Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

Cancel
8
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ There's a (currently) undefined iC1 in ndslB, which looks like the culprit :) . Taking it away, the femnlisl warning doesn't show up, and a non-trivial solution is obtained: i.sstatic.net/WvceWhwX.png $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 20 at 1:35
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It seems that the small addition in the denominator (10^-6) is done in order to eliminate the singularity. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 20 at 4:02
  • $\begingroup$ @Alex Trounev Yes. $\endgroup$ Commented 2 days ago
  • $\begingroup$ @AlexeiBoulbitch Actually we can solve this problem using linear FEM without this small addition. $\endgroup$ Commented 2 days ago
  • $\begingroup$ @Alex Trounev: Thank you for the hint. I added this cut-off term to avoid an occasional infinity in the numeric process. The equation I treated is essentially nonlinear even in its minimal form I gave above. However, the statement of a linear problem is also of acute interest, scince I am looking first of all for the point of the first bifurcation of the nonlinear system. This point is given by the smallest discrete eigenvalue of the linear system. Therefore, any hint (with an example) of such a problem is of a high interest. $\endgroup$ Commented 2 days ago