German Version    English Version


--- St. John at the Last Supper ---

With the huge commercial success of Dan Brown's novel "The Da Vinci Code", some of the theories from this book became very popular. One of them says that Leonardo da Vinci placed Mary Magdalene and not St. John next to Jesus in his Last Supper painting. I saw a lot of people taking this assumption for real - they look at the painting and shout: "Oh yes, it's a woman!" They seem to believe that Leonardo's version of that famous scene would be unique. Fact is, that many other artist gave St. John, who was called "the beloved disciple" in the Bible, a certain look, which is now considered by many people as "feminine", but not necessarily five centuries ago. Since ancient times he was believed to be very young, so young that he did not even have a real growth of beard. You can also see his long hair and the devouted gestures on many other paintings of the Renaissance. This hairstyle was very fashionable for young Italians at the time of Leonardo. It should be noted that even other apostles were sometimes depicted in the same way.

We must try to understand the viewpoint of these artists, who grew up in an androcentric environment - men and boys had a far more important position in this society than in the western world of today. The ideal of beauty since the 19th century became very gynocentric - a cute face is since then usually interpreted as "feminine", although most traits of a woman aren't specifically female. Compare the face of a pretty actress with the ones of young boys and you see it yourself: what still remains of the so called "Kindchenschema" makes most people believe that women would be the beautiful gender. Since St. John was considered to be very young, he was simply not old enough to look very adult. That is the reason, why people mistake him for a female, just like many long haired boys were mistaken for girls in the 70s by elderly people. They were not used to that look just like most readers of Dan Brown's novel are not familiar with depictions of St. John, done by other artists. I decided to show you some examples to underline my arguments.

click to enlarge
Duccio di Buoninsegna
1308 - 1311
click to enlarge
Giotto di Bondone
1320 - 1325
click to enlarge
Jaume Serra
1370 - 1400
click to enlarge
Bertram von Minden
1390 - 1400
click to enlarge
Andrea del Castagno
c. 1447
click to enlarge
Jaume Baço Jacomart
c. 1450
click to enlarge
Dieric Bouts the elder
1464 - 1467
click to enlarge
Jaume Huguet
c. 1470
click to enlarge
Cosimo Rosselli
1481 - 1482
click to enlarge
Domenico Ghirlandaio
c. 1486
click to enlarge
Gil de Siloe
c. 1500
click to enlarge
Luca Signorelli
1502
click to enlarge
Hans Schäufelin
1515
click to enlarge
Andrea del Sarto
1520 - 1525
click to enlarge
Hans Holbein the younger
1524 - 1525
click to enlarge
Jacobo Bassano
1542
click to enlarge
Juan de Juanes
c. 1560
click to enlarge
El Greco
1568
click to enlarge
Daniele Crespi
1624 - 1625
click to enlarge
Valentin de Boulogne
1625 - 1626



--- Other depictions of the Apostle ---

The following paintings present the apostle in another context. Like in the Last Supper, he was depicted by most artists as a long haired teenager. Other painters, especially those from Germany and the Netherlands, gave him an older appearance, but even there he is almost always beardless. Again you'll see that Leonardo's way to portray him was hardly so unusual as Dan Brown wants us to believe. Even artists, who couldn't see Leonardo's "Last Supper" before they started doing their own work, depicted the apostle like that, so everybody, who claims they just copied Leonardo's idea, is therefore wrong.

click to enlarge
Duccio di Buoninsegna
"Washing of the feet"
1308 - 1311
click to enlarge
unknown Artist
"Jesus Christ and the Apostle John"
c. 1320
click to enlarge
Andrea da Firenze
"Crucifixion"
1370 - 1377
click to enlarge
Jean Malouel
"Pietà"
1400 - 1410
click to enlarge
Antonio da Firenze
"Crucifixion"
1400 - 1450
click to enlarge
Dieric Bouts the elder
"Christ in the House of Simon"
c. 1440
click to enlarge
Antonello da Messina
"Crucifixion"
1475
click to enlarge
Sandro Botticelli
"Pietà"
c. 1490
click to enlarge
Raffaello
"Crucifixion"
1502 - 1503
click to enlarge
El Greco
"Crucifixion"
1588



--- St. John the Evangelist ---

According to the Christian tradion, the Apostle John and John the Evangelist would be one and the same person. It doesn't matter, whether modern experts share that idea, since artists from medieval times, the Renaissance and the Baroque era only knew, what everybody was told back then. That is why the Evangelist is often depicted in the same way as the Apostle. Sometimes we see a bearded John the Evangelist, especially when the artist wants to show how he looked at the end of his life as he was said to have died at a very old age.

click to enlarge
Pietro Lorenzetti
c. 1320
click to enlarge
Jan van Eyck
1432
click to enlarge
Juan de Juanes
1445 - 1450
click to enlarge
Martin Schongauer
1470 - 1475
click to enlarge
Hans Memling
1475
click to enlarge
Veit Stoss
1477 - 1489
click to enlarge
Hieronymus Bosch
c. 1490
click to enlarge
Fra Bartolommeo
1504
click to enlarge
Gerard David
1505
click to enlarge
Hans Baldung
c. 1515
click to enlarge
Andrea del Sarto
1517
click to enlarge
Correggio
1520 - 1524
click to enlarge
El Greco
1594 - 1604
click to enlarge
El Greco
c. 1608
click to enlarge
Joachim A. Wtewael
1610 - 1615
click to enlarge
Jacob Jordaens
c. 1620
click to enlarge
Anthonis van Dyck
c. 1620
click to enlarge
Alessandro Algardi
1629
click to enlarge
Francesco Furini
c. 1630
click to enlarge
Alonso Cano
1646 - 1650



--- Pictures of young males by Leonardo
and other Renaissance artists ---

Here are some other examples that give you a good idea, how young males were usually depicted in the art of the Renaissance. As I said before, these faces look "feminine" to modern eyes, but not to the sculptors and painters themselves. Following Dan Brown's logic, a sketch for the Apostle Philippus would also "clearly show a woman". His assumption that Leonardo would have replaced John with Mary Magdalene is getting even more absurd, when you keep in mind that many biographers, for example Serge Bramly, tend to think that Leonardo and several other Renaissance artists were mainly, if not exclusively attracted to these beardless young males. There are more pictures that tell us how wrong the ideas of Dan Brown are, but I think these examples are already obvious enough.

click to enlarge
Leonardo
"Study of a naked Man
with a stab"

1476 - 1480
click to enlarge
Leonardo
"Sketch of St. Philip
for The Last Supper"

c. 1495
click to enlarge
Leonardo
"Heads of an old Man
and a Youth"

1495 - 1500
click to enlarge
after Leonardo
"Bacchus"
1510 - 1515
click to enlarge
Leonardo
"St. John the Baptist"
1513 - 1516
click to enlarge
Donatello
"David"
c. 1440
click to enlarge
Verrocchio
"David"
1475
drcken, um zu vergr”áern
Sandro Botticelli
"Portrait of a young Man"
c. 1477
click to enlarge
Sandro Botticelli
"Portrait of a Youth"
c. 1482 - 1483
click to enlarge
Pinturicchio
"Portrait of a Boy"
1482 - 1485
click to enlarge
Giovanni Bellini
"Madonna with Child and
St. Peter & St. Sebastian"

c. 1487
click to enlarge
Domenico Ghirlandaio
"Adoration of the Magi"
1488
click to enlarge
Lorenzo Costa
"St. Sebastian"
1490 - 1491
click to enlarge
Perugino
"Portrait of a Youth"
1495
click to enlarge
Raffaello
"Portrait of Pietro Bembo"
c. 1504


© April 14, 2006