Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Audit Quality of The Engagement Partner and Audit Firm

Riset Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INTACC.2008.01.001

Abstract

This study examines the effect of the number of clients and complexity on audit quality at the audit engagement partner (AEP) and public accounting firm (PAF) levels. We use discretionary accrual and real activities manipulation models to assess the audit quality at the AEP and PAF levels. Our study examines 506 firm-year observations as our sample for the companies in the industrial sector listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange. Using multiple linear regressions and controlling for year and industry fixed effects, our study discovered that the client complexity handled by AEPs is associated with the declining audit quality of AEPs using discretionary accruals. However, our study discovered no relationship between the number of clients at the AEP and PAF levels, and client complexity at the PAF level that influences the audit quality. Thus, the findings of our study suggest to standard setters, capital market participants, and other stakeholders that audit quality at the AEP level ...

References (19)

  1. -ISSN:1411-6510 e-ISSN :2541-6111
  2. Carey, P., & Simnett, R. (2006). Audit partner tenure and audit quality. The Accounting Review, 81(3), 653- 676. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2006.81.3.653
  3. Chi, H. Y., & Chin, C. L. (2011). Firm versus partner measures of auditor industry expertise and effects on auditor quality. Auditing: A Jurnal of Practice & Theory, 30(2), 201-229. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt- 50004
  4. Chi, W., Douthett, E. B., & Lisic, L. L. (2012). Client importance and audit partner independence. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 31(3), 320-336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2011.08.009
  5. Chin, C. L., & Chi, H. Y. (2009). Reducing restatements with increased industry expertise. Contemporary Accounting Research, 26(3), 729-765. https://doi.org/10.1506/car.26.3.4
  6. Francis, J.R. (2011). A Framework for understanding and researching audit quality. Auditing: A Jurnal of Practice & Theory, 30(2), 125-152. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50006
  7. Goodwin, J., & Wu, D. (2016). What is the relationship between audit partner busyness and audit quality? Contemporary Accounting Research, 33(1), 341-377. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12129
  8. Greiner, A., Kohlbeck, M. J., & Smith, T. J. (2017). The relationship between aggressive real earnings management and current and future audit fees. Auditing: A Jurnal of Practice & Theory, 36(1), 85-107. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51516
  9. Gul, F. A., Wu, D., & Yang, Z. (2013). Do individual auditors affect audit quality? Evidence from archival data. Accounting Review, 88(6), 1993-2023. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50536
  10. Herusetya, A. (2012). Analisis kualitas audit terhadap manajemen laba akuntansi: studi pendekatan composite measure versus conventional measure. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 9(2), 117-135. https://doi.org/10.21002/jaki.2012.08
  11. Herusetya, A., & Jaunanda, M. (2021). Does industry expertise at engagement partner and audit firm level matter in emerging market? Evidence from Indonesia. Accounting, 7(4), 951-964. https://doi. org/10.5267/j.ac.2021.1.012
  12. Hsieh, Y. T., & Lin, C. J. (2016). Audit firms' client acceptance decisions: Does partner-level industry expertise matter? Auditing: A Jurnal of Practice & Theory, 35(2), 97-120. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51292
  13. Hussin, W. N. W, Bamahros, H. M., & Shukeri, S. N. (2018). Lead engagement partner workload, partner- client tenure and audit reporting lag: Evidence from Malaysia. Managerial Auditing Journal, 33(3), 246-266. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-07-2017-1601
  14. Iatridis, G. E. (2012). Audit quality in common-law and code-law emerging markets: Evidence on earnings conservatism, agency costs and cost of equity. Emerging Markets Review, 13(2), 101-117. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ememar.2012.01.001
  15. Kim, Y., & Park, M. S. (2014). Real activities manipulation and auditors' client-retention decisions. Accounting Review, 89(1), 367-401. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50586
  16. Lai, K. M. Y., Sasmita, A., Gul, F. A., Foo, Y. B., & Hutchinson, M. (2018). Busy auditors, ethical behavior, and discretionary accruals quality in Malaysia. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(4), 1187-1198. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3152-4
  17. Lennox, C. S., & Wu, X. (2018). A review of the archival literature on audit partners. The Accounting Horizons, 32(2), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-51942
  18. Ministry of the State Secretariat. (2015). Government Regulation of The Republic of Indonesia Number 20 Year 2015 about Practice of Public Accounting. Available at https://jdih.kemenkeu.go.id/ fullText/2015/20TAHUN2015PP.pdf
  19. Setiawan, L., & Fitriany, F. (2011). Pengaruh workload dan spesialisasi auditor terhadap kualitas audit dengan kualitas komite audit sebagai variabel pemoderasi. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 8(1), 36-53. https://doi.org/10.21002/jaki.2011.03