Skip to content

8364816: GetLastError() in os_windows.cpp should not store value to errno #26901

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

toxaart
Copy link
Contributor

@toxaart toxaart commented Aug 22, 2025

Hi, please consider the following changes:

In os_windows.cpp nn a few places results returned by GetLastError() are stored to errno. However, errno has no relation to GetLastError(), and their ranges are not the same.

Results of GetLastError() should be stored into variables of type DWORD.

Tested in tiers 1 - 3.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8364816: GetLastError() in os_windows.cpp should not store value to errno (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26901/head:pull/26901
$ git checkout pull/26901

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/26901
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26901/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 26901

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 26901

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26901.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Aug 22, 2025

👋 Welcome back toxaart! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 22, 2025

❗ This change is not yet ready to be integrated.
See the Progress checklist in the description for automated requirements.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 22, 2025

@toxaart The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-runtime

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-runtime hotspot-runtime-dev@openjdk.org label Aug 22, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-runtime hotspot-runtime-dev@openjdk.org
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant