing towards an immanent silence that transcends traditional linguistic frameworks.