Structuring Social Futures: The Possibilities, the Challenges
Mind, Culture, and Activity, 2014
We are excited to introduce the articles for the first issue of Mind, Culture, and Activity in 20... more We are excited to introduce the articles for the first issue of Mind, Culture, and Activity in 2014. Taken together, these four articles and four book reviews reflect well the principles committed to by the new Editorial Group at the end of last year. Across the articles and book reviews the reader will find attention to: revisiting theoretical grounding in order to clarify key ideas, concepts, units; multiple views of the ways in which cultural-historical and activity theoretical research speaks to different disciplines and fields; concern for ethical engagement both as a subject of study and as a project to which our research contributes; and a range of expertise, experience, and voices. In addition, these articles and reviews have a common underlying theme that we find especially fitting for the new year: the possibilities and challenges of the tools we create socially, culturally, and historically to anticipate uncertain futures and attempt to structure them into recognizable and development enhancing futures. The articles in this issue foreground the role of units, routines, positioning, and pedagogies in the structuring of futures, an idea that surfaces more generally in the book reviews as well. Opening this issue, Wolff-Michael Roth’s article “Reading Activity, Consciousness, Personality Dialectically: Cultural-Historical Activity Theory and the Centrality of Society” examines theoretical units and reconsiders how they are interpreted. More than concepts in Leont’ev’s work, object-oriented activity, consciousness, and personality are units that retain the properties of the relation of individual-society. Roth draws upon his research to describe an ethnographic case study of Mike, a fish culturist, including the relation between Mike as an individual, the fish hatchery as an institution, and the impact of the Canadian economy on salmon enhancement program policies from the provincial and federal government as the societal context. He uses this case to look at the differences that different interpretations of activity, consciousness, and personality make to the potential explanations produced by research. Interpretations of units matter because they influence the conduct of research. They shape what constitutes data, how we analyze it, and what we take our analysis to mean. They structure a complicated research methodology into a recognizable research design, an act that both enables and constrains future research.
Uploads
Papers by Artin Goncu